Sukha and Ananda (सुखानन्दश्च)

This article needs editing. Add and improvise the content from reliable sources.

Ananda (Samskrit: आनन्दः) is a term of great significance in Indian philosophical traditions and in other cultures. Across time and cultures, human beings attached great value to Ananda, and have been trying to find it. In this process, philosophies have been developed, books have been written and teachings have been given. The ideas of happiness are closely linked with the larger framework of reality and human nature which one carries in their mind. Conceptualization of the nature of happiness and well-being primarily depend on the worldview one holds that lead to differing assumptions on the nature of reality and of human nature. It has varied across cultures on a spectrum ranging from hedonic to transcendent viewpoints. Happiness is not only an emotion but refers to living a good life, experiencing well-being and enjoying a good quality of life.

परिचयः ॥ Introduction

The mystery of happiness has preoccupied philosophers, psychologists and the whole human race. Fundamentally, everyone is compelled to identify happiness, worldly or transcendent in nature, as a 'virtue' because it is something everyone wants in a positive way. The pursuit of happiness has been the axiomatic reference of all human endeavors across cultures and timelines. The need to seek 'happiness' and be 'happy' through all one's actions is universally acknowledged as the main motivating force in the lives of people.

Currently, the study of well-being (Svasthya) and happiness (ananda, sukha) has acquired central focus in the discipline of psychology and more so in positive psychology as a subject.

At present, there are two dominant approaches to human happiness and well‐being:

• Hedonic perspectives
• Eudaimonic perspectives

The hedonic perspective with its roots in Hedonism – an ancient school of thought which argues that pleasure is the only intrinsic good, seeks to maximize one’s happiness by maximizing one’s pleasure and avoiding displeasures. Subjective Well-being (SWB) has been associated with the hedonistic approach. Wellbeing in itself refers to the optimal psychological experience and functioning of the individual. As it involves people evaluating themselves subjectively, the extent to which they experience a sense of wellness is termed as Subjective Well-being (SWB).

The eudaimonic perspective of happiness is defined as the highest good that one seeks and one ought to seek as the end in itself and not as a means to any other end. It results from a life based on virtuousness and contemplation. Psychological well-being (PWB) is the counterpart of SWB in the eudaimonic tradition.

In Indian traditions we quite often hear about the chants - सर्वे भवन्तु सुखिनः। let all be happy and लोकाः समस्ताः सुखिनो भवन्तु। lokāḥ samastāḥ sukhino bhavantu॥ let all the beings in all worlds be happy. Here the reference is to सुखम् in the sense of happiness. Within Indian society itself we have both material and spiritual worldviews espoused in ancient times leading to different perspectives, hedonic, collective and transcendental.

व्युत्पत्तिः ॥ Etymology

According to Shabdakalpadhruma आनन्दः (ānandaḥ) means आह्लादः which in general means a state of happiness, joy, delight, pleasure. In Taittriya Upanishad, आनन्दं ब्रह्मणो विद्वान्न बिभेति कदाचन, and in Shatapata Brahmana, (10.3.5.13) आनन्द एवास्य विज्ञानमात्माऽऽनन्दात्मानो हैवं सर्वे देवाःananda refers to supreme bliss of felicity. It is used in the sense of God, Supreme Spirit (ब्रह्मन्) (said to be n. also in this sense; cf. विज्ञानमानन्दं ब्रह्म Bṛi. Up.3.9.28.).

The synonyms used for आनन्दः (ānandaḥ) are given as आबन्दथुः (Abandathu), शर्म्म (Sharma), शातं (Shanta), सुखं (Sukha), सुत् (Sut), प्रीतिः (Priti), प्रमोदः (Pramoda), हर्षः (Harsha), प्रमदः (Pramada), आमोदः (Amoda), समदः (Samada) as per Amarakosha.

‘Happy’ as an adjective has three broad meanings: (1) fortunate, lucky; feeling or expressing pleasure, contentment, satisfaction, etc.; (2) (in polite formulas) pleased; (3) (of language, conduct, suggestion) well-suited to the situation. ‘Happiness' is used as a noun to convey the first meaning (Hornby et al. 1948, cited in Lu 2001). While, it is true that the feelings of being fortunate and happy are intimately connected and in some instances synonymous, the term does not cover the various shades of the actual experience itself, nor does it provide any significant insight into the psychological processes that accompany the state of happiness.

