Line 2,105: |
Line 2,105: |
| implies that even amongst the seers, the speakers and hearers, one with authentic | | implies that even amongst the seers, the speakers and hearers, one with authentic |
| percepetion, authentic speech and authentic hearing, is a rarity. | | percepetion, authentic speech and authentic hearing, is a rarity. |
| + | |
| + | 2-30: |
| + | dehi nityam avadhyo yam dehe � sarvasya bharata |
| + | tasmat sarvani bhutani na tvam socitum arhasi |
| + | dehi-> Atma (it resides in body); Nityam->Eternal ; |
| + | "Na Tvam sochitu arhasi".. THis is a common refrain of Krishna in many slokas, |
| + | which implies that "you do not grieve"! |
| + | Here Krishna says that Self(Jeevatma) exists in everyone's body and even when all |
| + | this bodies perish, the atma(s) in them do not |
| + | perish. Note that, Krishna says there is Jeevatma in everyone's body and it's |
| + | not that ONE atma pervades all bodies! |
| + | This is in response to Arjuna's doubt: 'I am understanding about the perishability |
| + | of body as per krishan's slokas below. Now, |
| + | everybody in this world seems different. One person varies from another in |
| + | appearance, personality, esteem, joys and sorrows etc. |
| + | So, is there a difference in the Jeevatmas nature too among people? i.e is one |
| + | jeevatma's nature different from another?? Is one |
| + | jeevatma eternal and the other not? ". In response, Krishna tells this sloka |
| + | that the atmas residing in all bodies are eternal and do not |
| + | perish, when the body perishes. Now, another question arises, when the bodies |
| + | are different (color, sex, creed, appearance etc), |
| + | how come the atma is same?? To remove this doubt only Sri Krishna tells that the |
| + | atman or dehi in every body or deham is eternal. We are witnessing changes |
| + | on the body but the soul remains the same. To understand this we should examine |
| + | closely our daily habits and experiences. We see variety of persons. |
| + | Some are fair, some black, some tall, some short, some females, some males, some |
| + | animals, etc. but all these differences do not change our habits. |
| + | One may be a millionaire and another a poor. But both see with their eyes only and |
| + | hear with their ears. There is no difference in these functions. |
| + | Educated or illiterate, one has to eat with his mouth only. So, God has not |
| + | permitted any difference in certain basic functions. We eat varieties of food and |
| + | vegetables. |
| + | They remain so till what we eat reaches the throat. After this the body |
| + | assimilates them as protein, vitamin or carbohydrates. This is scientific fact. |
| + | We do not eat as such fat or proteins. So, all differences are in the external |
| + | appearance only, such as brinjal [butter fruit] or lady�s finger [okra]. |
| + | The body, however, takes only the essence. So, only those, which appear different, |
| + | are all destroyed and atman, which is identical in every creature, |
| + | is eternal. |
| + | So Arjuna need not to worry that he may be destroying a destroyable atman. So, |
| + | in this sloka Krishna says, that Arjuna need not show grief. |
| + | (Note that as per bodily conception of relations, we do have to show compassion, |
| + | affection etc, but if we limit to just bodily ideas, then we end up being selfish |
| + | about |
| + | self, family etc, but if we look at if from jeevatma conception, our compassion |
| + | will not be limited just to few, but to everybody! and it will also ensure we |
| + | understand |
| + | the sense of duty without getting over emotional and binding). If we distinguish |
| + | atman from body, then we can be of real help to not merely our relatives but to |
| + | everyone |
| + | suffering. Relatives are body related. Only a perspective that all atmans are same |
| + | can make us render help to all. That is why in any calamity, there are some |
| + | persons |
| + | who concentrate on the things to do and do not go emotional. Such duty minded |
| + | persons are of real help. |
| + | Though the soul is immortal, violence is not encouraged, but at the time of war it |
| + | is not discouraged when there is actual need for it. That need must be justified |
| + | in terms of the |
| + | sanction of the Lord, and not capriciously. |
| + | 2-31: |
| + | sva-dharmam api ca-aveksya na vikam-pitum arhasi |
| + | dharmyad-dhi yuddhA shreyo anyat kshatriya-� sya na vidyate |
| + | "Considering your specific duty as a kshatriya, you should know that there is no |
| + | better engagement for you than fighting on religious principles; and so there is |
| + | no need for hesitation." |
| + | In the previous slokas Krishna adviced that Arjuna should not show love and undue |
| + | attention to the body, since it is temporary. |
| + | In this slokam, he focusses on the importance of doing one's dharma. As a |
| + | Kshatriya, it is Arjuna's duty to fight. There is no other |
| + | way for Moksham for a Kshatriya. Now, there is a seeming "controversy" here. |
| + | Here, Krishna says to Arjuna that he has to fight |
| + | the war, if he wants to gain Moksham. In some quarters, Gita is incorrectly |
| + | potrayed as a "war goading" book, which resulted in Mahabharat |
| + | war. The question is, is "fighting war" the only way for Arjuna to gain |
| + | moksham?? Not exactly. Krishna is telling Arjuna to do his Dharma. |
| + | And Kshatriya's duty is to fight a "righteous" war and not run away. Had Krishna |
| + | given Gita to a non-kshatriya, it would have been |
| + | a different dharma (and not war). Another question, doesn't war involve killing |
| + | and pain to other beings?? So, how would it be construed |
| + | as a path to Moksham?? The reality is, there are different kinds of "Himsa" in |
| + | this world (e.g. for example surgery on a body, mental |
| + | agony, woman giving birth to a child etc, grabbing property from a family etc). |
| + | Himsa is something which gives pain not just for the |
| + | present but also in the future. So, in this war, all the warriors who are |
| + | fighting get "veera" swargam. As long as Arjuna is fighting a |
| + | war justly and also a just war(whose end is just) then it's his dharma and is |
| + | assured of Moksham. |
| + | Out of the four orders of social administration, the second order, for the matter |
| + | of good administration, is called ksatriya. Ksat means hurt. One who gives |
| + | protection from harm |
| + | is called ksatriya (trayate--to give protection). There are two kinds of svadharmas, |
| + | specific duties. As long as one is not liberated, one has to perform the |
| + | duties of that particular |
| + | body in accordance with religious principles in order to achieve liberation. When |
| + | one is liberated, one's sva-dharma--specific duty--becomes spiritual and is not in |
| + | the material bodily |
| + | concept. In the bodily conception of life there are specific duties for the |
| + | brahmanas and ksatriyas respectively, and such duties are unavoidable. Sva-dharma |
| + | is ordained by the Lord, |
| + | and this will be clarified in the Fourth Chapter. On the bodily plane sva-dharma |
| + | is called varnasrama-dharma, or man's steppingstone for spiritual understanding. |
| + | Human civilization |
| + | begins from the stage of varnasrama-dharma, or specific duties in terms of the |
| + | specific modes of nature of the body obtained. Discharging one's specific duty in |
| + | any field of action in |
| + | accordance with varnasrama-dharma serves to elevate one to a higher status of |
| + | life. |
| + | 2-32: |
| + | yadrcchaya-ca upa-pannam svarga-dvaaram apaa-vrtam |
| + | sukhinah kshatriyAh partha labhante yuddham idrsam |
| + | "O Partha, happy are the kshatriyas to whom such fighting opportunities come |
| + | unsought, opening for them unhindered the doors of the heavenly planets." |
| + | The impending war is happening by itself, on its own, without any solicitation on |
| + | the part of Arjuna. Thus when it happens he and his brothers will be fighting on |
| + | the side of righteousness which constitutes the means for acquiring heavenly |
| + | happiness without obstacles. Such a war can only be fought by the most fortunate |
| + | of ksatriyas and Arjuna should understand his good fortune. |
| + | Krishna continues mentioning about the importance of Dharma here. He says Arjuna |
| + | is facing this war, not out of his own making, |
| + | but by "yaddrachaya" (Fate, God's grace), which is a gateway to heaven, which is a |
| + | blessing for the great and righteous Kshatriyas. |
| + | Now that question arises, which "swargam" is Krishna referring to here? Is it |
| + | Indra lokam etc?? No. Krishna is referring to Moksham |
| + | here. **This also point out to how to qualify a decision - Before we engage |
| + | ourselves in any work we will have to see these points: |
| + | Is this � legally allowed? |
| + | � After starting the work, will there be need for any unlawful activities? |
| + | � Is the objective a virtuous one or evil? |
| + | � Is there precedence by elders? |
| + | These four points are required to be examined before we embark on any activity. In |
| + | the present context, the fighting of this war has to answer all these quest |
| + | <nowiki>**</nowiki> Referring to Dharma Yuddham - The Lord himself went to war against tyrannical |
| + | demons to protect Dharma. |
| + | For e.g. Rama, Nrusimha, Vamana etc. |
| + | In the Parasara-smrti or religious codes made by Parasara, the great sage and |
| + | father of Vyasadeva, it is stated: |
| + | ksatriyo hi praja raksan sastra-panih pradandayan |
| + | nirjitya para-sainyadi ksitim dharmena palayet |
| + | "The ksatriya's duty is to protect the citizens from all kinds of difficulties, |
| + | and for that reason he has to apply violence in suitable cases for law and order. |
| + | Therefore he has to conquer the soldiers of inimical kings, and thus, with |
| + | religious principles, he should rule over the world." |
| + | Considering all aspects, Arjuna had no reason to refrain from fighting. If he |
| + | should conquer his enemies, he would enjoy the kingdom; and if he should die in |
