Chitta (चित्तम्)
Chitta (also citta, Samskrit: चित्तम्) is described as one of the states of mind, according to the texts of Vedanta.
वेदान्तमते चित्तस्यावस्थाविशेषः ।[1]
Maharshi Patanjali in his Yoga Sutras uses the word "chitta" in a broad sense, that can be considered to represent the whole of psyche or mind as referred in modern psychology.[2] However, the term citta should not be understood to mean only the mind. Citta has three components: mind (manas), intelligence (buddhi) and ego (ahankara) which combine into one composite whole.[3]
Etymology
Chitta is formed from the dhatus चितीँ संज्ञाने । chiti samjnane and चितिँ स्मृत्याम्। chiti smrityam[4] in the meanings of having knowledge and repetitive remembrance (or memory) of objects/subjects known.
According to Shabdakalpadhruma, chitta is one of the states of the mind and includes the five Chitta Bhumis namely Kshipta, Mudha, Vikshipta, Ekagra and Niruddha.
वेदान्तमते चित्तस्यावस्थाविशेषः । यथा । क्षिप्तं मूढं विक्षिप्तं एकाग्रं निरुद्धं इति पञ्चभूमयः ।[1]
Maharshi Vyasa defines chitta as a combination of trigunas.
चित्तं हि प्रख्याप्रवृत्तिस्थितिशीलत्वात् त्रिगुणम्। (Vyas. Bhas. on Yoga. Sutr. 1.2)
Maharshi Patanjali's Yoga darshana is founded on the philosophical paradigm of Sankhya darshana. Yoga defines chitta as the subtlest form Matter, and constituting of three vehicles namely
- the thought-vehicle (Manas)
- the I-vehicle (Ahamkara) and
- the Pure-Reason vehicle (Buddhi)
Chitta Bhumis
According to Vyasa bhashya on the Yoga Sutra (1.2) of Patanjali, chitta can be in classified into five different states,[2][5]
क्षिप्तं मूढं विक्षिप्तम् एकाग्रं निरुद्धम् इति चित्तभूमयः।
- kshipta, a mental force which is scattered, in a state of disarray and neglect
- mũdha, a foolish, confused and dull state
- vikshipta, puzzled, agitated and distracted
- ekāgra, a state of one-pointed attention, concentrated
- niruddha, where everything is restrained, controlled
These states of mind partake of many physical and psychological characteristics and they are determined by the trigunas - satva, rajas, and tamas. The mind is possessed of the three qualities, showing as it does the nature of illumination, activity and inertia.[6]
चित्तं हि प्रख्याप्रवृत्तिस्थितिशीलत्वात् त्रिगुणम्। (Vyas. Bhas. on Yoga. Sutr. 1.2)
The relation between them is as follows:
1. kshipta, is when the mind is distracted by rajasic impulses
2. mũdha, is when it remains inert, as in sleep, on account of tamas;
3. vikshipta, is when the distraction alternates with tranquility caused by satva
4. ekāgra, is when the chitta stripped of rajasic and tamasic propensities and attains to one-pointedness as a result of the sātvic trait.
5. niruddha is when all modifications remain totally restrained and abide by potencies (Iyengar, 1993[3]; Subramanian, 2008).
Although the concept of chitta bhumike was contributed by Vyāsa, over a period of time various philosophers, practitioners, experts and scholars have given different explanations and interpretations. They have noted that practice of Yoga system of Patanjali essentially involves a change in the chitta bhũmike, the state of mind, and it is only when a person is predominantly characterized by a vikshipta state of mind he/she will be drawn towards spirituality.
According to Vedanta, the various chitta bhumis are as follows
- आसुरसम्पल्लोकशास्त्रदेहवासनासु वर्त्तमानं चित्तं क्षिप्तभूमिका । १ ।
- निद्रातन्द्रादिग्रस्तं चित्तं मूढभूमिका । २ ।
- कदाचिद्ध्यानयुक्तं चित्तं क्षिप्ताद्विशिष्टतया विक्षिप्तभूमिका । ३ ।[1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Shabdakalpadhruma (See text भूमिका)
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Jayasheela, S. and Salagame, Kiran Kumar. Triguņa and chitta bhũmike in Yoga practitioners. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 2018, 9(1), 33-37
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Iyengar, B.K.S. (1993). Light on the yoga sutras of Patanjali. London: Harper Collins Publishers London. pp.11
- ↑ See citta at https://ashtadhyayi.com/dhatu/
- ↑ Iyengar, B.K.S. (1993). Light on the yoga sutras of Patanjali. London: Harper Collins Publishers London. pp.186
- ↑ Prasada, Rama. tran. Patanjali's Yoga Sutras, with the commentary of Vyasa and the gloss of Vachaspati Misra. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 1998. p 5-6