Line 36: |
Line 36: |
| | | |
| Certain Shrauta and Grhyasutras clearly indicate their composition by a single author without any doubt. They are Shankhayana, Asvalayana, Baudhayana, Bhradvaja, Apastamba, Hiranyakeshi, Manava, Jaimini, Varaha and Varaha; where the authorship of both types of Sutras is ascribed by native tradition to a single teacher whose name is borne by both types of the Sutras. This can be ascertained by the facts such as cross-references to the Shrautasutra and a close agreement of the Sutras on both the vaidika yajnas and grhyayajnas, in language and style observed in them. | | Certain Shrauta and Grhyasutras clearly indicate their composition by a single author without any doubt. They are Shankhayana, Asvalayana, Baudhayana, Bhradvaja, Apastamba, Hiranyakeshi, Manava, Jaimini, Varaha and Varaha; where the authorship of both types of Sutras is ascribed by native tradition to a single teacher whose name is borne by both types of the Sutras. This can be ascertained by the facts such as cross-references to the Shrautasutra and a close agreement of the Sutras on both the vaidika yajnas and grhyayajnas, in language and style observed in them. |
| + | |
| + | === Textual Divisions === |
| + | The broadest division of the Kalpasutra texts such as Apastamba and Baudhayana is termed "Prashna". Each prashna is divided into sections called "kandika" and "khanda" respectively. Further divisions are called "patala" in Apastamba sutras and "adhyayas" in Baudhayana. Texts of Gautama and Vasishta are divided simply into "adhyayas". The smallest division of all these documents is into "sutras". |
| + | |
| + | Vadhula shrautasutras are divided into Prapathakas, Anuvakas, Khandas or Patalas. |
| | | |
| === The Four Sutra Charanas === | | === The Four Sutra Charanas === |
Line 48: |
Line 53: |
| शुल्बसूत्राणि || Shulbasutras | | शुल्बसूत्राणि || Shulbasutras |
| | | |
− | Some of these four types of texts belonging to the same school were composed by one and the same author in some cases. All the Vedas possess their distinct Kalpasutras, their number being the largest for Yajurveda and the smallest being two for Atharvaveda. The kalpasutras belonging to the Yajurveda are complete (with all the four sutragranthas) whereas those belonging to other Vedas are deficient in one or the other type of Sutras. | + | Some of these four types of texts belonging to the same school were composed by one and the same author in some cases. All the Vedas possess their distinct Kalpasutras, their number being the largest for Yajurveda and the smallest being two for Atharvaveda. A few kalpasutras belonging to the Yajurveda are complete (with all the four sutragranthas) whereas those belonging to other Vedas are deficient in one or the other type of Sutras. The complete Complete set of Kalpasutras available in the present day belong to that of Baudhayana, Apastamba, and Hiranyakeshi belonging to the Taittriya shaka of Krishna Yajurveda. |
| | | |
| The sutras were either intended by their authors for more than one Charana or adapted to more than one Shaka of the Veda over time. No single shaka contained a complete account of the ceremony and other shakas were often referred to thus came into the existence the Sutra texts. Hence we find references of various shaka authors and their stance on any particular ceremony. Gradually communities coalesced, by adopting a collection of Sutras as the highest authority for their ceremonies, and became naturally inclined to waive minor points of difference in the Samhitas and Brahmanas. Such communities passed on their tradition under the name of the Charana and the Sutrakara who compiled them. This tradition is seen even in the present day where a person is said to belong to a Gotra (the rshi lineage) and Sutra (Baudhayana, Shankhayana, Apastamba etc) which is informed in the Pravara recitation during various ceremonies.<ref name=":8">Mookerji. Radha Kumud, (1947) Ancient Indian Education (Brahminical and Buddhist) London: MacMillan And Co., Ltd. (Page 167-168)</ref> | | The sutras were either intended by their authors for more than one Charana or adapted to more than one Shaka of the Veda over time. No single shaka contained a complete account of the ceremony and other shakas were often referred to thus came into the existence the Sutra texts. Hence we find references of various shaka authors and their stance on any particular ceremony. Gradually communities coalesced, by adopting a collection of Sutras as the highest authority for their ceremonies, and became naturally inclined to waive minor points of difference in the Samhitas and Brahmanas. Such communities passed on their tradition under the name of the Charana and the Sutrakara who compiled them. This tradition is seen even in the present day where a person is said to belong to a Gotra (the rshi lineage) and Sutra (Baudhayana, Shankhayana, Apastamba etc) which is informed in the Pravara recitation during various ceremonies.<ref name=":8">Mookerji. Radha Kumud, (1947) Ancient Indian Education (Brahminical and Buddhist) London: MacMillan And Co., Ltd. (Page 167-168)</ref> |