| + | the battle, he would be elevated to the heavenly planets whose doors were wide |
| + | open to him. Fighting would be for his benefit in either case. |
| + | 2-33: |
| + | atha-cet-tvam imam dharmyam sangraamam na karishyasi |
| + | tatah sva-dharmam kIrtim ca hitva paapam avapsyasi |
| + | "If, however, you do not perform your duty of fighting for dharma, then you will |
| + | certainly incur sins for neglecting your duties and lose your reputation as a |
| + | fighter." |
| + | In the previous two slokas, Krishna explained to Arjuna that it is imperative for |
| + | him to follow his dharma as Kshatriya and fight the war which has come upon him as |
| + | "yaddhrachaya" |
| + | (thru divine chance) and that by doing so, he will achieve Moksham. |
| + | In this sloka and the next, Krishna says the sins that will befall Arjuna if he |
| + | does NOT fight the war. By listing the difficulties and sorrows he would |
| + | encounter if he slipped |
| + | from his expected duty, Sri Krishna is encouraging him to fight. In any act we |
| + | have to state the benefits by doing that and the ill effects by not doing. By |
| + | judging both one |
| + | has to conclude to perform an action. |
| + | Krishna terms this war as "Sangraamam" and not "Yuddham", in this slokam. Why? |
| + | Because the war has already started and the |
| + | armies ready to battle! Yudhdham means it could start even next day or after. But |
| + | sangramam means that is already started and when both sides are aligned and ready |
| + | to fight. Peace efforts could have been initiated before start of a fight but not |
| + | after it had started. Such efforts before the fight began would be appreciated; |
| + | but after it had started any such efforts would be branded as act of cowardice. So |
| + | Sri Krishna cautions that if Arjuna decided to withdraw from the war, he will be |
| + | defamed and then he would also be slipping from his expected dharma, resulting in |
| + | sins or papa to accumulate. So by abandoning the fight he will fail in his |
| + | swadharmam, that is his duty as Kshatriya to fight, and lose kirti or fame. Even |
| + | if he does not care for the fame, sins or papa will accrue for slipping from |
| + | swadharma. Sri Krishna lists the two, swadharma and kirti, as necessities for life |
| + | in this world and in the nether world. |
| + | Sri Krishna uses the words dharmyam sangraman, which means fight performed |
| + | righteously. This war is for establishing dharma, it is to be performed legally |
| + | and the outcome also is for dharma, a high objective. Since Arjuna, desirous of |
| + | preservation of dharma, this is a holy and upright war. The word sangramam is used |
| + | instead of yudhdham. . Why? Because it is as per the law, dharma shastras, the |
| + | results are worth it. If he doesn't fight this battle - all the fame(Keerti) he |
| + | achieved in the past as a warrior will be gone, giving |
| + | up his "svadharmam" as a Kshatriya, he will incur sin (Paapam Avaapsyaasi). |
| + | If through injudicious sentiment or bewildered ignorance Arjuna should fail to |
| + | perform his prescribed duty as a ksatriya by fighting for the sake of |
| + | righteousness; he would lose a most |
| + | excellent opportunity of attaining the heavenly spheres, he would lose his |
| + | reputation as a hero and he would have to accept great sinful reaction.Losing Fame |
| + | and Name (Keerti) |
| + | is a big loss in this Lokam for a Kshatriya and Arjuna will lose it, if he doesn't |
| + | battle. Not only that, even in the other worlds, Arjuna will be at loss, since by |
| + | shirking his duty , |
| + | he incurs sin and doesn't gain swargam. |
| + | Karma Yogam basically is doing one's duty as per his "ashrama dharma" |
| + | (Varanaashrama) and that leads to Bhakti Yogam. |
| + | If Arjuna is shedding his basic duty, he is not doing either Karma or Bhakti yogam |
| + | and that leads him to sin. **Abide by swadharma is what is advocated. |
| + | 2-34: |
| + | akirtim ca-api bhutani katha-yisyanti te �vyayaam |
| + | sambha-vitasya ca-akirtir maranad atiricyate |
| + | "Creatures will always speak of your infamy, and for a respectable person, |
| + | dishonor is worse than death." |
| + | In this slokam, Krishna continues detailing the ills which would befall if Arjuna |
| + | runs away from the war. He says that Arjuna |
| + | will lose his honor and reputation as great warrior which he gained from all times |
| + | (avyaayam) and be (kaithshyanti) ridiculed by all people |
| + | (Bhutaani) that he has run away from the battle. This infamy will be worse than |
| + | death for somebody as honored and reputable as |
| + | Arjuna. For a wise man, discrimination(vivekam), courage, bravery, calmness and |
| + | caution all need to be prevalent. Arjuna cannot |
| + | say that he doesn't care about his reputation and run away. It may be ok for a |
| + | common man, but for a great personality like Arjuna |
| + | with a legacy of honor, it will come off poorly. |
| + | Not only will happiness and fame elude him if he disregards his duty as a ksatriya |
| + | but the world opinion of those competent to judge and those incompetent as well |
| + | will chastise |
| + | him and speak of his act of disgrace public and privately. They will say Arjuna |
| + | was a coward for when the battle was about to begin he gave only excuses and |
| + | retreated hastily |
| + | from the battlefield. The Supreme Lord Krishna is telling him that forever history |
| + | will brand him for cowardice. If Arjuna was to reply that what the public think is |
| + | of no consequence to |
| + | him, the Supreme Lord neutralises that by stating that for a person of honour |
| + | possessing the qualities of heroism, determination, puissance, courage etc. which |
| + | are all contrary to |
| + | cowardice to have to accept infamy is worse than death. If he was to acquire |
| + | disgrace of this kind death for him would certainly be much better. If reasoning |
| + | further one was to |
| + | present the question of how ignominy could attach itself to one who is already a |
| + | renowned hero and whose resignation from the battle field is prompted only by |
| + | motives of respect |
| + | for elders and compassion to friends and relatives then the next verse 34 |
| + | neutralises that argument. |
| + | 2-35: |
| + | bhayad ranad uparatam mamsyante tvaam maha-rathah |
| + | yesham ca tvam bahu-matah: bhutva yaasyasi laaghavam |
| + | "The great generals who have highly esteemed your name and fame will think that |
| + | you have left the battlefield out of fear only, and thus they will consider you |
| + | irrelevant." |
| + | "Astaana Sneham" - Showing compassion to the wrong places and towards the wrong |
| + | people, like Arjuna is doing by showing |
| + | compassion etc towards Duryodhana etc. In this slokam, Krishna responds to |
| + | Arjuna's doubt from the previous slokam. Arjuna asks |
| + | how can he get dishonor when he is withdrawing from the battle only out of love |
| + | and compassion towards his relatives and avoiding |
| + | bloodshed. Krishna responds about Arjuna(Tvam), the mahaarathis(warriors like |
| + | Duryodhan, Karna) etc will think (manyate) that |
| + | out of fear (bhayaat) that you ran (uparatam) from the battle (ranaat) and for |
| + | those (yesham bhutvah) who have been thinking |
| + | greatly (bahumata) of you, will think in the futurue (yaasyasi) lightly (laagavam) |
| + | of you and treat you with contempt. Despite going through |
| + | many humilations in losing the kingdom through treachery etc, Arjuna and other |
| + | pandavas didn't lose their honor or reputation as great |
| + | warriors among the common people, because they behaved with honor! Now, running |
| + | away from the battle, would make him lose |
| + | all the reputation. |
| + | There is a thin dividing line between "patience and compassion" and "cowardly |
| + | and weak". If somebody is very patient and tolerant, |
| + | it can be sometimes miscontrued as weakness and cowardliness. In this case, it's |
| + | possible that great understanding souls like Bheeshma |
| + | and Drona would understand Arjuna's dilemma, but "Duryodhana and Karna etc" would |
| + | not think it that way. Now, Arjuna says, he |
| + | doesn't care about what Duryodhan etc thinks and would prefer to not battle. |
| + | Krishna says, it's not just about Duryodhana, but even |
| + | the common man will perceive Arjuna as running away from battle and not doing his |
| + | duty. We should thus understand to differentiate between mercy and patience |
| + | on one hand and incompetence and cowardice on the other. |
| + | |
| + | 2-36: |
| + | avacya vAdams-ca bahun! vadisyanti tava-ahitah: |
| + | nindan-tas tava samarthyam ! tato dukha-taram nu kim |
| + | "Your enemies will describe you in many unkind words and scorn your ability. What |
| + | could be more painful for you? |
| + | This slokam is also advising Arjuna not to show "Astaana Sneham". His |
| + | enemies(ahitAh) will talk (vaadan cya) a lot (Bahun |
| + | Vadishyanti) of unkind and fabricated (avAcya) words. His abilities (saamarthyam) |
| + | will be vilified (nindantah). For Arjuna who is so proud |
| + | about his prowess and "Gandhivaam" would not be able to suffer this ignominy of |
| + | being humilated by his enemies with slanderous remarks. |
| + | That is what Krishna is warning Arjuna against. When a friend or wellwishers pass |
| + | remarks like it, we can tolerate it, because they are |
| + | close ones. But, when a enemy is vilifiying, a warrior like Arjuna cannot bear it. |
| + | Now, Arjuna may think, Ok, so what if my enemies |
| + | poke fun at me. Krishna also gives a vieled warning here, saying that Arjuna may |
| + | then get provoked and fight the war and if he does so, |
| + | then he will be potrayed as someone who is fighting due to being slighted and not |
| + | for the people. |
| + | A question may arise : Krishna himself "ran away" from battle with Jarasandha and |
| + | went and built Dwarka city. Arjuna may have the |
| + | question on why he is suggesting Arjuna to fight and not quit. Sri Krishna was |
| + | born in Gokulam and after ten years, He lived in Mathura for some years. But King |
