The central force of a political architecture is its legal system and the king is a protector and preserver of the law but most definitely not its creator which means his power is sanctioned and limited by law. Be the powers vested, the actions of CEOs of companies are governed by the Companies Act , Income Tax Act, SEBI Regulations, and the likes of these. It is a common practice in the U.S to pass no confidence motions against CEOs of companies for non-performance. His kingship is challenged, by the board of directors, as he is unable to achieve what he envisioned for the company and customers. This establishes the temporal sovereignty status of the CEO where the V''arjasva Takat'' (Ultimate power) of the power owner is called into question resulting in dethroning the leader. Recent real-life corporate citations are available to corroborate this. | The central force of a political architecture is its legal system and the king is a protector and preserver of the law but most definitely not its creator which means his power is sanctioned and limited by law. Be the powers vested, the actions of CEOs of companies are governed by the Companies Act , Income Tax Act, SEBI Regulations, and the likes of these. It is a common practice in the U.S to pass no confidence motions against CEOs of companies for non-performance. His kingship is challenged, by the board of directors, as he is unable to achieve what he envisioned for the company and customers. This establishes the temporal sovereignty status of the CEO where the V''arjasva Takat'' (Ultimate power) of the power owner is called into question resulting in dethroning the leader. Recent real-life corporate citations are available to corroborate this. |