| For example, the name Ajaha is used for Sri Brahma, but primarily Ajaha name suggest to paramatma, who is beyond birth ad death. The different names like IndraKarma, Ishwara, Shiva, Kapila, Kamdeva, Tirthaka, Dhananjaya, Parjanya, Purandaraha, Prajapati, Bhima, Manu, Yadnya, Rudra, Varuna, Vasu, Vachaspati, Vayu, Vishwakarma, Vrishabha, Shambhu, etc. exhibit different aspects of the supreme Ishwara. Just like Lord Krishna exhibited Vishwarupa in the presence of Arjuna with unlimited faces, unlimited Shoulders, if he does the same with us, how will we and through which face are we suppose to recognize Him? How are we suppose to address him? This is the question of one of the Vedasukta, which is the subject of this chapter. | | For example, the name Ajaha is used for Sri Brahma, but primarily Ajaha name suggest to paramatma, who is beyond birth ad death. The different names like IndraKarma, Ishwara, Shiva, Kapila, Kamdeva, Tirthaka, Dhananjaya, Parjanya, Purandaraha, Prajapati, Bhima, Manu, Yadnya, Rudra, Varuna, Vasu, Vachaspati, Vayu, Vishwakarma, Vrishabha, Shambhu, etc. exhibit different aspects of the supreme Ishwara. Just like Lord Krishna exhibited Vishwarupa in the presence of Arjuna with unlimited faces, unlimited Shoulders, if he does the same with us, how will we and through which face are we suppose to recognize Him? How are we suppose to address him? This is the question of one of the Vedasukta, which is the subject of this chapter. |
| It is certainly true that every devas are different aspect of Ishwara, but which one is the source, such illogical and meaningless question is raised. Whether such questions are right or meaningless is not important, but unless one finds out the truth, it does not satisfy one. It has the potential to cause conflict between one sect to other sect. But from another perspective, this question has another meaning, that is, which name of the Ishwara has the capacity to hold all other names of Ishwara? | | It is certainly true that every devas are different aspect of Ishwara, but which one is the source, such illogical and meaningless question is raised. Whether such questions are right or meaningless is not important, but unless one finds out the truth, it does not satisfy one. It has the potential to cause conflict between one sect to other sect. But from another perspective, this question has another meaning, that is, which name of the Ishwara has the capacity to hold all other names of Ishwara? |