| + | Jarasanda |
| + | invaded Mathura several times. Seventeen times he invaded and Sri Krishna |
| + | defeated him every time. Sri Krishna requested His brother Sri Balarama, to go to |
| + | west seashore |
| + | and reclaim land from the sea and establish a new city of Dwaraka. Sri Balarama |
| + | did not agree. When next time Jarasanda invaded Mathura, Sri Krishna ran away from |
| + | Mathura. |
| + | Arjuna remembered this incident. But there are two main differences in the two |
| + | incidents. Firstly, rules, which we follow, cannot be applied on the Lord. |
| + | Secondly, Sri Krishna |
| + | had vanquished Jarasanda several times and He was merely acting as though He was |
| + | running away from Jarasanda out of fear. Here, for Arjuna this is the first time |
| + | to fight |
| + | with these people. So, how can he run away and compare this with Sri Krishna�s |
| + | action? |
| + | 2-37: |
| + | hato va prapsyasi svargam jitva va bhoksyase mahim |
| + | tasmad uttistha kaunteya yuddhaya krta-niscayah |
| + | "O son of Kunti, either you will be killed on the battlefield and attain the |
| + | heavenly planets, or you will conquer and enjoy the earthly kingdom. Therefore get |
| + | up and fight with |
| + | determination." |
| + | "Tasmad Uttishtha Kaunteya" - Thus! exhorts Krishna to Arjuna to Stand up with |
| + | determination (krta) to fight (YuddhAya), in this |
| + | slokam. If you get killed, you will achieve Swargam (Hatoh VA prApasyasi Svargam) |
| + | and if you win, you will enjoy this worldly kingdom |
| + | (jitA vA bhoksyase mahim). If you don't fight, you will not achieve either glory |
| + | here nor in other worlds. He addresses Arjuna as |
| + | "Kunti Putra" (Kaunteya), because Kunti is renowed for her courage and devotion. |
| + | In addition, Kunti is Krishna's dear aunty and as such |
| + | it becomes Krishna's responsibility to protect Krishna. |
| + | Related comments: Some may say that Asoka gave up war and violence, whereas |
| + | Krishna is prompting Arjuna for war. Asoka |
| + | actually gave up wars etc, after fighting numerous wars. Whereas Arjuna's Dharma |
| + | here is to wage war against Kauravas to protect |
| + | his people and ensure the kingdom is not ruled by crooked Kauravas. In addition, |
| + | when both opposition factions are in agreement |
| + | to call of war, it may make sense to back off (eg: Alexander and Paurus etc), but |
| + | in this case, there is no such signal from Kauravas. |
| + | Another question is, Arjuna didn't have similar qualms when warring with Kauravas |
| + | in the past (Virata yuddham during vanavas), but |
| + | why is he having the fear now?? In the past, he didn't have to worry about |
| + | killing Drona or Bheeshma or other close relatives, so |
| + | there was no issue. |
| + | 2-38: |
| + | Sukha-dukhe samEy krtva, lAbhaAlabhau jayaAjayau, |
| + | tathO yudhAya yujasva, naivam pApam avApsyAsi. |
| + | This begins the prelude to KARMA YOGAM section. Krishna says Arjuna will not |
| + | incur sun (Naivam pApam avApsyasi), if he just |
| + | engages in war just for the sake of war (YuddhAya yujasvya) and not with sense of |
| + | attachment or results. What attachment or results |
| + | is Krishna referring to here - be equanimous in joy and sorrow i.e no need to |
| + | feel joy by killing enemies or felling them or no need |
| + | to feel sorrow in felling opponents such as Bhishma etc. We cannot equate Joy and |
| + | Sorrow as one, but the feelings and reactions |
| + | which emanate in the face of joy and sorrow - those feelings is something we need |
| + | to control and look at it with some sense of |
| + | detachment. The same sense of equanimity should also be there in the face of gain |
| + | and loss, victory and defeat. |
| + | This is in response to Arjuna's lament that he doesn't care about kingdom, winning |
| + | etc and doesn't want to fight. In response, Krishna |
| + | said that Arjuna should fight , since it's his duty, which will result in his |
| + | gaining heavenly kingdom (Moksham). In this slokam, Krishna |
| + | says that Arjuna should fight as a sense of duty and not get disturbed by |
| + | dualities such as joy & sorrow, victory & defeat, gain&loss. |
| + | This is a important qualification for a KarmaYogi! Krishna says that Arjuna should |
| + | fight as a Karma yogi, as a sense of duty, without |
| + | consideration or attachment or disturbed by gain or loss, victory or defeat etc |
| + | and when he does it, there will be no incurring of sin. |
| + | He who acts for his own sense gratification, either in goodness or in passion, is |
| + | subject to reaction, good or bad. |
| + | Knowing the immortal eternal soul to be that which is distinct and independent |
| + | from the physical body, uncontaminated with the qualities pertaining to the |
| + | material existence but connected to those qualities which are spiritual in nature |
| + | and eternal; maintaining an equipoised mind in the various conditions of pleasure |
| + | and pain, loss and gain, victory or defeat being devoid of any fruitive desire or |
| + | hankering for any reward or remuneration, such as going to the heavenly worlds, |
| + | fight this righteous battle as a matter of duty which needs to be discharged. One |
| + | who is situated in wisdom with their mind properly composed in this manner while |
| + | executing their prescribed duties will incur no sinful reactions and thus will be |
| + | eligible for salvation from material existence. Sinful reactions is the root of |
| + | all suffering and the cause of perpetual bondage in the cycle of birth and death |
| + | in the material existence. |
| + | Arjuna is baffled on how he can do it. Krishna points out that as Rama in the |
| + | previous avtaar, he followed this same principles!! |
| + | 2-39: |
| + | esA te a'bhijitha sAnkhye! buddhir yoge tv imAm Srnu ; |
| + | buddhyA yukto yayA pArtha, karma-bandham prahAsyasi. |
| + | "Thus far I have described atman to you through analytical study. Now listen as I |
| + | explain it in terms of working without trivial results. O son of Pritha, when you |
| + | act with such |
| + | knowledge you can free yourself from the bondage of karma." |
| + | This sloka starts the KARMA yogam section, where krishna expounds on Karma yoga. |
| + | Gita is the extraction of the sayings of Upanishad. |
| + | Upanishad - UPA(near), Nishana(getting to Brahman) . Upanishad tells us the |
| + | reality of Brahman and the ways to reach close to Brahman. |
| + | The ways it propounds is Karma Yogam, Jnaana Yogam, Bhakti Yogam. In this it's |
| + | generally considered that Bhakti Yogam is primary |
| + | and Karma and Jnaana Yogam are it's ancillary i.e for Bhakti, one needs Karma |
| + | and Jnaana anushtaanam as pre-requisites. |
| + | nstead of practicing each separately, it is better to have one as the pradhanam |
| + | [main] and the other two as angam [branches or ancillaries]. Just like in our |
| + | degree courses |
| + | we have one subject, say Chemistry, as main and study say, mathematics and |
| + | physics, as ancillaries. Similarly, if one decides to seek Moksham through |
| + | Karmayoga, |
| + | then one has to have Gyanayoga and Bhakthiyoga as ancillaries. But there is a |
| + | difference. In the education system, pass in the main can be done without studying |
| + | the ancillaries. |
| + | Whereas, in seeking Moksham, if Bhakthiyoga has to be practiced, then one has to |
| + | practice Karmayoga and Gyanayoga. Without these two, a person cannot practice |
| + | Bhakthiyoga. |
| + | Upanishad says - Atma Drashtavaya, Stortavyaa, mantvyaya, nidhistavyaaya - i.e we |
| + | should constantly, deeply, exclusively hear about |
| + | the lord for reaching him. Question is, we also need to know how to conduct |
| + | ourselves in this world, while we seek to achieve |
| + | salvation(Moksham). The primary requirement for it is to realise that body is |
| + | temporary and soul is eternal and salvation lies in |
| + | getting out of the cycle of birth and death. If one doesn't realise this, then |
| + | it's not possible to get away from this never ending cycle |
| + | and we will be forever caught in this web of material existence. So, the first |
| + | step is to realise that Soul is eternal and body is |
| + | temporary. To realize Paramatma, atman has to listen about Him. Then, contemplate |
| + | on what was listened to. Then meditate without interruption , but with |
| + | concentration. |
| + | Such continuous meditation is called Bhakthi and this results in merging with the |
| + | Paramatma. This will make the atman to feel happy in union with and sorrow in |
| + | separation from God. Thereafter, the soul departs this body and this world and |
| + | reaches Moksham and remains with Him in eternal happiness. It is a stairway to |
| + | Moksham. All born cannot immediately go for |
| + | Moksham. In this world lots of good things are to be done and this life has to be |
| + | happily spent. But the objective should be to reach Moksham after this life |
| + | without the perils of another birth. |
| + | When will this thought come? First, one should realize that this body is |
| + | perishable and atman is indestructible. If one thinks atman and body are same, |
| + | when body perishes, atman |
| + | also will perish and then there would be no need for Moksham or worry about |
| + | rebirth. So, this basic knowledge that atman and body are different is essential. |
| + | Not merely accepting |
| + | that they are separate, it should be firmly believed that atman is eternal and |
| + | body is destroyable. Further, it should be realized that in this life happiness |
| + | and sorrow are mixed. |
| + | The natural feeling of the atman is always happy. But when inside a body in this |
| + | earth, mixed feelings are unavoidable. So, the objective should be to get the |
| + | everlasting |
| + | happiness, its natural quality. This pursuit is necessary. |
| + | Next step is to know that Soul is owned(adimai) by Paramatma and we are not |
| + | owners or independent. This realization about atman and body is the first step in |
| + | the stairway. |
