Difference between revisions of "Plant Taxonomy"
(typed 1st draft) |
(1st draft) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Introduction''' |
− | Though a single work devoted to botany is unknown, the knowledge of botany among Indians is well known from Vedas, works on Ayurveda, Krishishastra, Arthashastra and lexicons. Terms like Vrkshayurveda and Vanaspatividya tell us that knowledge of botany flourished in the past. | + | Though a single work devoted to botany is unknown, the knowledge of botany among Indians is well known from Vedas, works on Ayurveda, Krishishastra, Arthashastra and lexicons. Terms like Vrkshayurveda and Vanaspatividya tell us that knowledge of botany flourished in the past. There are few legends which indicate that ancient Indians had several beliefs associated with trees. For instance, Gobhilagrihyasutra mentions that Asvatta brings danger of fire to one’s residence and that Udumbara leads to a series of optical diseases. Also, Brihatsamhita speaks of trees like the Asoka and Punnaga which are beneficial to warfare. |
− | + | '''Literature Review''' | |
− | + | '''Nomenclature''' | |
− | The branch of taxonomy includes | + | The branch of taxonomy includes nomenclature and suitable grouping of the plants.In general, plants were named with a scientific approach. A look at the etymology of the synonymns of trees tells us that naming was backed by reason. |
− | + | * वृक्ष वृश्च्यते छिद्यते that which is cut | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | * महीरुह that which grows on Earth | ||
+ | * पादप that which drinks sap with roots | ||
+ | * शाखी that which has branches | ||
+ | * तरु तरन्ति अनेन आतपम् that by which people overcome heat | ||
+ | * अनोकह that whichobstructs pace of cart | ||
+ | * पलाशी that which has leaves | ||
+ | * अगम न गच्छतीति that which doesn’t move | ||
Similar scientific basis was adopted in naming the different varieties of plants based on various factors as provided in the following table. | Similar scientific basis was adopted in naming the different varieties of plants based on various factors as provided in the following table. | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Nomenclature of plants''' |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|'''Sl.No.''' | |'''Sl.No.''' | ||
Line 36: | Line 28: | ||
|1 | |1 | ||
|Special features | |Special features | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | + | # न्यग्रोधम् | |
− | + | # प्रसरणि | |
− | + | # वृक्षारुह | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | # Banyan tree is huge and blocks the road | |
− | + | # spreads on the ground- Ipomea tridentala | |
− | spreads on the ground- | + | # Vandaka grows on trees - Vanda roxburghi |
− | |||
− | Vandaka grows on trees | ||
|- | |- | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
− | |Morphological | + | |Morphological characters |
− | | | + | | |
− | + | # वक्रपुष्प | |
− | + | # वल्कद्रुम | |
− | + | # चित्रबीज / गन्धर्वहस्त | |
− | + | # पञ्चाङ्गुल | |
− | + | # स्वर्णक्षीर | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | # Has curved flowers - Sesbania grandiflora | |
− | + | # Has several roots - Banyan tree | |
− | |Has curved flowers - Sesbania grandiflora | + | # The bark has medicinal value and it is corky, paper-like! - Betula utilis |
− | + | # Has seeds with various marks and has palmate leaves(five-fingered!) - Castor oil plant (Ricinis communis) | |
− | Has several roots - Banyan tree | + | # Latex of roots of Kashmiri Hirtiz is golden yellow in colour - Euphoria thomsoniana |
− | |||
− | The bark has medicinal value and it is corky, paper-like! - | ||
− | |||
− | Has seeds with various marks and has palmate | ||
− | |||
− | Latex of roots of Kashmiri | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
|Comparison with familiar objects | |Comparison with familiar objects | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | + | # आखुकर्णि | |
− | + | # हलिनि | |
− | + | # शङ्खपुष्प | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | # The leaves resemble ears of rat | |
