8,090
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − Relationship of Brahman and Atman, the premises about their unity or distinctness forms the basis of various schools of thought in Vedanta thus developing the Sampradayas. The thought process regarding Brahman range from total absence of the Charvakas to distinct existence of Atman and Brahman as believed in Dvaita Sampradaya. + − + + + + Line 21:
Line 24: + + + + +
Relationship of Atman and Brahman (view source)
Revision as of 16:21, 14 September 2019
, 16:21, 14 September 2019no edit summary
{{ToBeEdited}}
According to the Advaita Sampradaya the impersonal Brahman is essentially identical with the Atman. Many primary expressions of human nature such as, fear, sorrow, delusion etc are explained as ignorance of the being.
Relationship of [[Brahman (ब्रह्मन्)|Brahman]] and [[Atman (आत्मन्)|Atman]], the premises about their unity or distinctness forms the basis of various schools of thought in Vedanta thus developing the Sampradayas. The thought process regarding Brahman range from total absence of the Charvakas to distinct existence of Atman and Brahman as believed in Dvaita Sampradaya.
== Unity of Brahman and Atman ==
According to the Advaita siddhanta the impersonal Brahman is essentially identical with the Atman. Many primary expressions of human nature such as, fear, sorrow, delusion etc are explained as ignorance of the being.
====Brhdaranyaka Upanishad====
====Brhdaranyaka Upanishad====
The Upanishads discuss the metaphysical concept of Brahman in many ways, such as the Saṇḍilya vidya in Chandogya Upanishad (Adhyaya 14)<ref name="gjha314">Mm. Ganganatha Jha (1942) ''Chandogya Upanishad with the Commentary of Sankara.'' Poona : Oriental Book Agency ([https://archive.org/stream/Shankara.Bhashya-Chandogya.Upanishad-Ganganath.Jha.1942.English#page/n165/mode/2up Pages 150-157])</ref>. The Saṇḍilya vidya on Brahman is not unique to Chandogya Upanishad, but found in other ancient texts such as the Satapatha Brahmana (10.6.3<ref>Shatapata Brahmana ([https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%A5%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B9%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%A3%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D/%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A3%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A1%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D_%E0%A5%A7%E0%A5%A6/%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%A7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%83_%E0%A5%AC/%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B9%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%A3_%E0%A5%A9 Kanda 10 Adhyaya 6])</ref>). It asserts that Atman (Soul, Self inside man) exists, the Brahman is identical with Atman, that the Brahman is inside man – thematic quotations that are frequently cited by later schools of Hinduism and modern studies on Bharat's philosophies.
The Upanishads discuss the metaphysical concept of Brahman in many ways, such as the Saṇḍilya vidya in Chandogya Upanishad (Adhyaya 14)<ref name="gjha314">Mm. Ganganatha Jha (1942) ''Chandogya Upanishad with the Commentary of Sankara.'' Poona : Oriental Book Agency ([https://archive.org/stream/Shankara.Bhashya-Chandogya.Upanishad-Ganganath.Jha.1942.English#page/n165/mode/2up Pages 150-157])</ref>. The Saṇḍilya vidya on Brahman is not unique to Chandogya Upanishad, but found in other ancient texts such as the Satapatha Brahmana (10.6.3<ref>Shatapata Brahmana ([https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B6%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%A5%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B9%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%A3%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D/%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A3%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A1%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D_%E0%A5%A7%E0%A5%A6/%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%A7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%83_%E0%A5%AC/%E0%A4%AC%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B9%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%A3_%E0%A5%A9 Kanda 10 Adhyaya 6])</ref>). It asserts that Atman (Soul, Self inside man) exists, the Brahman is identical with Atman, that the Brahman is inside man – thematic quotations that are frequently cited by later schools of Hinduism and modern studies on Bharat's philosophies.
== References ==
<references />
[[Category:Vedanta]]
[[Category:Sampradayas]]