| + | This step alone cannot take to the top. The next step is to realize that this |
| + | atman is servant of God. Paramatma is the ruler and atman is ruled. Therefore, |
| + | atman has to |
| + | cling to the Feet of the Lord. Instead of saying that Karmayaoga, Gyanayoga and |
| + | Bhakthyoga are various paths to reach Moksham, Bhakthyoga is the main. |
| + | Visiting temples, chanting His names and helping His devotees, will all constitute |
| + | Bhakthiyoga. For this as main one needs Karma [action] and Gyana [knowledge]. |
| + | These are needed in any activity. Ways to reach the lord are Karma, Jnaana and |
| + | Bhakti Yogam. Rather than saying three yogams are seperate and independent, we |
| + | can say |
| + | Bhakti yogam is the primary way to reach lord and this involves singing, chanting, |
| + | visting holy places, helping others, being close to devotees etc. |
| + | Bhakti yogam has two angas, karma and Jnaana - it requires discipline and |
| + | knowledge. It is similar to - for riding a vehicle, one needs knowledge that |
| + | vehicle |
| + | requires petrol etc to run, need to operate clutch and brake together, brake to |
| + | stop the vehicle and in addition one needs the skills to operate |
| + | the vehicle. Similarly for Bhakti, one needs knowledge and discipline. ANd to |
| + | even start this course, the primary pre-requisite |
| + | is the basic knowledge that Atma is Nityam and Body is temporary. |
| + | Krishna has followed the same pattern. From slokas 2-12 onwards to sloka 2-30, |
| + | Krishna has emphasized that Atma is Nityam and temporary nature of the body. |
| + | From Slokams 2-39 to 2-51, Krishna expounds on Karma Yogam and after that he |
| + | expounds |
| + | Jnaana Yogam and in Chapters 7,8,9 he expounds on Bhakti Yogam and in the later |
| + | chapters he explains the ways for Moksha. |
| + | So, Geeta has been laid out in this manner - Initially in the second chapter |
| + | (slokas 12 to 30), it tells us the nature of the soul and the |
| + | temporary nature of body, since this is the primary pre-requisite. Next, it |
| + | explains the ways of Karma Yogam i.e how to do our |
| + | duties. NExt, it explains Jnaana yogam (knowledge). Next, it explains Bhakti |
| + | yogam (which needs knowledge of soul, how to do our |
| + | duty, knowledge) and next it explains ways for Moksham. |
| + | In this slokam, |
| + | "esa te abhihitA SANKHYE!" - note, esA te i.e in the slokas (2-12 to 2-30), i |
| + | have explained (abhitha) the philosophy of Sankhye!. |
| + | Sankhya means "buddhi" and Sankhyam is "the Atma which is understood by Buddhi" |
| + | and Sankhye is the philosophy which describes |
| + | the real nature of the soul (i.e it is nityam, it is eternal). I.e i have |
| + | explained about Sankya Yoga(the true nature of the soul). |
| + | 'Sankhya' means 'intellect,' and the truth about the Atman, which is determinable |
| + | by the intellect, is 'Sankhyam'. Concerning the nature of the self which has to be |
| + | known, whatever Buddhi has to be taught, has been taught to you in the passage |
| + | beginning with, 'It is not that I did not exist' (II.12) and ending with the |
| + | words, 'Therefore, you shall not grieve for any being' (II.30). |
| + | Krishna says - "yayA buddhyA yuktah" - that buddhih (intelligence) by which , |
| + | "Karma bandham prahAsyasi" you can |
| + | released from bondage of reaction - that knowledge (Karma yogam) will be explained |
| + | to him. |
| + | The disposition of mind (Buddhi) which is required for the performance of works |
| + | preceded by knowledge of the self and which thus constitutes the means of |
| + | attaining release, that is here called by the term Yoga. It will be clearly told |
| + | later on, 'Work done with desire for fruits is far inferior to work done with |
| + | evennes of mind' (II. 49). |
| + | "buddhir yoge tv imAm srunu" - Now Listen(Srnu) about yogE buddhi (karma yogam). |
| + | What Buddhi or attitude of mind is required for making your act deserve the name |
| + | of Yoga, listen to it now. Endowed with that knowledge, you will be able to cast |
| + | away the bondage of Karma. 'Karma-bandha' means the bondage due to Karma i.e., the |
| + | bondage of Samsara. |
| + | 'Sankhya' means 'intellect,' and the truth about the Atman, which is determinable |
| + | by the intellect, is 'Sankhyam'. Concerning the nature of the self which has to be |
| + | known, whatever Buddhi |
| + | has to be taught, has been taught to you in the passage beginning with, 'It is not |
| + | that I did not exist' (II.12) and ending with the words, 'Therefore, you shall not |
| + | grieve for any being' (II.30). |
| + | The disposition of mind (Buddhi) which is required for the performance of works |
| + | preceded by knowledge of the self and which thus constitutes the means of |
| + | attaining release, that is here |
| + | called by the term Yoga. It will be clearly told later on, 'Work done with desire |
| + | for fruits is far inferior to work done with evennes of mind' (II. 49). What |
| + | Buddhi or attitude of mind is required |
| + | for making your act deserve the name of Yoga, listen to it now. Endowed with that |
| + | knowledge, you will be able to cast away the bondage of Karma. 'Karma-bandha' |
| + | means the bondage |
| + | due to Karma i.e., the bondage of Samsara. |
| + | Now question comes up, Arjuna is not intrested in fighting. So, why is Krishna |
| + | talking about Sankha Yogam, Karma yogam etc, rather |
| + | than just exhorting Arjuna to fight?? Krishna first explains thru Sankha Yogam |
| + | that Souls are eternal and body is temporary, thus |
| + | killing in a just war is not sinful and Arjuna shouldn't go weak at the thought of |
| + | killing relatives etc. Next, Krishna addresses the |
| + | concern of Arjuna about not being intrested in fruits of war etc, by talking about |
| + | Karma Yogam and explaining that Arjuna need not |
| + | fight for fruitive results, but a Saadhanam for Moksham. Waging just war is a |
| + | Kshatriya Dharma and is his karma yogam. |
| + | Karma Yogam: |
| + | Introduction: One can do a thing anywhere, or as prescribed in vedas or not |
| + | prescribed according to vedas. But, if one performs |
| + | a duty in a "loukeeka" fashion, one doesn't get any benefit other than material |
| + | benefits. But, if one does one's duty as per the viddhi of |
| + | vedas, |
| + | eg> when we bath at home, under a tap etc, there is no additional benefit, apart |
| + | from cleaning body. But, if we take a dip in ganges and |
| + | other temple pushkarinis, the body not only gets cleaned, but we are also blessed |
| + | with washing away of sins. Why? Because it's |
| + | prescribed in vedas. |
| + | What constitutes Karma yogam - All our daily activities, eating, sleeping, |
| + | working, helping etc basically constitute Karma yogam. Simple? |
| + | Right? Yes. But, this needs to be done as per the prescription of Vedas and not |
| + | do anything which is NOT prescribed in the vedas. |
| + | And it needs to be done in full faith and spirit and also NOT with sense of |
| + | attachment. For eg: if one takes bath in Pushkarini, |
| + | without any belief in it's powers, then it will not help. Again, What is Karma |
| + | yoga? It is eating, sleeping, working, etc. Nothing extra is required to be done. |
| + | But these activities are |
| + | to be done as prescribed in shastras. This is very important. If we do our |
| + | activities according to the dos and don ts of shastras, it is � karmayoga. If we do |
| + | karma yoga we are |
| + | sure to attain Moksham. Shastras are instructions given by God. He has told that |
| + | He liberates the one who faithfully follows His instructions. Once we have that |
| + | belief that |
| + | we are acting according to the stipulations of the Lord, He also will erase all |
| + | our sins and make us to reach our natural state of happiness,Moksham. In these |
| + | instructions |
| + | one is asked to eat, sleep and work. Nowhere the shastras ask us not to do |
| + | anything else. The person instructed [by shastras] could be a bachelor or married |
| + | or sanyasin |
| + | or a beast or bird. Whoever be, if the prescribed action is performed with a firm |
| + | belief that this will yield Moksham, that result will be achieved. A bath in this |
| + | pond with a belief |
| + | that it will only remove my body dirt, then this action will not get Moksham. But |
| + | same action with a firm belief that I will get Moksham, by bathing in this pond, |
| + | will get Moksham. |
| + | So a steadfast belief is to be there along with the vidhi. |
| + | So: Karma Yogam constitutes: |
| + | <nowiki>*</nowiki> Performing duties which are prescribed and NOT doing anything which is against |
| + | prescribed |
| + | <nowiki>*</nowiki> Belief in it and doing it as Bhagavan's viddhi that it's a means for moksham. |
| + | (eg: not having faith while bathing in holy waters, but just doing it because |
| + | it's prescribed!) |
| + | (eg: Marrying, having kids, performing family duties etc should be done as |
| + | Karma yogam, since it is prescribed and do it as a means |
| + | of moksham i.e just as duty). |
| + | Karma can be divided into three: |
| + | <nowiki>*</nowiki> Nitya Karma - to be practiced daily. Tharpanam, Daana-Dharama(Charity), |
| + | Festival celebration |
| + | <nowiki>*</nowiki> Naimitika Karma - to be performed due to certain reasons or in certain |
| + | occasions |
| + | <nowiki>*</nowiki> Kaamya Karma - Doing things with desire for material benefits, to achieve |
| + | certain goals eg: passing exam, marriage etc |
| + | All these karmas or actions are stipulated. These have to be done uninterruptedly. |
| + | Performing annual ceremonies [shraddham] for deceased forefathers [pithru], |
| + | celebrating festivals, etc. |
| + | are all Karma yoga. Why Sri Krishna is encouraging Arjuna to fight? Because it is |
| + | stipulated for him. He is asked to do what he learnt. So, Karma yoga can be |
| + | performed by anybody. |
| + | Sri Krishna lauds the greatness of Karma yoga in the next sloka. |
| + | 2-40: |
| + | nehA-abhikrama nAso-asti ! Pratya-vAyo na vidyate! |
| + | svalpam apya-sya dharmasya! trAyateh mahato bhayAt! |
