Line 80: |
Line 80: |
| | | |
| == Role of Worldview in Svasthya == | | == Role of Worldview in Svasthya == |
− | Underlying any concept of quality of life and wellbeing is a worldview, which provides a perspective on the nature of man, his place in the universe, and on the nature of the universe. The Vedic and Upanishadic seers emphasized on realizing that which is eternal (nitya) and permanent (satya), rather than going after anything that is momentary (kshanika) and that is liable to undergo decay and destruction (kshara) or impermanent (mithya) in the universe. This was an aspect of the more fundamental quest to know the ultimate truth, by seer and sages of India. They understood and defined the ultimate truth with reference to that which is permanent and everlasting rather than that which is impermanent and transient. They applied this distinction in understanding everything in the universe: physical, biological, psychological, ethical, moral, and so on. They made use of this distinction even to evaluate what is good and not good, what is worthy and unworthy, what is desirable and undesirable, etc. So in defining happiness and wellbeing they applied the same rule.<ref name=":2" /> | + | Underlying any concept of quality of life and wellbeing is a worldview, which provides a perspective on the nature of man, his place in the universe, and on the nature of the universe. |
| | | |
| Indian society is an amalgamation of the materialistic perspective (hedonistic) at one end, the spiritual perspective (transcendental) at the opposite end along and the various blends of materialistic and spiritual perspectives which is the collectivist perspective.<ref name=":2" /> | | Indian society is an amalgamation of the materialistic perspective (hedonistic) at one end, the spiritual perspective (transcendental) at the opposite end along and the various blends of materialistic and spiritual perspectives which is the collectivist perspective.<ref name=":2" /> |
Line 94: |
Line 94: |
| | | |
| === Vedic and Upanishadic Philosophy - Transcendent Viewpoint === | | === Vedic and Upanishadic Philosophy - Transcendent Viewpoint === |
− | On the other end of the psychological spectrum lies the ideal view of reality upheld across Indian traditions. Svasthya as well as Ananda (happiness) are purely subjective and do not depend on any objective conditions of reality, including one's state of body-mind-sense complex. This view is rooted in all paradigms | + | On the other end of the psychological spectrum lies the ideal view of reality upheld across Indian traditions. Svasthya as well as Ananda (happiness) are purely subjective and do not depend on any objective conditions of reality, including one's state of body-mind-sense complex. This view is rooted in all Vedic and Upanishadic traditions of India. The Vedic and Upanishadic seers emphasized on realizing that which is eternal (nitya) and permanent (satya), rather than going after anything that is momentary (kshanika) and that is liable to undergo decay and destruction (kshara) or impermanent (mithya) in the universe. This was an aspect of the more fundamental quest to know the ultimate truth, by seer and sages of India. They understood and defined the ultimate truth with reference to that which is permanent and everlasting rather than that which is impermanent and transient. They applied this distinction in understanding everything in the universe: physical, biological, psychological, ethical, moral, and so on. They made use of this distinction even to evaluate what is good and not good, what is worthy and unworthy, what is desirable and undesirable, etc. So in defining happiness and wellbeing they applied the same rule.<ref name=":2" /> |
| + | |
| + | Intuitive recognition of what was permanent and everlasting lead to the uncovering of an ultimate principle called variously as [[Brahman (ब्रह्मन्)|Brahman]] or Parabrahman, depending on the sampradaya. Brahman is referred to as having the signs of Satyam (Existence), Jnanam (Knowledge) and Anantam (Infinite). It is all-pervading, omniscient and hence considered as substratum of the universe. |
| | | |
| === Philosophy of Purusharthas - Collectivist Viewpoint === | | === Philosophy of Purusharthas - Collectivist Viewpoint === |