Similarly, in Indian languages also, there are many terms used for happiness, like bhoga, sukha, santoṣa, harṣa, ullāsa, ānanda, trpti, tuṣhti, śubha, mangala, kalyāṇa, śreyas, preyas, śānti, ārogya, swāsthya, sthitaprajñatā. Of all these, the word sukha is most commonly used to denote happiness as reflected in the invocations like "lokāḥ samastāḥ sukhino bhavantu."

सुखम् आनन्दं वा ॥ Sukha Vs Ananda

Happiness is one of the English terms for ananda, and it takes two shades based on materialistic or non-materialistic views. The nearest and approximate equivalent of the term, ananda, in English is bliss, when it is associated with spirituality. This is distinguished from sukha, the happiness of a mundane variety. The opposite of sukha is dukkha (sorrow and suffering). Although meaning in life is often centered in the extrinsic pursuit of sukha, a higher meaning of life needs to be focused intrinsically in ananda. Man instinctively has a natural attraction to sensory gratification, desires and attachment. He strives for pleasure. Pleasure is sense related. It is evanescent and ephemeral. Bliss is more stable and spiritual, because it is anchored in consciousness. One’s pleasure may lead to suffering of others but bliss spreads happiness all around.

According to Ayurveda, sukha (happiness) is a state without physical and psychical ailments, where a person has energy and strength to perform his duties, and knowledge to know what is right and wrong, is able to use his senses and enjoy from them, and is virtuous (Caraka Saṁhitā, 1.30.23). Useful life (hitāyu) is one where the person attends to well-being of others, controls his passions, shares his knowledge and wealth with others and is virtuous (Caraka Saṁhitā, 1.30.26).

On the other hand, AdvaitaVedānta conceives jiva (person) as a multi-layered entity composed of five nested sheaths, with ananda (blissfulness) at the core (ānandamaya). The Taittiriya Upanishad (2.8) estimates the Bliss of Brahman/Ātman to be 100 quintillion times higher than what a young, well-endowed human being can enjoy.

A cursory glance of the two terms that have been used to denote the concept of happiness, is as follows

1. Ānanda (आनन्दम्): This term is made of the prefix ‘Ā’ and the root ‘nand’ meaning rejoicing. Happiness, joy, enjoyment, sensual pleasure, pure happiness are the meanings of the term as provided by Monier Williams. It is the most commonly used word in Vedantic literature. Generally, it covers the entire range of happiness at various levels but mainly refers to the ultimate happiness or bliss. It is also one of the terms used to describe the essential nature of the Self along with Sat (Existence) and Cit (Consciousness).
2. Sukha (सुखम्): This is the other most common term for happiness in Vedantic literature and folk culture. It means pleasant, comfort, easiness, prosperity, pleasure, happiness etc. according to the Monier Williams dictionary.

In common language the terms sukha and Ānanda are used synonymously. However, it must be noted that sukha belongs to a set of concepts where dualities exist i.e. dukha (pain, sorrow, suffering etc.) stands in contrast to sukha, whereas Ānanda is beyond sukha as it transcends both sukha and dukha. As such there is no term that stands in anti-thesis to the experience of Ānanda.

Happiness is a mental or emotional state of well-being characterized by positive or pleasant emotions.

आनन्दस्त्रिविधः ॥ Three kinds of Ananda

Panchadasi, a Vedantic text by Swami Vidyaranya, describes three kinds of Ananda.

आनन्दस्त्रिविधो ब्रह्मानन्दो विद्यासुखं तथा । विषयानन्द इत्यादौ ब्रह्मानन्दो विविच्यते ॥ ११॥ (Panchadasi 11.11)

Meaning: Ananda is said to be of three kinds, viz., Brahmananda, Vidyasukha, and Vishayananda.

The text further explains the three as follows.