− | + | # Rhizomes resemble pestle | |
− | Rhizomes resemble pestle | + | # Flowers of Apraijta resemble conch |
− | |||
− | Flowers of Apraijta | ||
|- | |- | ||
|4 | |4 | ||
|Place or origin, habit, flowering season | |Place or origin, habit, flowering season | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | + | # द्रविडि | |
− | + | # यवन | |
− | + | # जलज पङ्कज | |
− | + | # सदाफल | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | # Is a South Indian crop - Cardamon | |
− | + | # Seeds grow in - Hyoscyamus | |
− | + | # Grows in water - Lotus | |
− | Seeds grow in | + | # Bears fruits in all seasons – Beal |
− | |||
− | Grows in water - Lotus | ||
− | |||
− | Bears fruits in all seasons – Beal | ||
|- | |- | ||
|5 | |5 | ||
|Innate Properties | |Innate Properties | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | + | # अजगन्ध | |
− | + | # अश्वगन्ध | |
− | + | # उश्न | |
− | + | # सीत | |
− | + | # पुत्रदा | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | # Has smell like odour of goat - Gynandropis gynandra | |
− | + | # Has smeel like odour of horse - Winter cherry | |
− | + | # Is hot in potency - Black pepper | |
− | + | # Is cool in potency - White sandalwood | |
− | Has smeel like odour of | + | # Cures sterility and bestows one with son - Ipomea sepiaria |
− | |||
− | Is hot in potency - | ||
− | |||
− | Is cool in potency - | ||
− | |||
− | Cures sterility and bestows one with son - Ipomea sepiaria | ||
|- | |- | ||
|6 | |6 | ||
|Pharmacological actions | |Pharmacological actions | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | + | # कृमिघ्न | |
− | + | # पाषानभेद | |
− | + | # कशमर्द | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | # It is a good anti-helmenthic | |
− | + | # It dissolves kidney-stones | |
− | It dissolves | + | # Relieves cough – Cassia occidentalis |
− | |||
− | Relieves cough – Cassia | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7 | |7 | ||
|Utility | |Utility | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | + | # स्यन्दन | |
− | + | # धनुर्द्रुम | |
− | + | # अग्निमन्थ | |
− | + | # व्रणारि | |
− | + | | | |
− | + | # The wood is used to make chariots - Lagerstroemia parviflora | |
− | + | # It is used for making bows - Bamboo | |
− | + | # Wood of is used for kindling sacrificial fire - Premna integrifolia | |
− | It is used for making bows - Bamboo | + | # cures boils (enemy of boils) |
− | |||
− | Wood of is used for kindling sacrificial fire - Premna integrifolia | ||
− | |||
− | cures boils (enemy of | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8 | |8 | ||
|Mythology | |Mythology | ||
− | | | + | | |
− | + | # बोधिद्रुम | |
− | + | # इन्द्रवृक्ष / सुरदारु / देवदारु | |
− | + | # कृष्णतुलसि | |
− | + | # सुरस | |
− | |Buddha attained | + | | |
− | + | # Buddha attained enlightenment under the peepul tree | |
− | The sacred fig (Peepal) Pinus deodara is Indra’s tree | + | # The sacred fig (Peepal) Pinus deodara is Indra’s tree |
− | + | # It is used in the worship of Lord Krishna | |
− | It is used in the | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | '''Classification - plants were categorised based on the criteria of botanical terms, properties and food value.''' | ||
− | + | '''Botanical terms :''' | |
− | + | ऋग्वेद (10.97.3,15) | |
− | + | ओषधीः प्रतिमोदध्वं पुष्पवतीः प्रसूवरीः । अश्वा इव सजिवरीर्वीरुधः पारयिष्णवः॥ | |
− | + | याः फलिनीर्या अफला अपुष्पा याश्च पुष्पिणीः । बृहस्पतिप्रसूतास्ता ना मुञ्चन्त्वंहसः ॥ | |
− | + | divides plants as फलिनी अफला अपुष्प पुष्पिनी | |
− | + | (ओषधि is a vedic term for a class of trees) | |
− | divides trees | + | divides trees as ओषधि गुल्म भेषज लता |
− | + | (8.7.4,1,12) | |
àSt&[tI StiMbnIrekzu¼a> àtNvtIrae;xIra vdaim, A<zumtI> kai{fnIyaR ivzaoa þyaim te vIédae vEñdevIé¢a> puê;jIvnI. | àSt&[tI StiMbnIrekzu¼a> àtNvtIrae;xIra vdaim, A<zumtI> kai{fnIyaR ivzaoa þyaim te vIédae vEñdevIé¢a> puê;jIvnI. | ||
Line 249: | Line 215: | ||
groups plants as- vnSpit , Ô‚m , lta and guLm | groups plants as- vnSpit , Ô‚m , lta and guLm | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Properties''' |