Line 60: |
Line 65: |
| | | |
| === Vedas and Associated Sutra Charanas === | | === Vedas and Associated Sutra Charanas === |
| + | Mahadeva the commentator of Hiranyakeshi Shrautasutras, in his work called Vyjayanti tika, summarizes the six Sutrakaras of Taittriya Shaka of Krishna Yajurveda as follows<ref name=":122" /><blockquote>यत्राकरोत् सूत्रमतीव गौरवाद् बौघयनाचार्यवरोऽर्थगुप्तये। तथा भरद्वाज मुनीश्वरस्तथाऽऽपस्तम्ब आचार्य इदं परं स्फुटम् ||</blockquote><blockquote>अतीव गूढार्थमनन्यदर्शितं न्यायैश्च युक्तं रचयन्नसौ पुनः। हिरण्यकेशीति यथार्थनामभाग् अभूद्वरात्तुष्ट मुनीन्द्रसम्मतात् ||</blockquote><blockquote>वाथूल आचार्यवरोऽकरोत् परं सूत्रं तु यत् केरल देशसंस्थितम्। वैखानसाचार्यकृतं त्वथापरं पूर्तेन युक्तं त्विति सूत्र षड्विधा || (Vyjayanti Bhumika, Shlokas 7-9)</blockquote>In the above shlokas Mahadeva states the order and names of the six sutrakaras - Baudhayana, Bharadvaja, Apastamba, Hiranyakeshi, Vaikhanasa and Vadhula. Baudhayana is also known as "Pravachanakara". |
| {| class="wikitable" | | {| class="wikitable" |
− | |+Vedas and Associated Sutra Works<ref name=":42222" /><ref name=":4" /><ref name=":122">Pt. Baldev Upadhyaya (1997) ''Samskrit Vangmay ka Brhad Itihas, Dvitiya Khand - Vedang.'' Lucknow: Uttar Pradesh Samskrit Sansthan (Pages 56-112)</ref> | + | |+Vedas and Associated Sutra Works<ref name=":42222" /><ref name=":122">Pt. Baldev Upadhyaya (1997) ''Samskrit Vangmay ka Brhad Itihas, Dvitiya Khand - Vedang.'' Lucknow: Uttar Pradesh Samskrit Sansthan (Pages 56-112)</ref> |
| !Vedas | | !Vedas |
| !Shakas | | !Shakas |
Line 70: |
Line 76: |
| |- | | |- |
| ! rowspan="3" |Rigveda | | ! rowspan="3" |Rigveda |
− | |Shakala | + | |Shakala amd Bashkala |
| |Ashvalayana (आश्वलायनः) | | |Ashvalayana (आश्वलायनः) |
| |Ashvalayana | | |Ashvalayana |
Line 94: |
Line 100: |
| ! rowspan="4" |Krishna Yajurveda | | ! rowspan="4" |Krishna Yajurveda |
| |Taittriya | | |Taittriya |
− | |Baudhayana (बौधायनः), Apastamba (आपस्तम्बः), Hiranyakeshi (हिरण्यकेशी), Vaikhanasa, Bharadvaja | + | |'''Baudhayana (बौधायनः)''', '''Apastamba (आपस्तम्बः)''', '''Hiranyakeshi (हिरण्यकेशी)''', Vaikhanasa, Bharadvaja |
− | |Baudhayana, Apastamba, Hiranyakeshi, Varaha, Bharadvaja, Vaikhanasa | + | |'''Baudhayana, Apastamba''', '''Hiranyakeshi''', Varaha, Bharadvaja, Vaikhanasa |
− | |Baudhayana, Apastamba, Hiranyakeshi | + | |'''Baudhayana, Apastamba''', '''Hiranyakeshi,''' Vaikhanasa |
− | |Baudhayana, Apastamba, | + | |'''Baudhayana, Apastamba, Hiranyakeshi''', |
| Varaha (वाराहः) | | Varaha (वाराहः) |
| |- | | |- |
Line 103: |
Line 109: |
| |Vadhula (वाधूलः)<ref name=":122" /> | | |Vadhula (वाधूलः)<ref name=":122" /> |
| |Agnivesya | | |Agnivesya |
− | |None available | + | | rowspan="3" |None available |
| |Vadhula (वाधूलः) | | |Vadhula (वाधूलः) |
| |- | | |- |
Line 109: |
Line 115: |
| |Manava (मानवः) Varaha (वाराह)<ref name=":122" /> | | |Manava (मानवः) Varaha (वाराह)<ref name=":122" /> |
| |Manava | | |Manava |
− | |
| |
| |Manava, Maitrayana | | |Manava, Maitrayana |
| |- | | |- |
Line 115: |
Line 120: |
| |Kathaka (काठक) | | |Kathaka (काठक) |
| |Kathaka (काठक) | | |Kathaka (काठक) |
− | |
| |
| |None available | | |None available |
| |- | | |- |
Line 122: |
Line 126: |
| |Arsheya (आर्षेयः), Latyayana (लाट्यायनः) | | |Arsheya (आर्षेयः), Latyayana (लाट्यायनः) |
| |Gobhila (गोभिल) | | |Gobhila (गोभिल) |
− | | | + | | rowspan="2" |None available |
| | rowspan="3" |None available | | | rowspan="3" |None available |
| |- | | |- |
Line 128: |
Line 132: |
| |Drahyayana (द्राह्यायनः) | | |Drahyayana (द्राह्यायनः) |
| |Khadira (खादिर) | | |Khadira (खादिर) |
− | |
| |
| |- | | |- |
| |Jaimini | | |Jaimini |
Line 144: |
Line 147: |
| | | |
| === Comparison of the Sutra Charanas === | | === Comparison of the Sutra Charanas === |
− | Here below are a the distinctions between Shrauta, Grhya and Dharmasutras. The Sulbasutras are considered more as manuals for measurements and setting up altars thus their subject matter being completely different is not listed in this table. | + | Here below are the distinctions between Shrauta, Grhya and Dharmasutras. The Sulbasutras are considered more as manuals for measurements and setting up altars thus their subject matter being completely different is not listed in this table. |
| {| class="wikitable" | | {| class="wikitable" |
| |+Shrautasutras, Grhyasutras and Dharmasutras- Contrasting Points<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":3">Kane, Pandurang Vaman. (1930) ''History of Dharmasastra (Ancient and Medieval Religious and Civil Law), Volume 1.'' Poona : Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. (Pages 1-13)</ref> | | |+Shrautasutras, Grhyasutras and Dharmasutras- Contrasting Points<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":3">Kane, Pandurang Vaman. (1930) ''History of Dharmasastra (Ancient and Medieval Religious and Civil Law), Volume 1.'' Poona : Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. (Pages 1-13)</ref> |