Changes

== The esoteric meaning of yama yami’s discussion ==

== Introduction  The title should be Yama Yami Discussion ==

To understand the deeper concepts of Yamraja one needs to hear the discussion between Yama and Yami (Ruk Samhita 10.10.4).

To understand the deeper concepts of Yamraja one needs to hear the discussion between Yama and Yami (Ruk Samhita 10.10.4).

# Who is Yama and Yami?

# Who is Yama and Yami?

# What is the significance of the discussion between Yama and Yami?

# What is the significance of the discussion between Yama and Yami?

If this dialogue is not seen with greater depth it will only create misconceptions. One meaning of Yama is ||Jodi (together).   '''.''' That means either it is couples or siblings.    This sukta describes Yama and Yami as brother and sister  In ruk Samhita (10.10.4 and 10.17.1) Yama is described as the Trushtha’s  daughter Sharanyu devi’s son. Vivasvanta is his father. Yaska explains that Sharanyu devi - Sharanyu Sharanat, the root word, Sra means one who is always moving ahead or always running. Sharanyu devi’s first children were born through Surya dev. After that she disappeared and placed another devata women of the same Varna, Savarna doing act of  procreation.   She became Chaya and became famous'''.'''  Through Chaya Manu was born. When ||Surya dev (Sun god) realized that Chhaya was not Sharanyu he started looking for her. When he saw her as a ||ashwa (horse) he also assumed the form of a horse and through their union, the Ashwini devatas were born. Yasya explains this in his Nirukta (12.10).   Many do misunderstand twins to be Ashwini kumaras.  

If this dialogue is not seen with greater depth it will only create misconceptions. One meaning of Yama is ||Jodi (together)'''.''' That means either it is couples or siblings. This sukta describes Yama and Yami as brother and sister  In ruk Samhita (10.10.4 and 10.17.1) Yama is described as the Trushtha’s  daughter Sharanyu devi’s son. Vivasvanta is his father. Yaska explains that Sharanyu devi - Sharanyu Sharanat, the root word, Sra means one who is always moving ahead or always running. Sharanyu devi’s first children were born through Surya dev. After that she disappeared and placed another devata women of the same Varna, Savarna doing act of  procreation.   She became Chaya and became famous'''.'''  Through Chaya Manu was born. When ||Surya dev (Sun god) realized that Chhaya was not Sharanyu he started looking for her. When he saw her as a ||ashwa (horse) he also assumed the form of a horse and through their union, the Ashwini devatas were born. Yasya explains this in his Nirukta (12.10). Many do misunderstand twins to be Ashwini kumaras.  

 

Surya is the representation of ||'''kala ('''time factor''')''', which moves very fast. Kala and speed are compared to Tvashthra and Sharanyu  and their progeny is Yama, He represents one prinicple of time  that is of destruction.  Is it not easy to understand?  Kala is generating force, it is maintaining force and also destructive force.  Kala is also nourishing  Surya who is the represents all aspect time, also act as nourishing power which is represented in Ashwini Kumaras, who give long life and healthy life.  This is also very significant about kala or yama.  In this way kala has been depicted as pleasing, his benefits to us, and these characters are reflected in Ashwini Kumaras.  Similalry Yama and Yami represents another aspect of Kala, which is brutal and destructive.  This is meaning is established here.  Now one can discuss the deeper meaning of discussion between Yama and Yami.    

Surya is the representation of ||'''kala ('''time factor''')''', which moves very fast. Kala and speed are compared to Tvashthra and Sharanyu  and their progeny is Yama, He represents one prinicple of time  that is of destruction.  Is it not easy to understand?  Kala is generating force, it is maintaining force and also destructive force.  Kala is also nourishing  Surya who is the represents all aspect time, also act as nourishing power which is represented in Ashwini Kumaras, who give long life and healthy life.  This is also very significant about kala or yama.  In this way kala has been depicted as pleasing, his benefits to us, and these characters are reflected in Ashwini Kumaras.  Similalry Yama and Yami represents another aspect of Kala, which is brutal and destructive.  This is meaning is established here.  Now one can discuss the deeper meaning of discussion between Yama and Yami.    

'''Part 8'''

'''Part 8'''

== Some ludicrous explanation of western indologist.  ==

== Debunking the Lies of Western Indologist.  ==

The devious agenda of western Indologists is seen in the translation of the suktas. How does he misinterpret the Yama Yami discussion? A foolish person will see that a sister wishes to have union with a brother, as she is unable to control her kaama (desire). And therefore she persuades her brother in lustly activities.   . Anthropologists and psychologists in their practices are accustomed to such behavior as such instances appear in their works of literature or history. A self-styled Indologist of the missionaries of Christianity projects the story of  Yama and Yami in a denigrating way to drag our devatas to this low level. He explains that Yama and Yami are the original personalities of human existence and using Christian theology compares them to Adam and Eve.  He say that this discussions are shameless between the two.   He claims these  discussions questions their  ethical stability.. This is pure fiction as nowhere the Vedas say that Yama and Yami were the original persons during creation('''The Religion of the Rik veda, page 324)''' ). There is no reference of Yama and Yami being the original personalities of creation.  Especially, what is the relationship between the original person of Christianity,  and  the incharge of ancestors, Yamaraja.   In fact the vedic suktas makes it very clear that Yama and Yami did not unite.  Yami symbolizes bhoga shakti(power) and Yama symbolizes power to restrain).   Claiming that Yama and Yami were the original human beings as Christianity claims that Adam and Eve were is akin to saying that some children were born to a barren women. These fictitious claims clearly reveals the evil motives of the Western Indologists who misinterpreted our Shastras.   not only to denigrate it but also most daringly borrowed and digested our itihasa and attribute it to Chritsianity, The most brilliant example of their devious Indology plan is the Aryan Invasion theory and the creation of the Dravidian Sect.  Apart from giving respectability to the created modern religion, Christianity it also helped them to claim ownership of our Shastras. Further, the fake manufacturing of history based on the Christian worldview apart from propagating their religion as superior to the ‘pagan’ natives was also to gain control over the economic, territorial, philosophical resources and most importantly our social capital.