Caraka in his Sutra''sthana'' classifies plants as Purgatives and Astringents.The former has about 600 species whereas the latter has about 500 species. Sushruta classifies plants into 37 gana-s on similar basis. | Caraka in his Sutra''sthana'' classifies plants as Purgatives and Astringents.The former has about 600 species whereas the latter has about 500 species. Sushruta classifies plants into 37 gana-s on similar basis. | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Food value:''' |
Caraka classifies plants into 6 varieties as (Sutrasthana, IV): | Caraka classifies plants into 6 varieties as (Sutrasthana, IV): | ||
Line 277: | Line 243: | ||
pu:pvgR ,%iÑÖgR , ka{fvgR , tElvgR , #]uvgR | pu:pvgR ,%iÑÖgR , ka{fvgR , tElvgR , #]uvgR | ||
− | Science of the modern times defines Taxonomy as the branch of science that deals with the description, naming and classification of organisms. The term is derived from the ancient Greek words ''taxis'' | + | '''Modern Taxonomy''' |
+ | |||
+ | Science of the modern times defines Taxonomy as the branch of science that deals with the description, naming and classification of organisms. The term is derived from the ancient Greek words ''taxis'' (arrangement) and ''nomia'' (method). Taxonomist aims to group together living forms which have common associates. This science is hierarchical. à various Divisions à Classes à Orders à Families à Genera àSpecies.Thus, species is the basic unit of classification. There were various systems of classifications proposed by the westerners based on : | ||
1. Habits | 1. Habits | ||
Line 289: | Line 257: | ||
The first system of classification which is based on habits was put forth by the Greeks and was in vogue for about 10 centuries. The prominent contributors in this field are: | The first system of classification which is based on habits was put forth by the Greeks and was in vogue for about 10 centuries. The prominent contributors in this field are: | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Habits''' |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|'''Sl.''' | |'''Sl.''' | ||
Line 304: | Line 272: | ||
|Theophrastus | |Theophrastus | ||
− | (Father | + | (Father of botany) |
− | (370-285 | + | (370-285 B.C) |
− | - | + | - Greek |
|Form or | |Form or | ||
Line 314: | Line 282: | ||
|Trees, | |Trees, | ||
− | Shrubs, | + | Shrubs, |
− | Undershrubs | + | Undershrubs |
− | & | + | & Herbs |
− | |Distinguished | + | |Distinguished between centripetal & centrifugal inflorescences, recognised differences in ovary position, and in polypetalous and gamopetalous corollas |
|- | |- | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
− | |Andrea | + | |Andrea Cesalpino |
− | (1519-1631) | + | (1519-1631) - Italian |
− | |· ovary position; Number of locules in | + | |· ovary position; Number of locules in ovary bulbs; |
· nature of sap; | · nature of sap; | ||
− | |Herbs | + | |Herbs & Trees |
− | |Influenced | + | |Influenced later botanists like Linnaeus |
|- | |- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
− | |John | + | |John Ray (1628-1705) - English |
− | |Form | + | |Form & gross morphology |
− | |Woody | + | |Woody & herbaceous plants |
− | |Accounted | + | |Accounted for nearly 18000 species; recognised monocots & dicots; classes based on fruit-type (cone-bearing, nut-bearing. etc.,); superior to even Linnaean system |
|} | |} | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Artificial Systems based on numerical classifications''' |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|'''Sl.''' | |'''Sl.''' | ||
Line 348: | Line 316: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|1 | |1 | ||
− | |Carolus | + | |Carolus Linnaeus |
(1707-1778) | (1707-1778) | ||
− | Father | + | Father of taxonomic |
− | Botany | + | Botany & Zoology |
− | |Artificial | + | |Artificial System – length, union & number of stamens |
− | |Plants | + | |Plants were put into 24 classes; sub-divided into orders based on number of styles in each flower |
