Line 38: |
Line 38: |
| * Another accepts the existence of soul but denies the existence of God, arguing that the creation did not take place and refuses to accept the transformation from asat to sat. | | * Another accepts the existence of soul but denies the existence of God, arguing that the creation did not take place and refuses to accept the transformation from asat to sat. |
| * Another philosophy says, Creation does not exist, God does not exist, that the process of Creation never took place; but believes that Reality is misery. The Srishti which is perceived by the eye is only भ्रान्तिः || bhranti (illusion) born out of अविद्या ॥ Avidya (ignorance) and hence of प्रतित्यसमुत्पादः || pratityasamutpada. | | * Another philosophy says, Creation does not exist, God does not exist, that the process of Creation never took place; but believes that Reality is misery. The Srishti which is perceived by the eye is only भ्रान्तिः || bhranti (illusion) born out of अविद्या ॥ Avidya (ignorance) and hence of प्रतित्यसमुत्पादः || pratityasamutpada. |
− | * Another viewpoint claims, प्रकृतिः || Prakrti is जडः || Jada (inanimate) and पुरुषः || Purusha is चेतनः || Chetana (animate). The components of world namely, Prakrti and Purusha are compared to the lame person sitting on a blind man’s back who is leading the way. It also says that Purusha who is without form has been caught by the dancer who is Creation, and getting liberated from her clutches is the ultimate liberation. They say bondage is creation and nature its root. | + | * Another viewpoint claims, प्रकृतिः || Prakrti is जड़ः || Jada (inanimate) and पुरुषः || Purusha is चेतनः || Chetana (animate). The components of world namely, Prakrti and Purusha are compared to the lame person sitting on a blind man’s back who is leading the way. It also says that Purusha who is without form has been caught by the dancer who is Creation, and getting liberated from her clutches is the ultimate liberation. They say bondage is creation and nature its root. |
| * Another school of thought rejects the existence of चित्तवृत्तिः (chittavrtti) while accepting the concept of ईशवरः || Ishwara. Ishvara according to them, is the object or medium to attain the शून्यरूपमनस्थितिः || shoonya roopa manasthiti and is not the Ultimate goal to be attained. Hence, the ultimate goal here is to achieve shoonya roopa manasthiti, also called as शून्यवादः || Shoonyavada. | | * Another school of thought rejects the existence of चित्तवृत्तिः (chittavrtti) while accepting the concept of ईशवरः || Ishwara. Ishvara according to them, is the object or medium to attain the शून्यरूपमनस्थितिः || shoonya roopa manasthiti and is not the Ultimate goal to be attained. Hence, the ultimate goal here is to achieve shoonya roopa manasthiti, also called as शून्यवादः || Shoonyavada. |
| * One theory concludes by saying, ‘inanimate panchabhutas are the cause for the creation.’ | | * One theory concludes by saying, ‘inanimate panchabhutas are the cause for the creation.’ |