| + | "In this endeavor [karma yoga] there is no loss or lessening for a little |
| + | advancement on this path and can protect one from the most dangerous type of |
| + | fear." |
| + | In this slokam, Krishna expounds the benefit and greatness of Karma Yogam. Just |
| + | like a Parent tells a kid that what glory would be, |
| + | if he achieves 99% marks , to intrest the kid in studying, similarly Krishna |
| + | tells the greatness of Karma Yogam to Arjuna, before |
| + | explaining the details of Karma Yogam. |
| + | "NehA abikramoa-Nasao Asti" - There is no loss in this Karma yogam. eg. |
| + | unlike leaves which "lapse", this doesn't lapse. |
| + | It "carries" over it's benefits. For eg: if we follow for sometime and |
| + | discontinue, the benefits of whatever we did will not lapse. |
| + | One percent of work done in Krishna consciousness bears permanent results, so that |
| + | the next beginning is from the point of |
| + | two percent, whereas in material business, without a hundred percent profit there |
| + | is no success. or it's like writing an exam- attempt |
| + | an answer but even if you do not get the right answer or not complete it, even |
| + | then the examiner puts marks based on how much |
| + | you wrote correctly. |
| + | "pratyavAyo na vidyate" - Another fear is, if we stop karma in between, we incur |
| + | sins etc. Arjuna is scared that incuring sin would make |
| + | it a bigger issue and invite additional sins. Krishna says here that, there is no |
| + | need to fear and it does not happen that way, as long |
| + | as one performs duties with selfless spirit as a sense of duty for Moksham and not |
| + | for material gains etc. |
| + | "Svalpma apsya Dharmasya" - Even performing a little will still help. Atleast do |
| + | svalpa! (how kind of krishna!) |
| + | "TrAyateh Mahatoh BhayAt" - Doing the above can protect one from the greatest |
| + | danger and fear of samsara. |
| + | The Supreme Lord Krishna reveals that even the slightest, most minuscule effort |
| + | made regarding this karma yoga of performing actions without desiring fruitive |
| + | results is never in vain. |
| + | The word abhikrama is derived from arambha meaning any beginning as in any effort. |
| + | The word nasa means destruction as in loss of, thus the effort itself is the means |
| + | to a guaranteed |
| + | result. Not even is failure accrued when a righteous action is begun but is unable |
| + | to be completed due to circumstances and absolutely no negative effect will accrue |
| + | even when a righteous |
| + | action is interrupted at its very commencement. Even a the most minute righteous |
| + | action performed without desiring fruitive results saves one with spiritual |
| + | knowledge from the great fear |
| + | of the endless cycle of birth and death in the material existence. This same view |
| + | is further elaborated later in chapter six, verse 40 describing that in this world |
| + | or the next there is no loss or |
| + | dimunition for the aspirant. |
| + | |
| + | 2-41: |
| + | vyavasAyA-atmikA buddhir! eka-iha kuru-nandana! |
| + | Bahu-sAka hy anantAs-ca ! buddhayO-A'vyava-sAyinam! |
| + | "Those who are on this path[ with Moksham as objective] are resolute in purpose, |
| + | and their aim is one. O beloved child of the Kurus, the intelligence of those who |
| + | are irresolute [performing |
| + | kamya karmas]is many-branched." |
| + | So far, Lord has mentioned two key things about Karma Yoga : One is the |
| + | performer should do it without attachment to results (Labah-Alabah Jaya-Ajayaoh!) |
| + | & show equanimity |
| + | to joy & sorrow and the second is there is no dimunition of results (Na-iha- |
| + | Abhikramoh Nasao-Asti) even with some effort and also if the effort (Pratya |
| + | Vayoh na drishyateh) could |
| + | not be completed due to various reasons, there will be no Dosham. It will give |
| + | benefits till the extent it's done and protect one from the dangers of this |
| + | samsara. |
| + | Krishna splits karma into two types. One which is focussed on Moksham and other |
| + | on Kaamyam-material gains. Krishna says the |
| + | greatness of doing karma related to Moksham is superior and preferable to to |
| + | kaamyam gains. Now this may see tough - why should we |
| + | only focus on Moksha karmam? We have so many desires. To explain this further, |
| + | swami says, it's similar to schooling. Till Class 12, |
| + | we learn lot of subjects. But, from college, we focus on few subjects and as we |
| + | go further up in education, we focus on fewer subjects |
| + | and then finally in PHD , we focus on only ONE subject and one goal. Similarly, |
| + | in world, if we keep pursuing material desires, it keeps |
| + | growing and growing and we get mired into it without any end (education, marriage, |
| + | kids, fame, career etc) and dissipates our focus |
| + | on the actual goal (moksham and Brahmam). To avoid this, our focus should be on |
| + | that Karma which is on the path of Moksham. |
| + | Kaamyam Karma are variegated because there is no end to material desires. But, |
| + | the Moksha karma always remains the same(eka), since |
| + | it's never changing. Soul is the servant of God. Atman has total knowledge. |
| + | Atman s nature is happiness. So atman cannot waste pursuits after � trivial results. |
| + | If one remembers |
| + | these and performs the actions or karma with a steadfast mind, then that knowledge |
| + | will be one or same. Whereas since the kamya karmas are not performed with the |
| + | right |
| + | knowledge of atman, they will all be diversified and will not lead to a finite |
| + | result. Convergence only can lead to a single objective. So Arjuna is advised to |
| + | take up only those karmas, |
| + | which will get him Moksham. A clear and proper understanding of the atman alone |
| + | will enable to perform karma yoga.The key thing is the right disposition of |
| + | mind i.e "vyaavasayika-atmika buddhi" i.e knowledge of the true nature of soul |
| + | while doing any act and being focussed on pleasing the lord and not for material |
| + | gains. |
| + | One should be focussed (single minded - vyaavasayika) with the unshakeable |
| + | conviction and disposition of mind (buddhi) of |
| + | "atma swaaroopam" ( i.e i am subservient to the Lord, jeevatma has knowledge, |
| + | body and soul are different) and be focussed ONLY (eka) |
| + | on Moksham and not be many-branched or all over the place (bahushaaka) i.e |
| + | immersed in worldy desires, being stuck in material and part |
| + | spiritual pursuits or doing endless karmas for worldly desires and thoughts, it |
| + | will lead to nowhere and we will be stuck in samsara taking |
| + | repeated births. One who is not FIRMLY fixed in mind is diverted by various |
| + | types of fruitive acts. |
| + | The word vyavasaya derived from nischaya means certainty. The unshakeable |
| + | conviction one has of such a decisive nature is that which the aspirant of |
| + | salvation possesses and |
| + | which can be understood by the actions they perform. The strength of this |
| + | unshakeable conviction is directly connected to one's understanding of the eternal |
| + | reality of the soul's immortality. |
| + | Fragmented and not evolved is that mind which entertains ideas of performing |
| + | actions for the reaping of results. People of this type vaguely know that the soul |
| + | exists, although |
| + | mistakenly attributing it as being part of the body and no more knowledge is |
| + | required in their case as their material wishes for wealth and fame and even |
| + | heaven can be obtained without having accurate, precise knowledge of the actual |
| + | transcendental position of the eternal soul. |
| + | But on the other hand the conviction of certainty is unique in its singleness of |
| + | purpose and focused aim. All actions executed by such a living entity has for its |
| + | sole objective salvation and the |
| + | means is yoga which is the science of the individual consciousness attaining |
| + | communion with the Ultimate Consciousness. This is the essence of the Vedic |
| + | scriptures which lead to this |
| + | conclusion and such being the case there can arise only one unshakeable conviction |
| + | to one possessing spiritual insight. For the fulfilment of one single attainment |
| + | being salvation, all actions |
| + | are dedicated by one fixed in the firm resolve for salvation. Hence as the primary |
| + | objective of the Vedic scriptures is one, the firm resolve as regarding the |
| + | purpose of all actions can be but |
| + | one as in the case for example of the six different kinds of rituals called Darsapurnamasa. |
| + | Three rituals are to be performed on the new moon and three are to be |
| + | performed on the full moon. In their performance they all differ in regards to |
| + | execution yet they may be said to constitute a single aim for when all are |
| + | directed to obtaining a single fruit all there seperate |
| + | differences may be understood as part of a whole. |
| + | Whereas in the case of those with fragmented and unfocused minds who engage in |
| + | various activities each intended to acquire some result such as heaven, wealth, |
| + | fame, power and so forth and so on the schemes are endless as the desires are |
| + | endless. Even the results are diverse as in the case again of the Darsa-purnamasa, |
| + | for although the rituals are directed to be performed for the obtainment of a |
| + | specific goal, yet they confer minor benefits as well such as good health, vigor |
| + | and long life. Thus it is stated that the mentality of those not evolved is |
| + | endless and ramifying. |
| + | The conclusion of this verse is that all nitya or daily rites and all naimittika |
| + | or occasional rites for specific times prescribed in the Vedic scriptures shall be |
| + | performed with the sole aim of |
| + | ultimate salvation as the purpose. Although each rite individually is capable of |
| + | giving its own temporary, material reward; but all such rewards are to be ignored |
| + | while holding focus solely on |
| + | salvation. |
| + | As for fruitive rites and rituals desiring some material benediction, these shall |