− | |Identification& | + | |Identification& naming of unknown plants was possible – a path breaking feature! |
|} | |} | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Systems based on form relationships''' |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|'''Sl.''' | |'''Sl.''' | ||
Line 370: | Line 338: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|1 | |1 | ||
− | |De | + | |De Jussieu |
− | (17<sup>th</sup> | + | (17<sup>th</sup> cen. AD) |
− | |Monocot | + | |Monocot vs. Dicots |
− | Ovary | + | Ovary position ; nature of petals ; distinctness of petals |
− | |Flowering | + | |Flowering plants were put into 15 classes ; 100 orders |
− | |Natural | + | |Natural system; each plant cleary differentialed , named, described |
|- | |- | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
− | |De | + | |De Candolle |
− | (18<sup>th</sup> | + | (18<sup>th</sup> cen AD) |
− | |Nature | + | |Nature of corolla, gamopetalous vs. Polypetalous corollas; ovary positions |
− | |Put | + | |Put plants into 161 families |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
− | |Bentham | + | |Bentham & Hooker(1800-1884)- English |
− | |Nature | + | |Nature of corolla & seeds, ovary position |
− | |Classifies | + | |Classifies plants into 200 orders , 7569 orders |
− | |Describes | + | |Describes taxa of all levels |
|} | |} | ||
− | ''' | + | '''Systems based on Phylogeny''' |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|'''Sl.''' | |'''Sl.''' | ||
Line 406: | Line 374: | ||
|Eichler(1839-1887) | |Eichler(1839-1887) | ||
|Seeds | |Seeds | ||
− | |Cryptogamae | + | |Cryptogamae – ferns, bryophytes, hepatics, fungi and algae& Phanerogamae- seed plants (thallophytes, bryophytes & pteridophytes) |
− | |Seed-plants | + | |Seed-plants were for the first time put into two major taxa – angiospermae & gynnospermae |
|- | |- | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
− | |Adolph | + | |Adolph Engler |
(1844-1930) | (1844-1930) | ||
− | |Monocots, | + | |Monocots, dicots |
− | |Angiospermae | + | |Angiospermae and gymnospermae ; the angiospermae were divided into monocots and dicots ; and dicots further sub-divided |
− | |Provides | + | |Provides means of identification of all of the known genera of plants from algae to advanced seed plants |
− | |} | + | |} |
+ | '''Analysis & Synthesis''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Indian system of classification adopted right from the vedic times to the times of the puranas and other lexicons provide classification based on habits, dietetic value and also on botanical terms. In the modern science systems, the classification is based on habits, natural and artificial methods. The hierarchial system of classification adopted by the modern scientists and the binomial nomenclature adopted by the westerners is absent in our traditional Indian system. The divisions of plants based on properties and food-value tell us that the focus of the Indians had been mainly on finding the usefulness of each & every plant and putting them under a broad category. In addition to that, since the naming of plants was done by notable morphological features, it appealed even to the common-man. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Conclusion''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | In both Indian and Modern systems, there is lot of science involved when it comes to identifying or naming plants. The plants were classed depending on the knowledge existing at that time about the variety or nature of plants. The Indians had minor variations with respect to definitions of few classes of plant-varieties.The Westerners were fairly uniform on the definitions of various botanical terminologies. | ||
+ | |||
+ | अथर्ववेद | ||
+ | |||
+ | प्रस्तृणती स्तम्बिनीरेकशृङ्गः प्रतन्वतीरोषधीरा वदामि | ||
+ | |||
+ | अंशुमतीः काण्डिनीर्या विशाखा ह्वयामि ते वीरुदो वैश्वदेवीरुग्राः पुरूपजीवनी | ||
+ | |||
+ | या बभ्रवो याश्चा शुक्रा रोहिणीरुत पृश्नयः | ||
+ | |||
+ | असिक्नीः कृष्णा ओषधीः सर्वा अच्छावदामसि | ||
+ | |||
+ | मधुमन्मूलं मधुमदग्रमासां मधुमन्मध्यं वीरुधां बभूव | ||
+ | |||