 

The devious agenda of western Indologists is seen in the translation of the suktas. How does he misinterpret the Yama Yami discussion? A foolish person will see that a sister wishes to have union with a brother, as she is unable to control her kaama (desire). And therefore she persuades her brother in lusty activities.   . Anthropologists and psychologists in their practices are accustomed to such behavior as such instances appear in their works of literature or history. A self-styled Indologist of the missionaries of Christianity projects the story of  Yama and Yami in a denigrating way to drag our devatas to this low level. He explains that Yama and Yami are the original personalities of human existence and using Christian theology compares them to Adam and Eve.  He say that this discussions are shameless between the two.   He claims these  discussions questions their  ethical stability.. This is pure fiction as nowhere the Vedas say that Yama and Yami were the original persons during creation (The Religion of the Rik veda, page 324) ). There is no reference of Yama and Yami being the original personalities of creation.  Especially, what is the relationship between the original person of Christianity,  and  the in-charge of ancestors, Yamaraja.   In fact the vedic suktas makes it very clear that Yama and Yami did not unite.  Yami symbolizes bhoga shakti (power) and Yama symbolizes power to restrain).   Claiming that Yama and Yami were the original human beings as Christianity claims that Adam and Eve were is akin to saying that some children were born to a barren women. These fictitious claims clearly reveals the evil motives of the Western Indologists who misinterpreted our Shastras.   not only to denigrate it but also most daringly borrowed and digested our itihasa and attribute it to Christianity, The most brilliant example of their devious Indology plan is the Aryan Invasion theory and the creation of the Dravidian Sect.  Apart from giving respectability to the created modern religion, Christianity it also helped them to claim ownership of our Shastras. Further, the fake manufacturing of history based on the Christian worldview apart from propagating their religion as superior to the ‘pagan’ natives was also to gain control over the economic, territorial, philosophical resources and most importantly our social capital.

So called Indian scholars, who being brainwashed by such writings of the western indologist, have proved that  they are  being bewildered.    Dr. Kirti Mishra (Life and society in the Vedic Age) he writes so much of illogical things.   His claims the prayers, tree branches, trees, water, sky, and etc., apparently them keep human happy.   Therefore he claims that our ancestors were living on the trees and they were aborigines.  Same Author quoting the  '''Aitreya brahmana, he claims that The  description of Prajapati’s marriages shows that, it was uncivilized way of getting married.  He also says that, the Aryanas had the communal marriages, father would marry daughter and mother would marry son and the brothers and sisters would marry amongst each other.   There was no restriction amongst family members to marry with each other.  To prove his points he quotes a reference from a communist perspective( Engles: the Origin of the family, private property and the state).   By claiming that''' the  marriage of Prajapati is like actually reality, and he is only a historical person and by accepting the marriage as it is the indologist have proved their whole process of understanding history is faulty.  Rawth wilson, who was more famous that and others have defended such theories of distorted understanding.   '''Max Muller, according to him  Yama is day, Yami is Night'''. Although Max Muller does not directly say that Yama and Yami were the original people of the Indian culture,  '''in his book lecture of science (pgs no 510 , 521)'''. To distort the symbolical aspects of our civilisation and misinterpreting its original meaning for colonising us is adharmic and should be termed as cultural genocide. This makes it necessary to understand and present the real meaning

Further, Indian historians brainwashed by the Western academic Mafia followed these distortions. Dr. Kirti Mishra (Life and society in the Vedic Age) claims that the prayers, tree branches, trees, water, sky, etc. were there to keep human happy. Therefore, he says that our ancestors were living on trees and were aborigines. he further states that the description of Prajapati’s marriages as in the Aitreya brahmana is an uncivilized way of getting married. According to him, Aryans had incestous marriages, the father would marry daughter and mother would marry son and the brothers and sisters would marry each other. There was no restriction amongst family members to marry with each other.  To prove his point he quotes a reference from Engles (the Origin of the Family, Private property and the State). '''By claiming that the  marriage of Prajapati is like actually reality, and he is only a historical person and by accepting the marriage as it is the indologist have proved their whole process of understanding history is faulty.'''  Rawth wilson & Max Muller have defended these theories. According to Max Mueller, Yama is day, Yami is Night, Although Max Muller does not directly say that Yama and Yami were the original people of the Indian culture,  in his book lecture of science (pgs no 510 , 521). To distort the symbolical aspects of our civilisation and misinterpreting its original meaning for colonising us is adharmic and should be termed as cultural genocide. This makes it necessary to understand and present the real meaning

In  essence those who do not see the vedic suktas from a Bharatiya perspective and Bharatiya understanding, they will be surprised and shocked, and it is not a shocking thing.   We can carefully observe the suktas in their original understanding.

In  essence those who do not see the vedic suktas from a Bharatiya perspective and Bharatiya understanding, they will be surprised and shocked, and it is not a shocking thing.   We can carefully observe the suktas in their original understanding.

== THE SUMMARY OF SUKTAS ==

== The Summary of the Suktas ==

Yami tells Yama,

Yami tells Yama,