| + | be performed in the manner prescribed for the four varnas or classes of cultured |
| + | life being brahmana, ksatriya, vaisya, and sudra in the four asramas or stages of |
| + | cultured life being brahmacarya or celibate life, grihasta or married life, |
| + | vanaprastha or renunounced life and sannyasa or dedication and focus solely on the |
| + | Supreme Lord. Accordingly they should also resign the acquired results of their |
| + | efforts in favor of salvation. |
| + | In the next three verses will be seen that those who engage solely in fruitive |
| + | activities are condemned. |
| + | 2-42: yAm imAm puspitAm vAcam pravadanty avi-pascitah! veda-vAda-ratAh-pArtha |
| + | nAnyad astiti vAdinah |
| + | 2-43 kAm-AtmAnaha svarga-parA ! janma-karma-phala-pradAm kriyA-visesa-bahulAm |
| + | bhogAisvarya-gatim prati |
| + | 2-44 bhog-Aiswarya prasaktAnAm tayApahrta cetasAm! vyavasAya-AtmikA buddhih |
| + | samAdhau-na-vidhIyateh! |
| + | Our desires can be categorized into three: |
| + | <nowiki>*</nowiki>This world desires - Lookoh Bina Ruchih! Different types of desires in this |
| + | world. Eating well, marrying, property, hobbies, career etc. |
| + | It's all based on misunderstanding that body and soul are the same. |
| + | <nowiki>*</nowiki>Swargam desires - This is the desire for swargam i.e enjoying other worlds |
| + | like devas. This is based on the understanding that |
| + | body and soul are different |
| + | <nowiki>*</nowiki>Moksham - This is the desire for Moksham i.e breaking the eternal cycle of |
| + | births. |
| + | Thus earthly pleasures, heavenly pleasures and the endless pleasures in Moksham |
| + | are before us. Krishna divides this desires into two: |
| + | <nowiki>*</nowiki>Desires of this world and other world |
| + | <nowiki>*</nowiki>Desire for Moksham |
| + | He tells Arjuna that the various karmas performed for attaining the |
| + | earthly/heavenly pleasures, will lead one to nowhere. But a single-minded karma |
| + | with Moksham as target, will progress in a single direction and there will be no |
| + | need to do the karmas for the earthly/ heavenly benefits. That will be karma yoga. |
| + | Here we may think like this. All may not be interested in Moksham. Besides, if Sri |
| + | Krishna declares that by doing karma yoga one will soon get Moksham, many will |
| + | withdraw from practicing karma yoga or even listening to these lectures. People |
| + | will discourage younger ones from listening to Gita lecture as they may think that |
| + | Moksham will be attained immediately, and they may not be able to do the expected |
| + | domestic duties. So, it is emphasized that merely knowing Gita will not |
| + | immediately fetch Moksham and only after the prescribed life is over one will |
| + | attain Moksham. |
| + | In the previous slokam, Krishna mentioned that one needs to be focussed on the |
| + | desire for moksham and do duties accordingly. Now, a question arises on how we can |
| + | do this, while |
| + | living in this material plane, where we are forced to do material duties to |
| + | survive and thrive ?? |
| + | Krishna responds that, by immersing only on material desires, we will definitely |
| + | NOT get anywhere close to Moksham. |
| + | But, if we focus on moksham and do all the worldly duties, Krishna will take |
| + | care of the material needs and we don't need to worry |
| + | about it. That is, by being focussed on Moksham and doing worldly duties, we |
| + | also get material needs fullfilled as a "byproduct". |
| + | Then what happens to our domestic compulsions and duties? So one may doubt |
| + | whether this sermon is practical. Actually, by practicing Karma Yoga as preached |
| + | by Sri Krishna one will |
| + | get all the comforts in this world as a bye-product. But karmas done with aim |
| + | for earthly/ heavenly comforts will never get Moksham. Sri Krishna clearly says |
| + | that all karmas with Moksham |
| + | as objective, will by the Grace of Sri Krishna, satisfy all the necessities in |
| + | this earth, besides guaranteeing Moksham. One need not aspire for these worldly |
| + | desires and Sri Krishna will take |
| + | care of all those. It is like one pounds paddy to get rice. In the process, one |
| + | sweats profusely. Seeing this the neighbor asks whether one was pounding to sweat. |
| + | Sweating was only a |
| + | bye-product and aim was not for sweating. Similarly, we should perform our |
| + | karmas with Moksham as the only objective and nothing else. Paramatma will on His |
| + | own take care of our |
| + | comforts in this earth also. This declaration is necessary for anyone to aspire |
| + | to do karma yoga. |
| + | Another example is, when a wealthy man is ready to give one Lakh rupees, if we |
| + | ask him 100 rupees, we only get 100Rs and waste the opportunity to get 1 Lakh. |
| + | This is similar |
| + | to asking the Lord for only material things and not Moksham. If we focus and |
| + | ask for Moksham, we would also get "material" things as part of it. (just like |
| + | 100 is part of 1 Lakh!). |
| + | Another example is, in exam, if we target to get 80 marks, we may get 60, but if |
| + | we focus to get Cent percent, we have better chance of getting cent percent. It's |
| + | the same for Moksham, |
| + | which is the highest goal. |
| + | God is ready to give us the Ultimate- Moksham. The trivial benefits will |
| + | automatically follow suit. So Sri Krishna declares: |
| + | yam imam puspitam vacam pravadanty avipascitah veda-vada-ratah partha nanyad |
| + | astiti vadinah |
| + | "Men of small knowledge are very much attached to the flowery words of the Vedas, |
| + | which recommend various trivial activities for elevation to heavenly planets, |
| + | resultant good birth, power, and so forth� |
| + | Through all these slokas, Sri Krishna is instructing that all actions should be |
| + | performed with Moksham as the only purpose. Our aim should not be for the lower |
| + | benefits of comforts in this |
| + | world are other heavenly pleasures. Why does Sri Krishna say so? Firstly these |
| + | earthly/heavenly delights are trivial. They are transient in nature. The wealth |
| + | accumulated is not permanent. |
| + | What was comfortable yesterday may be irritating today. Thirdly, we are His |
| + | servants and so we should accept only what He ordains. Our service also should |
| + | only be for His pleasure. |
| + | By aspiring for lowly results, our attribute as His dependent is maligned. |
| + | Jeevatma is the servant or slave of Paramatma. Jeevatma is dependent on Paramatma. |
| + | So, it is necessary to |
| + | listen to What Sri Krishna orders and do the same. Every action of us should |
| + | please the Lord. By independently choosing a goal and doing karma to attain that, |
| + | will displease Him. |
| + | Thus these pleasures are trivial and momentary, and realizing we are in His |
| + | possession, we should never do any karma with results anything other than Moksham. |
| + | Though, this may |
| + | be accepted, it is not easy to drag away our actions from performing for petty |
| + | results. Even Alwars lament that the mind is pulled towards smaller pleasures. So |
| + | one cannot avoid this |
| + | struggle and only continuous efforts will make us to realize this. Never at |
| + | anytime think that this is impossible. As long we keep faith in Him, our efforts |
| + | in karmas for lowly benefits |
| + | will fade and we will perform all our actions only for Moksham. An action could be |
| + | done for smaller results or for lofty purpose and the attained results will be as |
| + | intended. |
| + | This material fruits are petty. The fruits of this desires are temporary (love |
| + | changes, property doesn't remain forever etc). Moreover, we are the Lord's |
| + | property (Jeevatma is subservient |
| + | to Paramatma by nature), so we should follow the path laid by the Lord, for our |
| + | benefit, rather than chasing petty and temporary things. |
| + | Ofcourse, it is not at all easy by any means to shed this material desires. |
| + | Even great Azhwars have written about the pull of the samsaric desires for Kama, |
| + | artha etc. This is a struggle |
| + | which we have to go through, with full faith in the Lord and not give up |
| + | easily. |
| + | Krishna says, a karma can be done with the intention of Moksham rather than |
| + | petty desires. We can do our daily duties with |
| + | this spirit. eg. Nuclear energy. Nuclear science can be used for good like |
| + | energy production but it can also be used for destruction. |
| + | Thus there are two sides of the coin. Therefore, the intention makes all the |
| + | difference. Similarly our karmas or actions could be intended for lowly benefits |
| + | and the same will be reaped. |
| + | But with an intention to achieve Moksham, the same karmas will yield not only |
| + | Moksham but the worldly happiness also. |
| + | If we perform actions with lowly intentions, then we will obtain only them and |
| + | we cannot avoid the recurring cycle of rebirths. Therefore, with a determination |
| + | to set goal as Moksham only, |
| + | Arjuna is advised to perform his duty. Apart from doing this way just because |
| + | Sri Krishna has told, Arjuna should have realized the temporary nature of the |
| + | worldly desires. We are able to |
| + | distinguish, in our daily life, what is good for us and what is bad. The |
| + | confusion emerges because we think atman and body are same. Since body gets |
| + | destroyed, our aim should be to do |
| + | good for the atman. Atman, like Paramatma, is in eternal bliss, but being a |
| + | captive in the body, is unable to attain its natural everlasting happiness. |
| + | Therefore, if this thought is always in |
| + | our mind, we can understand Karma Yoga properly. The true basic nature of |
| + | atman is necessary. |
| + | Ofcourse, the spirit of doing a karma in this sense requires the basic |
| + | understanding of sankya yoga which Krishna explained earlier |
| + | in this chapter i.e body and soul are not the same, soul is eternal and is |
| + | subservient to the Lord i,e ATMA SWAROOPAM. |