+ | मधुमत् पर्णं मधुमत् मधोः संभक्ता अमृतस्य भक्षो घृृतमन्नं दुह्रतां गोपुंरोगवम् | ||
+ | |||
+ | प्रस्तृृणति स्तम्बिनिः एकसृङ्गोः तनुवतिः अंशुमतिः कण्डिनि विशाखाः | ||
+ | |||
+ | शुक्रा रोहिणीसुत पृश्नयः असिक्नीः कृष्णा | ||
+ | |||
+ | मधुमन्मूलं मधुमदग्रम् मधुमन्मध्यं मधुमत् पर्णं मधुमत् पुष्पम् | ||
+ | |||
+ | पाणिनि | ||
+ | |||
+ | बभाषौधिवनस्पतिभ्यः अवयवे च प्राण्यौषधिवृक्षेभ्यः | ||
+ | |||
+ | वनं पुरगामिश्रकासिघ्रकासारिकाकोटराग्रेभ्यः | ||
+ | |||
+ | प्रनिरन्तः शरेक्षुम्लक्षाम्रकार्ष्यखादिरपीयूक्षाभ्योऽसंज्ञयामपि | ||
+ | |||
+ | ओषधिवन | ||
+ | |||
+ | वनस्पतिवन | ||
+ | |||
+ | मनु | ||
+ | |||
+ | ओषधि वनस्पति वृक्ष गुल्म तृण प्रतान वल्ली | ||
+ | |||
+ | उद्भिज्जाः स्थावराः सर्वे बीजकाण्डप्ररोहिणः । | ||
+ | |||
+ | ओषध्यः फलपाकान्ता बहुपुष्पकलोअगाः ॥ | ||
+ | |||
+ | अपुष्पाः फलवन्तो ये ते वनस्पतयः स्मृताः । | ||
+ | |||
+ | पुष्पिणः फलिनश्चैव वृक्षास्तूभयतः स्मृताः ॥ | ||
+ | |||
+ | गुच्छगुल्मं तु विविधं तथैव तृणजातयः | ||
+ | |||
+ | बीजकाण्डरुहाण्येव प्रताना वल्लय एव च ॥ | ||
+ | |||
+ | सुश्रुत चरक | ||
+ | |||
+ | तासां स्थावराश्चतुर्विधाः | ||
+ | |||
+ | वनस्पतयो वृक्षा वीरुध ओषधय इति तासु अपुष्पाः फलवन्तो वनस्पतयः पुष्पफलवन्तो वृक्षाः प्रतानवत्यः स्तम्बिन्यश्च वीरुधः फलपाकनिष्ठा ओषधय इति | ||
+ | |||
+ | वनस्पतयस्तथा वीरुद्वानस्पत्यस्तथौषधिः फलैः वनस्पतिः पुष्पैः वानस्पतयः फलैरपि | ||
+ | |||
+ | ओषध्यः फलपाकान्ताः प्रतावैः वीरुधः स्मृताः | ||
+ | |||
+ | वनस्पति वानस्पत्य | ||
+ | |||
+ | ओषधि वीरुध् | ||
+ | |||
+ | भागवत पुराण | ||
− | + | वनस्पत्यौषधिलतात्वक्सारा वीरुधो द्रुमाः | |
− | + | उत्स्रोतरस्तमः प्राया अन्तः स्पर्शा विशेषिणः | |
− | + | वनस्पति द्रुम ओषधि लता त्वक्सार वीरुध् | |
− | + | मत्स्यपुराण | |
− | + | यदाभिषिक्तः सकलाधिराज्ये पृथुर्धत्र्यामधिपो बभूव | |
− | + | तदौषधीनामधिपं चकार यञव्रतानां तपसाञ्च चन्द्रम् | |
− | + | नक्षत्रतारद्विजवृक्षगुल्मलतावितानस्य च रुक्मगर्भः | |
− | + | अपामधीशं वरुणं धनानां राज्ञां प्रभुं वैश्रवणञ्च तद्वत् | |
− | + | जलजस्थलजैः पुष्पैः प्रोत्फुल्लैः उपधोभितम् | |
− | + | चित्रकन्दरसंस्थानं गुहागृहमनोहरम् | |
− | + | वृक्ष गुल्म लता वीरुध वल्ली ओषधि कृष्ट स्वयम्जात जलज स्थलज | |
− | + | उपवनविनोद | |
− | + | वनस्पतिद्रुमलतागुल्माः पदजातयः | |
− | + | बीजात्काण्डात्तथा कन्दात्तज्जन्म त्रिविधं विदुः | |
− | + | वनस्पति द्रुम लता गुल्म |
Latest revision as of 14:20, 4 June 2020
Introduction
Though a single work devoted to botany is unknown, the knowledge of botany among Indians is well known from Vedas, works on Ayurveda, Krishishastra, Arthashastra and lexicons. Terms like Vrkshayurveda and Vanaspatividya tell us that knowledge of botany flourished in the past. There are few legends which indicate that ancient Indians had several beliefs associated with trees. For instance, Gobhilagrihyasutra mentions that Asvatta brings danger of fire to one’s residence and that Udumbara leads to a series of optical diseases. Also, Brihatsamhita speaks of trees like the Asoka and Punnaga which are beneficial to warfare.
Literature Review
Nomenclature
The branch of taxonomy includes nomenclature and suitable grouping of the plants.In general, plants were named with a scientific approach. A look at the etymology of the synonymns of trees tells us that naming was backed by reason.
- वृक्ष वृश्च्यते छिद्यते that which is cut
- महीरुह that which grows on Earth
- पादप that which drinks sap with roots
- शाखी that which has branches
- तरु तरन्ति अनेन आतपम् that by which people overcome heat
- अनोकह that whichobstructs pace of cart
- पलाशी that which has leaves
- अगम न गच्छतीति that which doesn’t move
Similar scientific basis was adopted in naming the different varieties of plants based on various factors as provided in the following table.
Nomenclature of plants
Sl.No. | Parameter | Plant – Name | Reason for the Name |
1 | Special features |
|
|
2 | Morphological characters |
|
|
3 | Comparison with familiar objects |
|
|
4 | Place or origin, habit, flowering season |
|
|
5 | Innate Properties |
|
|
6 | Pharmacological actions |
|
|
7 | Utility |
|
|
8 | Mythology |
|
|
Classification - plants were categorised based on the criteria of botanical terms, properties and food value.