• ब्रह्मानन्दः ॥ Brahmananda - transcendental happiness which is regarded as the highest form of happiness or bliss that a person can experience. Atmananda (bliss of Atma/Self) is described to those desiring to know the truth about Brahman. All things including wife, sons and wealth are loved not for their sakes but for the sake of Self. Self is never loved for the sake of anything else. Love for the Self is not the same as desire, for it exists in the absence and presence of desires. More information about this can be obtained from Yajnavalkya Maitreyi Samvada. Similarly in the states of Samadhi, in Yogananda (bliss of Yoga), sleep etc., secondless Brahman is experienced.
• विद्यासुखम् ॥ Vidyasukha (Jnanananda) - happiness due to knowledge is a modification of intellectual operation. It is of four kinds characterized by (1) absence of sorrow, (2) fulfillment of desires, (3) satisfaction arising from accomplishment of all deeds that have to be done and (4) realization of all that need to be realized.
• विषयानन्दः ॥ Vishayananda - happiness derived from material objects is described in this section. It is preliminary to and a part of Brahmananda, however other creatures enjoy only a mere trace of it. Like the happiness due to knowledge, that due to material objects is also a modification of the intellectual operation. Material operations are of three kinds - calm (Satvic), active (Rajasic) and ignorant (Tamasic).

Considering the idea of happiness and sukha in Panchadasi, the Vedantic tradition, and examining the later texts on dramaturgy (Alankara Shastra) and aesthetics (Natya Shastra) such as Dhvanyaloka and Natyashastra by Bharatamuni, researchers in Indian Psychology came up with a broad classification of happiness into three categories to convey the quintessence of Indic insight on happiness. They are (in the order of gross to subtle):

• Vishayananda – Sensual/Material happiness
• Kavyananda – Aesthetic happiness
• Brahmananda – Existential/transcendental happiness

विषयानन्दः ॥ Vishayananda (Hedonistic happiness)

According to the authors, Vishaya refers to objects, and Vishayananda can be equated to hedonistic happiness, which is experienced by an individual coming in contact with objects of desire. Usually, it is the pleasure associated with either yearning, possessing, consuming, etc. of material objects. It is the grossest form of happiness. The Gita (5.22) notes that such pleasurable experience based on the sense-object contact is momentary or short lived, and may even leave the person with a sense of wanting and lack and consequently cause pain and suffering once the external stimulus fades.

ये हि संस्पर्शजा भोगा दुःखयोनय एव ते । आद्यन्तवन्तः कौन्तेय न तेषु रमते बुधः ॥ ५-२२॥ (Bhag. Gita. 5.22) ye hi saṃsparśajā bhogā duḥkhayonaya eva te ādyantavantaḥ kaunteya na teṣu ramate budhaḥ

Moreover, the intensity of happiness experienced is said to reduce with prolonged exposure to the source such as the Rājasika and tāmasika sukha. It must be noted that the Indic tradition does not negate the role and necessity of material happiness. However, it very clearly brings out the limitations of such happiness and persuades the individual to go beyond immediate gratification and seek a deeper and more lasting happiness.

काव्यानन्दः॥ Kavyananda (Eudaimonic happiness)

Kavya literally means the work/product of a "kavi" - visionary, a seer, a poet, an artist etc., which involves talent, a particular skill, and grace. Similar to eudaimonic happiness, this is experienced in a situation where the individual is called to respond to a challenge and in response every individual expresses certain potentialities within and actualizes them. In other words, this is the kind of happiness a person experiences in self-actualization. Here, the external situation calls upon the person to rise above his/her ordinary comfort zone and excel in the required task and in response the person's internal system rises to the occasion successfully. The situation or objects outside act as motivators or stimulants. Consequently, there is a sense of fulfilment, accomplishment, and enhanced self-worthiness that accompanies such an experience which could be self-directed as well as directed towards others. Such an experience is enduring in nature as it leaves the individual with a sense of contentment, builds self-confidence for a relatively longer period. This is also known as sātvika sukha.

The causes, determinants and correlates of the above two kinds of happiness match to a large extent with their western counterparts. However, in the Indian philosophy one more kind of happiness is also identified beyond these two kinds.

