Changes

The king is a ruler of the kingdom (a ''corporate leader'') and  as a decision maker  has to be secretive about his war strategies (incubating new product developments) at the same time be offensive and defensive with enemies (''corporate rivalry and competition)'' as the threat perception may be ensuring his survival despite enemy attacks (''presence of substitutes and'' ''complementary products and disruptive technologies)''. Such preaching are of the nature of ''Gupta Mantra''.

The king is a ruler of the kingdom (a ''corporate leader'') and  as a decision maker  has to be secretive about his war strategies (incubating new product developments) at the same time be offensive and defensive with enemies (''corporate rivalry and competition)'' as the threat perception may be ensuring his survival despite enemy attacks (''presence of substitutes and'' ''complementary products and disruptive technologies)''. Such preaching are of the nature of ''Gupta Mantra''.

In economics, '''industrial organization''' or '''industrial economy''' is a field that builds on the theory of the firm by examining the structure of (and, therefore, the boundaries between) firms and markets. Industrial organization is not a  perfectly competitive model, due to real-world complications such as transaction costs, information asymmetry and inaccessibility (limited), and barriers to entry of new firms which obviously make it an imperfect competition. It analyzes determinants of firm and market organization and behavior as between competition and monopoly, including that of  government actions.  

In economics, '''industrial organization''' or '''industrial economy''' is a field that builds on the theory of the firm by examining the structure of (and, therefore, the boundaries between) firms and markets. Industrial organization is not a  perfectly competitive model, due to real-world complications such as transaction costs, information asymmetry and inaccessibility (limited), and barriers to entry of new firms which obviously make it an imperfect competition. It analyzes determinants of firm and market organization and behavior as between competition and monopoly, including that of  government actions. Government actions are governed by a legal system of the country. Extending the Arthashastra philosophy,  be it a nation or modern age business entity, the framework of industry, market  or firms is governed by an over-arching legal system.  

The central force of a political architecture is its legal system and the king is a protector and preserver of the law but most definitely not its creator which means his power  is sanctioned and  limited by law.  Be the powers vested, the actions of CEOs of companies are governed by the Companies Act , Income Tax Act, SEBI Regulations, and the likes of these. When no confidence motions (equivalent to dethroning a king) are passed against CEOs in the U.S, his kingship is challenged, by the  board of directors, for non-performance.  These consists of forces that affect the company, customers and profitability much against how it was envisioned. This establishes the temporal sovereignty of the CEO  where the V''arjasva Takat''  (Ultimate power) of the power owner is called into question resulting in dethroning the leader. Recent real-life corporate citations are available to corroborate this. This proves the temporal sovereign status of the corporate leader.  

The central force of a political architecture is its legal system and the king is a protector and preserver of the law but most definitely not its creator which means his power  is sanctioned and  limited by law.  Be the powers vested, the actions of CEOs of companies are governed by the Companies Act , Income Tax Act, SEBI Regulations, and the likes of these. When no confidence motions (equivalent to dethroning a king) are passed against CEOs in the U.S, his kingship is challenged, by the  board of directors, for non-performance.  These consists of forces that affect the company, customers and profitability much against how it was envisioned. This establishes the temporal sovereignty of the CEO  where the V''arjasva Takat''  (Ultimate power) of the power owner is called into question resulting in dethroning the leader. Recent real-life corporate citations are available to corroborate this. This proves the temporal sovereign status of the corporate leader.