Botanical terms :
ऋग्वेद (10.97.3,15)
ओषधीः प्रतिमोदध्वं पुष्पवतीः प्रसूवरीः । अश्वा इव सजिवरीर्वीरुधः पारयिष्णवः॥
याः फलिनीर्या अफला अपुष्पा याश्च पुष्पिणीः । बृहस्पतिप्रसूतास्ता ना मुञ्चन्त्वंहसः ॥
divides plants as फलिनी अफला अपुष्प पुष्पिनी
(ओषधि is a vedic term for a class of trees)
divides trees as ओषधि गुल्म भेषज लता
(8.7.4,1,12)
àSt&[tI StiMbnIrekzu¼a> àtNvtIrae;xIra vdaim, A<zumtI> kai{fnIyaR ivzaoa þyaim te vIédae vEñdevIé¢a> puê;jIvnI.
ya bævae yaí zu³a raeih[Iét p&îy>,
Ais²I> k«:[a Aae;xI> svaR ACDavdamis.
mxumNmUl< mxumd¢masa< mxumNmXy< vIéxa< bÉUv,
mxumt! p[¡ mxumt! mxae> s<É´a Am&tSy É]ae "&tmÚ< Êÿta< gaepu<raegvm!.
divides plants as àSt&[it , StiMbin> , @ks&¼ae> , tnuvit>, A<zumit>, ki{fin> and ivzaoa>
divides plants on the basis of colour as - zu³a , raeih[Iét , p&îy> , Ais²I> and k«:[a
divides plants based on sweetness as - mxumNmUl< , mxumd¢m! , mxumNmXy< , mxumt! p[¡ and mxumt! pu:pm!
Ø pai[in (VIII.4.6 , IV.3.133.VIII.4.4 , VIII.4.5)
vÉa;aE;ixvnSpit_y> , Avyve c àa{yaE;ixv&]e_y> ,
vn< purgaimïkaisºkasairkakaeqra¢e_y> , àinrNt>zre]uPl]aèka:yRoidrpIyU]a_yae=s<}ayamip,
groups as- Aae;ix vn (producing herbs) and vnSpit vn producing timber)
Ø mnu (I.46-48)
Aae;ix , vnSpit , v&] ,guLm ,t&[, àtan and v‘I
%iѾa> Swavra> sveR bIjka{fàraeih[>,Aae;Xy> )lpakaNta b÷pu:Ppklaepga>.
Apu:pa> )lvNtae ye te vnSpty> Sm&ta>,pui:p[> )ilníEv v&]aStUÉyt> Sm&ta>.
guCDguLm< tu ivivx< twEv t&[jaty>,bIjka{fêha{yev àtana v‘y @v c.
Ø suïut (sutrasthana .1.29) & crk (sutrasthana .1.71,72)
tasa< SwavraítuivRxa> - vnSptyae , v&]a , vIéx , Aae;xy #it, tasu Apu:pa> )lvNtae, vnSpty> pu:p)lvNtae v&]a> , àtanvTy> StiMbNyí vIéx> , )lpakinóa Aae;xy #it.
vnSpStwa vIéÖanSpTyStwaE;ix>. )lE> vnSpit> pu:pE> vanSpTy> )lErip, Aae;Xy> )lpakaNta> àtavE> vIéx> Sm&ta>.
vnSpit ,vanSpTy (trees bearing flowers followed by fruits) ,Aae;ix , vIéx! (same as gulma & lata )
Ø Éagvt pura[(III.10.19)
vnpTyae;ixltaTvKsara vIéxae Ô‚ma>, %TöaetsStm> àaya ANt> SpzaR ivzei;[>.
groups plants as- vnSpit , Ô‚m , Aae;ix , lta (is the same as valli of manu) , TvKsar and
vIéx! (shrubs that are like clumps)
Ø mTSypura[ (8.2,3 ; 153.304)
ydaiÉi;´> sklaixraJye p&wuxRirÈyamixpae bÉUv,tdaE;xInamixp< ckar y|ìtana< tpsa cNÔm!.
n]ÇtariÖjv&]guLmltaivtanSy c éKmgÉR>,ApamxIz< vé[< xnana< ra}a< àÉu< vEïv[ tÖt!.
jljSwljE> pu:pE> àaeT)…L‘E> %pxaeiÉtm!,icÇkNdrs<Swan< guhag&hmnaehrm!.
classifies plants as: v&] , guLm , lta , vIéx , v‘I
divides Aae;ix (trees) as: k«ò and SvyMjat
divides flowers as: jlj and Swlj
Ø %pvnivnaed (verse 43)
vnSpitÔ‚mltaguLma> pdjaty>, bIjaTka{faÄwa kNdaľNm iÇivx< ivÊ>.
groups plants as- vnSpit , Ô‚m , lta and guLm
Properties
Caraka in his Sutrasthana classifies plants as Purgatives and Astringents.The former has about 600 species whereas the latter has about 500 species. Sushruta classifies plants into 37 gana-s on similar basis.