ब्रह्मानन्दः ॥ Brahmananda (Existential/Transcendental happiness)

Brahma (or Brahman), a supreme singular entity as per Indian thought, is regarded as essential reality of every individual (across the various sampradayas) as well as the substratum of the universe. Brahmananda, is regarded as the highest form of happiness or bliss that a person can experience. It is transcendental in the sense that it transcends the limitations of compartmentalized individual existence. It is also called ‘existential’ because it is the core aspect of human existence in as much that it cannot be separated from human identity. It is subjective in nature and not dependent on any external object, situation or person. The ancient texts assure us that every individual is capable of experiencing such a state of happiness through a conscious and systematic process of Self discovery as it is the very nature of one’s being and it is intrinsic to all of us. This kind of happiness results from Self-realization which is qualitatively different from self-actualization.

A Summary of Sukha and Ananda in Indian Traditions

The following table succinctly summarizes the various shades of sukha, and ananda and their relationship with the Panchakoshas.

We can see from the above table that transcendental happiness is not defined in Western conceptualization of happiness. Hence perspectives in this area forms the core contribution of Indian thought to the world.

सुखं त्रिविधम् ॥ Three kinds of Sukha

Shrimad Bhagavadgita (18.36) defines it as ‘something which the individual rejoices having attained with effort and which also marks the absence of unhappiness.

सुखं त्विदानीं त्रिविधं श‍ृणु मे भरतर्षभ । अभ्यासाद्रमते यत्र दुःखान्तं च निगच्छति ॥ १८-३६॥ (Bhag. Gita. 18.36) sukhaṃ tvidānīṃ trividhaṃ śṛṇu me bharatarṣabha abhyāsādramate yatra duḥkhāntaṃ ca nigacchati

यत्तदग्रे विषमिव परिणामेऽमृतोपमम् । तत्सुखं सात्त्विकं प्रोक्तमात्मबुद्धिप्रसादजम् ॥ १८-३७॥ (Bhag. Gita. 18.37) yattadagre viṣamiva pariṇāme’mṛtopamam

tatsukhaṃ sāttvikaṃ proktamātmabuddhiprasādajam

विषयेन्द्रियसंयोगाद्यत्तदग्रेऽमृतोपमम् । परिणामे विषमिव तत्सुखं राजसं स्मृतम् ॥ १८-३८॥ (Bhag. Gita. 18.38) viṣayendriyasaṃyogādyattadagre’mṛtopamam pariṇāme viṣamiva tatsukhaṃ rājasaṃ smṛtam

यदग्रे चानुबन्धे च सुखं मोहनमात्मनः । निद्रालस्यप्रमादोत्थं तत्तामसमुदाहृतम् ॥ १८-३९॥ (Bhag. Gita. 18.39) yadagre cānubandhe ca sukhaṃ mohanamātmanaḥm nidrālasyapramādotthaṃ tattāmasamudāhṛtam

In this text sukha is classified into three kinds

• सात्विकम्॥Sātvika (noble): Sātvika sukha consists of such happiness which appears to be effortful (while pursuing it) but eventually tastes like nectar, i.e. very pleasant. Such happiness arises as a result of intelligent and creative efforts with a right knowledge of oneself. (Bhag. Gita. 18.37)
• राजसिकम्॥Rājasika (dynamic): Rājasika sukha is the resultant of the contact of the sense organs and the objects which appears to be pleasurable initially but unpleasant at the end, i.e. after the experience as it leaves a person with a sense of wanting. (Bhag. Gita. 18.38)
• तामसिकम्॥Tāmasika (lethargic): Tāmasika sukha, is the happiness that is delusionary in nature from beginning to the end that may arise from sleep, laziness, ignorance, illusion etc. (Bhag. Gita. 18.39)

Several features of Happiness

Though the concepts of happiness in different countries of the world differ from each other, perhaps the quest for happiness is ubiquitous and hence universal. Happiness can be classified based on several features.