| + | Those who believe "svargam" is the greatest thing and pursue it in their karmas |
| + | , they do not get "vyavaSaytmika buddhi" (i.e fixed in the mind) i.,e controlled |
| + | mind and understanding |
| + | the true nature of soul and it's subservience to the Lord. |
| + | Who does Krishna call as Avi-pascitaha!(i.e one who have poor fund of |
| + | knowledge)? - These are people who know the Vedas, BUT |
| + | do not understand the true import of it!!. In vedas, there are lot of karma |
| + | kandas which tell the things to do to gain heaven, gain |
| + | children and other material benefits. These folks are "veda-vAda-ratAh" i.e |
| + | supposed followers of vedas. They argue (vAdinah) that |
| + | there is nothing else (na- Asti) in vedas, other than the fruitive activies |
| + | (karmas, sacrifices etc) that vedas recommend. |
| + | "puspitAm vAcam" - Why does krishna refer to flowery words? these words are |
| + | like flowers which fall away, but do not give any "fruits" |
| + | i.e the words of unintelligent people who say the purpose of vedas is to do |
| + | karmas for gaining heaven and other material things, their |
| + | words are merely flowery, but have no real fruits and do not reflect the true |
| + | import of vedas. |
| + | What is true import of vedas? There are two portions of vedas - Poorva bhagam |
| + | i.e Karma Kandam which explain all the yagnams, |
| + | karmas etc which provide guidance on the karmas (yagna, poojas ) which needs |
| + | to be done and includes Rig, Yagur,Sama,Atharva Vedas. The other portion(uttara |
| + | bhaagam) |
| + | is the jnana kanda which are upanishads etc which tell us to reach Brahman . |
| + | This is also called vedAnta (i.e way to reach brahman). KenoUpanishad, Taittriya |
| + | Upanishad etc , |
| + | which refers to brahmam and ways to reach Brahman. The unintelligent focus |
| + | only on the karma kandam, but forget the true import of vedas which is to reach |
| + | brahman. |
| + | If we do activities for material things i,e sense gratification (kAm- |
| + | Atmanah!), opulent life (svarga-parA) ; Krishna refers to "svarga-Para", |
| + | because when we are in material zone, "svargam" is considered the ultimate for |
| + | this people (and not moksham). These people |
| + | consider Swargam as the ultimate Parayanam(goal). When we do this activties, |
| + | it only ends us in taking repeated cycles of birth |
| + | and death i.e "janma-karma-phala-pradAm" i.e we may get heaven or hell , but |
| + | that only results in temporary enjoyment or pain and |
| + | the cycle keeps getting repeated. These are not "nityam" (not eternal). |
| + | Even if one achieves highest heavens, it is only a matter of |
| + | time, before one gets pushed back to the earth after the time is up. In the |
| + | 43rd sloka He says that people do various karma for lowly objectives. |
| + | The mind would have been set on various ordinary desires. The term atman here |
| + | means mind. Kama means desires. So, kamatmana means our frequently changing |
| + | desires. |
| + | If there was only one want, it could be fulfilled. But the desires are ever |
| + | increasing and continuing. In this list of desires the final is swarga or heaven. |
| + | That is these persons |
| + | [so called Vedic scholars] claim swarga as the ultimate and final in happiness. |
| + | By repeatedly doing these types of karma, they will only yield rebirth as the |
| + | consequential benefits. |
| + | Sri Krishna indicates the cycle of rebirths after attaining heaven. If one |
| + | wants to get away from these cycles, then one has to do karma yoga without any |
| + | desire excepting Moksham. |
| + | Here we will explain this cycle to some extent. We are in this world now. We do |
| + | various karmas and earn papa [sin] and punya [virtues]. Papa leads us to hell or |
| + | naraka and punya |
| + | takes us to swarga. In both naraka and swarga our atman will get new bodies and |
| + | we will undergo sufferings and pleasures respectively. After the punya is |
| + | exhausted, we will be pushed |
| + | out of the heaven. This is an authoritative statement [in the Vedas]. The |
| + | person enjoying pleasures in heaven does not enjoy fully as the fear of being |
| + | pushed away [after the punya is over] |
| + | will be lingering in his mind. It is like in a case where a person usually gets |
| + | only ordinary buttermilk and rice for meals. One day he is told that he would get |
| + | sarkarai pongal [a delicious |
| + | sugar candy and rice preparation] for next ten days. When he is enjoying that |
| + | delicacy, he will always be remembering that this enjoyment is not permanent and |
| + | after the ten-day period |
| + | is over, he would get the ordinary buttermilk and rice only. This thought will |
| + | not allow him to enjoy the eating of delicacy fully. He may feel it was better to |
| + | continue with the ordinary food itself |
| + | and there was no need for this temporary spell of pleasure. This fear of being |
| + | pushed out is not there in Moksham, and this is what Sri Krishna tells Arjuna. |
| + | This is what Nammalwar in |
| + | Thiruvaimozhi says. Instead of enjoying in heaven in constant fear of being |
| + | pushed away one day, it is far better to avoid heaven. At least, if there was |
| + | nothing superior to heaven also one |
| + | could aspire for that happiness. Sri Krishna says that He would show Arjuna |
| + | better place for pleasure and so why set the mind in such cheap targets. |
| + | Janma-karma-phala-pradAm - A question comes up here? Do we take Birth due to |
| + | our Karmas ? or do we do karmas due to birth? |
| + | This is like asking whether the seed or the tree came first! So, the answer |
| + | is, it's a cycle with no beginning or end. Now, another |
| + | questions may come up, what was the first karma of Atma? was it paapam or |
| + | punyam?? Answer is, atma is nityam i.e it is birthless |
| + | and Anaadi. Krishna refers here to this "karma phalam" which |
| + | results(pradAm) in births(janma). We should remember that there is nothing like |
| + | first birth, as atman is eternal and there |
| + | was not a time when it was non-existent. So the births also are in multitudes |
| + | and the swarga pala karma recommended by some Vedic pundits will result in the |
| + | continuation of this cycle of |
| + | births and karmas. Only a resolve to cling to the feet of the Lord will |
| + | divert our fickle mind from such attractions. Swami Vedantha Desika in his |
| + | Hayagreeva Sthothram says that when his |
| + | head is covered by the pollen of the Lord s Lotus feet, why � should he fall at |
| + | any mortal�s feet for favors and remedies? A steadfast surrender unto Him will |
| + | take care of all requirements in |
| + | this world for a comfortable life, besides yielding Moksham and cutting off |
| + | this cycle of rebirths. |
| + | Jeevatma is given "ahuthi" (i.e oblations) at five areas - Shraddhai, |
| + | Somam, vrushti, Annam and Repas for it to take birth in human |
| + | life. I.e when a Jeevatma's time is up in heavens , it gets pushed back from |
| + | Akasaham to Megam(clouds) and through rains it gets |
| + | pushed back to earth and through the grains(food), it finds itself in a man |
| + | and through his sperm, it deposits itself in the egg of woman |
| + | and takes birth as human. This is cycle which goes on foreover! his cycle of |
| + | births resemble yagna or homam. Just as ghee or havis is offered n the sacred fire |
| + | in a yagna, this |
| + | atman also is offered at many places. The birth of a child is described as |
| + | Panchagni Vidya Prakaranam in Upanishads. An atman after his tenure in swarga is |
| + | over is thrown out of swarga |
| + | and the atman dwells in the clouds. One day, in the decision of God, the |
| + | clouds make rain. The atman mingling in the rainy water reaches earth and feeds a |
| + | crop, say rice. The atman gets |
| + | into a grain of rice and after harvest, the rice is cooked in a house for |
| + | meal. This food is eaten by someone and later, enters the womb of a woman and |
| + | takes birth as a child, who could be |
| + | male or female. Thus the atman resided in space, cloud, rainwater, grains and |
| + | womb and then takes the body of a child and is born. The born child grows, |
| + | performs karmas and earns papa |
| + | and punya and accordingly reaches hell or heaven and after the papa/punya is |
| + | expended, again pushed out to start the next cycle. We have to therefore learn |
| + | that we will have to do our |
| + | karma without attachment to these smaller benefits, which will take us only to |
| + | heaven, only to be born again after sometime. We will have to breakaway from this |
| + | cycle. |
| + | kriyA-visEsa-bahulAm - They do pompous ceremonies, endless karmas, activities |
| + | in pursuit of material gains. All of this just to |
| + | for sense enjoyment and progress towards material gains. |
| + | bhOg-Aiswarya-prasaktAnam - People who are attached to Bhogam, Aiswaryam and |
| + | in a material plane; And NOT rooted in the |
| + | understanding that Body and Soul are different, Body is temporary, the |
| + | Soul's nature is servitude to the lord, it's goal is to get out |
| + | of this life-death cycle - these people are condemned forever. |
| + | TiruppanAzhwar in this AMalandipaaran pasuram "Mandipaay..." |
| + | mentions about monkeys who jumps from tree to tree eating fruits half here, |
| + | half there and compares us to these monkeys. When |
| + | we go to Tiruvenkgadam, we go with similar desires which keeps increasing and |
| + | changing everytime we go there and the Lord is |
| + | kind enough to do it, but we are never satisfied. Like Agni 's |
| + | characterisitic "Analaaha", there is no end to our desire, we keep |
| + | swallowing and ask more and more. |
| + | The ignorant, whose knowledge is little, and who have as their sole aim the |
| + | attainment of enjoyment and power, speak the flowery language i.e., having its |
| + | flowers (show) only as fruits, which look apparently beautiful at first sight. |
| + | They rejoice in the letter of the Vedas i.e., they are attached to heaven and such |
| + | other results (promised in the Karma-kanda of the Vedas). They say that there is |