Food value:
Caraka classifies plants into 6 varieties as (Sutrasthana, IV):
ü xaNyvgR Graminaceae (corns with husk)divided into 11 varieties like zail, ìIih yv & gaexUm
ü zamIxaNyvgR Leguminosae (12 types of corns) Eg. muÌ ma;a
ü zaoavgR (18 types of vegetables)
ü )lvgR
ü hirÖgR (includes Zingiber officinale, Raphanus saticus,Allium cepa & Allium
sativum )
ü AaharyaigvgR oils of sesamum and mustard
Susruta classified plants into 15 types based on food-value as (Sutrasthana, XXVIII):
zailxaNy, ;iòk, ìIihxaNy, k…xaNyvgR , vEdl , tl,yv ,izMb, )lvgR ,zakavgR
pu:pvgR ,%iÑÖgR , ka{fvgR , tElvgR , #]uvgR
Modern Taxonomy
Science of the modern times defines Taxonomy as the branch of science that deals with the description, naming and classification of organisms. The term is derived from the ancient Greek words taxis (arrangement) and nomia (method). Taxonomist aims to group together living forms which have common associates. This science is hierarchical. à various Divisions à Classes à Orders à Families à Genera àSpecies.Thus, species is the basic unit of classification. There were various systems of classifications proposed by the westerners based on :
1. Habits
2. Artificial Systems based on numerical classifications
3. Systems based on form relationships
4. Systems based on Phylogeny
The first system of classification which is based on habits was put forth by the Greeks and was in vogue for about 10 centuries. The prominent contributors in this field are:
Habits
Sl.
No. |
Scientist | Distinguishing
Characters |
Types | Feature |
1 | Theophrastus
(Father of botany) (370-285 B.C) - Greek |
Form or
Texture |
Trees,
Shrubs, Undershrubs & Herbs |
Distinguished between centripetal & centrifugal inflorescences, recognised differences in ovary position, and in polypetalous and gamopetalous corollas |
2 | Andrea Cesalpino
(1519-1631) - Italian |
· ovary position; Number of locules in ovary bulbs;
· nature of sap; |
Herbs & Trees | Influenced later botanists like Linnaeus |
3 | John Ray (1628-1705) - English | Form & gross morphology | Woody & herbaceous plants | Accounted for nearly 18000 species; recognised monocots & dicots; classes based on fruit-type (cone-bearing, nut-bearing. etc.,); superior to even Linnaean system |
Artificial Systems based on numerical classifications
Sl.
No. |
Scientist | Characters | Types | Feature |
1 | Carolus Linnaeus
(1707-1778) Father of taxonomic Botany & Zoology |
Artificial System – length, union & number of stamens | Plants were put into 24 classes; sub-divided into orders based on number of styles in each flower | Identification& naming of unknown plants was possible – a path breaking feature! |
Systems based on form relationships
Sl.
No. |
Scientist | Characters | Types | Feature |
1 | De Jussieu
(17th cen. AD) |
Monocot vs. Dicots
Ovary position ; nature of petals ; distinctness of petals |
Flowering plants were put into 15 classes ; 100 orders | Natural system; each plant cleary differentialed , named, described |
2 | De Candolle
(18th cen AD) |
Nature of corolla, gamopetalous vs. Polypetalous corollas; ovary positions | Put plants into 161 families | |
3 | Bentham & Hooker(1800-1884)- English | Nature of corolla & seeds, ovary position | Classifies plants into 200 orders , 7569 orders | Describes taxa of all levels |
Systems based on Phylogeny
Sl.
No. |
Scientist | Characters | Types | Feature |
1 | Eichler(1839-1887) | Seeds | Cryptogamae – ferns, bryophytes, hepatics, fungi and algae& Phanerogamae- seed plants (thallophytes, bryophytes & pteridophytes) | Seed-plants were for the first time put into two major taxa – angiospermae & gynnospermae |
2 | Adolph Engler
(1844-1930) |
Monocots, dicots | Angiospermae and gymnospermae ; the angiospermae were divided into monocots and dicots ; and dicots further sub-divided | Provides means of identification of all of the known genera of plants from algae to advanced seed plants |
Analysis & Synthesis
The Indian system of classification adopted right from the vedic times to the times of the puranas and other lexicons provide classification based on habits, dietetic value and also on botanical terms. In the modern science systems, the classification is based on habits, natural and artificial methods. The hierarchial system of classification adopted by the modern scientists and the binomial nomenclature adopted by the westerners is absent in our traditional Indian system. The divisions of plants based on properties and food-value tell us that the focus of the Indians had been mainly on finding the usefulness of each & every plant and putting them under a broad category. In addition to that, since the naming of plants was done by notable morphological features, it appealed even to the common-man.