1. Source of happiness - Is it self driven or driven by others? The source of happiness is often conceived as coming from or due to the actions or support of other people.
2. Duration of happiness - Is short-term happiness such as watching a good movie more fulfilling than long term happiness that arises due to say a spiritual reason?
3. Location of happiness - Is happiness restricted to the physical body or is happiness a mental state?
4. Factors of happiness - Is happiness due to external materialistic and environmental factors (marital status, education, income) or is it due to internal factors (contentment, compassion, personality, contemplation)
5. Intensity of Happiness - Happiness has a peak moment (is momentary) and a non-peak state (a memory)

In certain countries enjoyment of desirable goods, entertainment and pleasure in life, in other words physical satisfaction or hedonic approach dominates. In countries like India, it is associated with spirituality and being in the protection of divine, superhuman elements such as Ishvara.

Impact of Environment on Happiness

Like well-being (Svasthya), happiness is also closely linked to environmental changes along with genetic factors. Research undertaken in recent years has shown a shift in happiness from being related to pure psychology to environmental psychology, community environment and spatial governance. According to the authors of this study, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is commonly used in the international community as an important indicator to measure social progress and people’s well-being. Capitalists believed that economic growth would bring us happiness, but a small, poor Buddhist country—Bhutan—has dispelled the myth with the concept of Gross National Happiness. Today, the concept of happiness has evolved from the field of psychology to all disciplines. Many researchers are exploring how environmental psychology/behavioral psychology influences residents' sense of happiness. Their results showed that factors like green area, community layout, aesthetics, transportation service and social service significantly influenced residents' sense of happiness.

Impact of Personality on Happiness

Studies of personality and environmental correlates of happiness indicate that both these factors have a significant impact as happiness indicators.

Importance of happiness

Why does happiness matter?

Offers us meaning and purpose of life. It helps discover new passions, generate curiosity, builds strong coping skill and emotional resources. Tolerate risks and and anxiety, keeps us healthy mentally and physically.

Why is it important to study happiness scientifically?

To develop more insight, awareness and orientation about ourselves.

to get rid of misconceptions about happiness. ridding about misconceptions of life, career, notions of people, stereotypes of people helps us develop resilience.

supports turbulent life experiences and manage failure

to create happiness for others and thus create our happy surroundings

Means of happiness

What are means of happiness?

Social sciences in general, but Neurosciences, Behavioural sciences, and Computational science take advantage of the theory of happiness. Fundamental We share the findings of methodologies of different disciplines.

What makes us happy?

Affluence in bio-psycho-social resource that determine the quality of living and prosperity

Autonomy in freedom to choose or in meaningful physical and mental engagements

Appreciation for life as a whole that determines life satisfaction (subjective wellbeing)

Components and Indian Philosophies of happiness

Life over career, context (life experience) over content, attitude (creates a mindset to meet someone, face fears, for overcoming troubles and progressing) over aptitude and choice (helps experience the myriad shades of emotions not just happiness) over compulsion.

Most of the research done so far in the field of Psychology has focused on what the reasons are for a person to be happy or the external factors contributing to happiness. Large surveys have come up with the components of happiness factor such as:

1. satisfaction with life
2. balanced and rational view
3. quality of life
4. optimism
5. well-being
6. self esteem

The objectives of Indian texts such as Upanishads, on the other hand, give a suggestion and a way to the seeker to look within. They encourage reaching the state of Ananda through spiritual practices or mental exercises which are within the control of the individual rather than the external forces which are not under his or her control.

Happiness and Psychology

Science or Practice - Both

Genotype or Phenotype - Gene for happiness

Process or outcome - outcome is a target, targets change, process is memory based happiness, outcome is moment based happiness

Thinking or Blinking -

Mind or mindset - primal belief whether world is hostile

Conclusions

Insight (foe self) and awareness (about iothers)

Sustain positve feeling and adapt to stressful experience

Betweenness with interpersonal skill and within-ness

Misconceptions about happiness

Money increases happiness - happiness does not increase after a salary of 75K $ and begins to plateau after a decent salary

Receive a gift - purchasing a gift increases happiness not receiving, biologists and neurologists found a neural link, create happiness for others.