| + | nothing else, owing to their intense attachment to these results. They say that |
| + | there is no fruit superior to heaven etc. They are full of worldly desires and |
| + | their minds are highly attached to secular desires. They hanker for heaven, i.e. |
| + | think of the enjoyment of the felicities of heaven, after which one can again have |
| + | rebirth which offers again the opportunity to perform varied rites devoid of true |
| + | knowledge and leads towards the attainment of enjoyments and power once again. |
| + | With regard to those who cling to pleasure and power and whose understanding is |
| + | contaminated by that flowery speech relating to pleasure and lordly powers, the |
| + | aforesaid mental disposition characterised by resolution, will not arise in their |
| + | Samadhi. Samadhi here means the mind. The knowledge of the self will not arise in |
| + | such minds. In the minds of these persons, there cannot arise the mental |
| + | disposition that looks on all Vedic rituals as means for liberation based on the |
| + | determined conviction about the real form of the self. Hence, in an aspirant for |
| + | liberation, there should be no attachment to rituals out of the conviction that |
| + | they are meant for the acquisition of objects of desire only. It may be questioned |
| + | why the Vedas, which have more of love for Jivas than thousands of parents, and |
| + | which are endeavouring to save the Jivas, should prescribe in this way rites whose |
| + | fruits are infinitesimal and which produce only new births. It can also be asked |
| + | if it is proper to abandon what is given in the Vedas. Sri Krsna replies to these |
| + | questions. |
| + | O! Partha, the unwise, who rejoice in the letter of the Vedas, say, 'There is |
| + | nothing else.' They are full only of wordly desires and they hanker for heaven. |
| + | They speak flowery words which offer rebirth as the fruit of work. They look upon |
| + | the Vedas as consisting entirely of varied rites for the attainment of pleasure |
| + | and power. Those who cling so to pleasure and power are attracted by that speech |
| + | (offering heavenly rewards) and are unable to develop the resolute will of a |
| + | concentrated mind. |
| + | In the 42nd sloka, He mentioned that some Vedic Pundits claim in flowery language |
| + | that swarga is the ultimate goal for the atman. In the 43rd sloka He explains how |
| + | all these karmas will lead one to earthly wealth only. In the 44th sloka, He says |
| + | that such people, who pursue karmas for worldly wealth, will never realize the |
| + | real nature of atman. If one understands atman is different from body, one will |
| + | not give that importance to the body. But these worldly wealth are all related to |
| + | body only. Therefore, these karmas will enable only recurring births and remain in |
| + | the birth cycle. So, atman chinthana or contemplating on atman is necessary to |
| + | break away from this cycle. This step will lead to reaching Brahman or God. These |
| + | people are not going to get the wisdom, if they are absorbed in karmas leading to |
| + | swarga. Which wisdom? The wisdom or gyana that atman and body are different, that |
| + | the atman is eternal and indestructible, that the atman nature is everlasting |
| + | happiness and that the atman is servant of the Lord. Thiruppanalwar describes in |
| + | his Amalanadhipiran in the 3rd hymn, mandhi pai vada venkata.. We see a tree here. |
| + | Lots of birds perch and eat the fruits. After the fruits are exhausted, they |
| + | migrate to another tree. When we go to Thirumala we notice monkeys. They jump from |
| + | one tree to another. The monkeys mentioned by Alwar in the hymn are people like |
| + | us, our Acharyas emphatically mention. Because we possess same qualities. Just as |
| + | monkeys jump off from one tree after exhausting the fruits, we also seek various |
| + | boons from the Lord Venkatesa. The Lord also thinking that next time that person |
| + | might pray for Moksham, grants the smaller desires. But that person comes with |
| + | more earthly desires next time. A villager visited a city. His friends cautioned |
| + | him that in the city you should purchase anything only after bargaining. They told |
| + | that he should bargain for 50% of the seller s price. He came � to the city and |
| + | wanted to purchase an article and the seller demanded Rs.100. villager remembered |
| + | the advice of his friends and bargained for Rs.50. The seller felt it was too low |
| + | and said he would agree for Rs.70. Immediately, the villager asked for Rs.35. |
| + | Puzzled the seller said he may as well give it free. Quick came the bargain from |
| + | the villager; whether he would give two such articles! In a similar way we never |
| + | get satisfied with what we have and our demands are ever growing. Like the monkeys |
| + | hopping tree after tree. The fire in yagna is called anala. It will consume |
| + | anything without a limit. Our mind also is in a way like that, never satisfied |
| + | with what was given. We never say enough for the accumulation of wealth. We should |
| + | earn to give the needy and poor. But we accumulate for our children without a |
| + | limit. Our mind is trained to calculate how much more we should earn and how to |
| + | amass wealth. We surely know what is enough for us, but we are greedy and want to |
| + | amass more and more. If only we could devote our attention to the welfare of atman |
| + | instead of body, we would have achieved great results. We are comforting the body |
| + | in shade while allowing the atman to suffer in the hot sun. That is we are keeping |
| + | the body in wealth and comforts. It should be the other way. But we never do that |
| + | and our mind is engaged in these worldly wealth and happiness all the time losing |
| + | even our sleep. Sri Krishna therefore tells Arjuna that by thinking of these |
| + | earthly pleasures and planning how to attain, such minds have no scope for |
| + | thinking what is good for the soul. Naturally, they can never do karma yoga and |
| + | consequently, Moksham is denied to them. That means they will be in the birthdeath |
| + | cycle and earn papa and punya. To expend these more and more births will be |
| + | needed. So only by doing one�s duty with detachment and determination, one can |
| + | come away from the cycle of births. This is the substance of 44th sloka. |
| + | <nowiki>*****</nowiki> |
| + | Extract from Gita Bhashyam Commentary for verses 42, 43, 44 : |
| + | The word puspitam meaning flowery or that whose fruit is no more than the flower |
| + | itself and therefore although flowery language may be pleasant to hear it is |
| + | merely a superficial pleasure in the same way it is pleasant to gaze upon a flower |
| + | but what is actually gained from it is negligible. Thus those of little |
| + | understanding lacking spiritual intelligence discourse on that which concerns the |
| + | acquisition of power and wealth. |
| + | The words veda-vada-ratah defines those who are addicted to the specific sections |
| + | of the Vedic scriptures which prescribe activities to receive rewards like |
| + | celestial worlds with heavenly delights. |
| + | The words anyad astiti vadinah defines those who contend that no higher goal |
| + | exists beyond the heavenly planets. |
| + | The word kamatmanah defines those whose minds are always seeking enjoyment |
| + | engrossed in material sense gratification. |
| + | The words svarga-parah defines those whose attention is always focused on |
| + | attaining enjoyments in the heavenly worlds. |
| + | The words janma-karma-phala-pradam defines that which relates to activities which |
| + | would result in being born again into the material existence due to having to |
| + | accept the rewards of one's past actions. |
| + | The word kriya-visesha-bahulam defines those discussions regarding the manifold |
| + | rites and rituals required to be performed successfully in order to aquire |
| + | opulence and power. |
| + | To those then who are addicted to wealth and power. To those whose light of |
| + | understanding is dimmed. To those who are captivated by the thought of obtaining |
| + | opulence and power and are raptly interested in the discussion of all subjects |
| + | related to acquiring opulence and power; then no determined resolve as that which |
| + | is mentioned in verse 41 will be able to manifest in their minds. |
| + | The word samadhi is a permanent meditative state of mind and when achieved it can |
| + | be likened to the mind for the mind is where spiritual knowledge is collected, |
| + | contemplated and comprehended and where consciousness of a superior nature is |
| + | attained. This is indicated by the word samadhiyate a derivative of the root word |
| + | samadhi. The understanding is that at no time ever does spiritual knowledge come |
| + | to those whose minds are engrossed in mere desire for wealth and power. The |
| + | conviction one has to obtain temporal material objects is not of the same quality |
| + | as the conviction one has who is determined to free themselves from the material |
| + | existence forever. All activities for them either practical or esoteric are but |
| + | the means to accomplish this goal and attain salvation and hence those who have |
| + | qualified in this way are very careful not to connect themselves with any kamakarmas |
| + | or actions which bring rise to carnal desires so as not to cause any |
| + | impediments in their spiritual progress. |
| + | Hence, in an aspirant for liberation, there should be no attachment to rituals out |
| + | of the conviction that they are meant for the acquisition of objects of desire |
| + | only. It may be questioned why the Vedas, which have more of love for Jivas than |
| + | thousands of parents, and which are endeavouring to save the Jivas, should |
| + | prescribe in this way rites whose fruits are infinitesimal and which produce only |
| + | new births. It can also be asked if it is proper to abandon what is given in the |
| + | Vedas. Sri Krsna replies to these questions in next verses. |