Conclusion
In both Indian and Modern systems, there is lot of science involved when it comes to identifying or naming plants. The plants were classed depending on the knowledge existing at that time about the variety or nature of plants. The Indians had minor variations with respect to definitions of few classes of plant-varieties.The Westerners were fairly uniform on the definitions of various botanical terminologies.
अथर्ववेद
प्रस्तृणती स्तम्बिनीरेकशृङ्गः प्रतन्वतीरोषधीरा वदामि
अंशुमतीः काण्डिनीर्या विशाखा ह्वयामि ते वीरुदो वैश्वदेवीरुग्राः पुरूपजीवनी
या बभ्रवो याश्चा शुक्रा रोहिणीरुत पृश्नयः
असिक्नीः कृष्णा ओषधीः सर्वा अच्छावदामसि
मधुमन्मूलं मधुमदग्रमासां मधुमन्मध्यं वीरुधां बभूव
मधुमत् पर्णं मधुमत् मधोः संभक्ता अमृतस्य भक्षो घृृतमन्नं दुह्रतां गोपुंरोगवम्
प्रस्तृृणति स्तम्बिनिः एकसृङ्गोः तनुवतिः अंशुमतिः कण्डिनि विशाखाः
शुक्रा रोहिणीसुत पृश्नयः असिक्नीः कृष्णा
मधुमन्मूलं मधुमदग्रम् मधुमन्मध्यं मधुमत् पर्णं मधुमत् पुष्पम्
पाणिनि
बभाषौधिवनस्पतिभ्यः अवयवे च प्राण्यौषधिवृक्षेभ्यः
वनं पुरगामिश्रकासिघ्रकासारिकाकोटराग्रेभ्यः
प्रनिरन्तः शरेक्षुम्लक्षाम्रकार्ष्यखादिरपीयूक्षाभ्योऽसंज्ञयामपि
ओषधिवन
वनस्पतिवन
मनु
ओषधि वनस्पति वृक्ष गुल्म तृण प्रतान वल्ली
उद्भिज्जाः स्थावराः सर्वे बीजकाण्डप्ररोहिणः ।
ओषध्यः फलपाकान्ता बहुपुष्पकलोअगाः ॥
अपुष्पाः फलवन्तो ये ते वनस्पतयः स्मृताः ।
पुष्पिणः फलिनश्चैव वृक्षास्तूभयतः स्मृताः ॥
गुच्छगुल्मं तु विविधं तथैव तृणजातयः
बीजकाण्डरुहाण्येव प्रताना वल्लय एव च ॥
सुश्रुत चरक
तासां स्थावराश्चतुर्विधाः
वनस्पतयो वृक्षा वीरुध ओषधय इति तासु अपुष्पाः फलवन्तो वनस्पतयः पुष्पफलवन्तो वृक्षाः प्रतानवत्यः स्तम्बिन्यश्च वीरुधः फलपाकनिष्ठा ओषधय इति
वनस्पतयस्तथा वीरुद्वानस्पत्यस्तथौषधिः फलैः वनस्पतिः पुष्पैः वानस्पतयः फलैरपि
ओषध्यः फलपाकान्ताः प्रतावैः वीरुधः स्मृताः
वनस्पति वानस्पत्य
ओषधि वीरुध्
भागवत पुराण
वनस्पत्यौषधिलतात्वक्सारा वीरुधो द्रुमाः
उत्स्रोतरस्तमः प्राया अन्तः स्पर्शा विशेषिणः
वनस्पति द्रुम ओषधि लता त्वक्सार वीरुध्
मत्स्यपुराण
यदाभिषिक्तः सकलाधिराज्ये पृथुर्धत्र्यामधिपो बभूव
तदौषधीनामधिपं चकार यञव्रतानां तपसाञ्च चन्द्रम्
नक्षत्रतारद्विजवृक्षगुल्मलतावितानस्य च रुक्मगर्भः
अपामधीशं वरुणं धनानां राज्ञां प्रभुं वैश्रवणञ्च तद्वत्
जलजस्थलजैः पुष्पैः प्रोत्फुल्लैः उपधोभितम्
चित्रकन्दरसंस्थानं गुहागृहमनोहरम्
वृक्ष गुल्म लता वीरुध वल्ली ओषधि कृष्ट स्वयम्जात जलज स्थलज
उपवनविनोद
वनस्पतिद्रुमलतागुल्माः पदजातयः
बीजात्काण्डात्तथा कन्दात्तज्जन्म त्रिविधं विदुः
वनस्पति द्रुम लता गुल्म