Difference between revisions of "Sampradayasiddha Vishaya (संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः)"

From Dharmawiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Sampradaya Siddha vishaya, now this is the especiality of our dharmic tradition, parampara system, we see that in the Wikipedia other than the traditional scholars those who d...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Sampradaya Siddha vishaya, now this is the especiality of our dharmic tradition, parampara system, we see that in the Wikipedia other than the traditional scholars those who do not come from parampara system they are quoted as the reference point.  They are quoted as the authorities.
+
Sampradaya Siddha vishaya (Samskrit : संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः) refers to the unique dharmika tradition, the Bharatiya parampara that has been in handed down to families and lineages in Bharatavarsha. Many references in the volumes of works available in internet, accessed by many people over the world (such as Wikipedia, Institutional websites, Forums, Blogs) have been built using Books and References coming from non-traditional scholars. Such scholars (many western and bharatiya) coming from non-traditional backgrounds have all greatly contributed to the interpretations of Vedas and Vaidika Literature. Many such works, in public and media circulation, which are being questioned for their interpretations of Vaidika concepts, are being quoted as the reference points and authorities of the subject.
  
Narayan acharya: This is mischievous motivated and sacrad, well obvious that the man who does not have the proper experience cannot understand the basic concepts of sanatan Dharma and therefore he must have ulterior motive in denying these things we cannot answer him from the sanatana point of you because he doesn't want to understand them, he doesn't want to understand them what you have to do is dismantle his view and questions a very idea of the attacking Hinduism, attacking basic Hindu tradition and therefore a good number of basic great Hindu scholars ignore them. I was told in one of the books of, who is that writer of Sanskrit, Rajiv Malhotra says that in sringeri he met a scholar and told him the mischief that is going on and this scholar simply said oh this goes on and therefore let us not take it seriously. Malhotra got very serious and said if you're gone ignoring these people, they will multiply.  my answer is, this is not happening for the first time, this is happened over thousands of years. All through there is devas and asuras on battles, in the Vedas themselves it is recorded that a group of people called "panis" hide the Vedas them self in some caves and the great sage Angirasa set them out.  
+
Sanatana Dharma, advocates unique concepts that have been the guiding force for the Manas (mindset) and Karma (activities) for many generations of Bharatiyas. One who does not have the proper experience due to lack of upbringing (with these concepts) in such social environment cannot grasp the basic concepts of the sampradayas in Sanatana Dharma. Digressing from the benefits of dharmika concepts has been happening over thousands of years. All through there is devas and asuras on battles, in the Vedas themselves it is recorded that a group of people called [[Panis (पणिकाः)|Panis]] hid the Vedas in caves and the great sage [[Angirasa (अङ्गिरसः)|Angirasa]] set them out.  
  
 
Just like a student who picks up a very important books in a library and hides it in a place so that it may not be available to other deserving students. The greater trade of Discovery is to bring that into the focus and therefore sampraday Siddha vishaya means something that is established through experience sampradaya does not mean spurious tradition, you can't have spurious tradition now and then. People like Max Mueller Wilson, these are not our sampradhaya people are our sampradhaya people are vashishtha, vamadeva, vishwamitra, jamadagni, go back to the rishis, yesterday somebody ask me a question I said as long as a myth is created by a risi it must have our lost in me. spurious myths created by these so called janpada(folk) people stories invented to decry Krishna stories invented to decry there was no mahabharata, stories invented to say that there was no such thing as Mahabharata war we don't accept that, no Hindu will accept and I am sure that this sampradhaya will endure as long as the sun and the moon are there in the sky.  
 
Just like a student who picks up a very important books in a library and hides it in a place so that it may not be available to other deserving students. The greater trade of Discovery is to bring that into the focus and therefore sampraday Siddha vishaya means something that is established through experience sampradaya does not mean spurious tradition, you can't have spurious tradition now and then. People like Max Mueller Wilson, these are not our sampradhaya people are our sampradhaya people are vashishtha, vamadeva, vishwamitra, jamadagni, go back to the rishis, yesterday somebody ask me a question I said as long as a myth is created by a risi it must have our lost in me. spurious myths created by these so called janpada(folk) people stories invented to decry Krishna stories invented to decry there was no mahabharata, stories invented to say that there was no such thing as Mahabharata war we don't accept that, no Hindu will accept and I am sure that this sampradhaya will endure as long as the sun and the moon are there in the sky.  
 
[[Category:About Dharmawiki]]
 
[[Category:About Dharmawiki]]
 
[[Category:DPOV]]
 
[[Category:DPOV]]

Revision as of 13:22, 3 January 2019

Sampradaya Siddha vishaya (Samskrit : संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः) refers to the unique dharmika tradition, the Bharatiya parampara that has been in handed down to families and lineages in Bharatavarsha. Many references in the volumes of works available in internet, accessed by many people over the world (such as Wikipedia, Institutional websites, Forums, Blogs) have been built using Books and References coming from non-traditional scholars. Such scholars (many western and bharatiya) coming from non-traditional backgrounds have all greatly contributed to the interpretations of Vedas and Vaidika Literature. Many such works, in public and media circulation, which are being questioned for their interpretations of Vaidika concepts, are being quoted as the reference points and authorities of the subject.

Sanatana Dharma, advocates unique concepts that have been the guiding force for the Manas (mindset) and Karma (activities) for many generations of Bharatiyas. One who does not have the proper experience due to lack of upbringing (with these concepts) in such social environment cannot grasp the basic concepts of the sampradayas in Sanatana Dharma. Digressing from the benefits of dharmika concepts has been happening over thousands of years. All through there is devas and asuras on battles, in the Vedas themselves it is recorded that a group of people called Panis hid the Vedas in caves and the great sage Angirasa set them out.

Just like a student who picks up a very important books in a library and hides it in a place so that it may not be available to other deserving students. The greater trade of Discovery is to bring that into the focus and therefore sampraday Siddha vishaya means something that is established through experience sampradaya does not mean spurious tradition, you can't have spurious tradition now and then. People like Max Mueller Wilson, these are not our sampradhaya people are our sampradhaya people are vashishtha, vamadeva, vishwamitra, jamadagni, go back to the rishis, yesterday somebody ask me a question I said as long as a myth is created by a risi it must have our lost in me. spurious myths created by these so called janpada(folk) people stories invented to decry Krishna stories invented to decry there was no mahabharata, stories invented to say that there was no such thing as Mahabharata war we don't accept that, no Hindu will accept and I am sure that this sampradhaya will endure as long as the sun and the moon are there in the sky.