Changes

The history of India over the past centuries bears witness to the fact that India was at no time a single political unit. Even during the reign of the Maurya dynasty, though a large part of the country was under the sovereignty of the Maurya kings, there were considerable portions of the territory which were under the rule of independent kingdoms. So also during the Moghul rule which extended over large parts of the territory of India, there were independent rulers who enjoyed political sovereignty over the territories of their respective kingdoms. It is an interesting fact of history that India was forged into a nation neither on account of common language nor on account of the continued existence of a single political regime over its territories but on account of a common culture evolved over the centuries. It is cultural unity -something more fundamental and enduring than any other bond which may unite the people of a country together -which has welded this country into a nation.

The history of India over the past centuries bears witness to the fact that India was at no time a single political unit. Even during the reign of the Maurya dynasty, though a large part of the country was under the sovereignty of the Maurya kings, there were considerable portions of the territory which were under the rule of independent kingdoms. So also during the Moghul rule which extended over large parts of the territory of India, there were independent rulers who enjoyed political sovereignty over the territories of their respective kingdoms. It is an interesting fact of history that India was forged into a nation neither on account of common language nor on account of the continued existence of a single political regime over its territories but on account of a common culture evolved over the centuries. It is cultural unity -something more fundamental and enduring than any other bond which may unite the people of a country together -which has welded this country into a nation.

Thus, it is the samskriti (culture) which was evolved in this country from times immemorial which not only welded the people of this country into a nation but also made it invincible and consequently the country has survived, despite all sorts of onslaughts to which it was subjected to from time to time during the last nearly one thousand years.

Thus, it is the samskriti (culture) which was evolved in this country from times immemorial which not only welded the people of this country into a nation but also made it invincible and consequently the country has survived, despite all sorts of onslaughts to which it was subjected to from time to time during the last nearly one thousand years.

Sarvajna Narayana in his "Hitopadesha" (words of wisdom) in his inimitable style expounds the distinction between human beings and animals and says that man's legitimate claim to superiority over the animals would be valid only if he conforms to Dharma. The verse reads:<blockquote>vkgkjfunzkHk;eSFkquapA lkekU;esrr i'kqfHkuZjk.kkeà /keksZ fg rs"kkef/kdks fo'ks"kks /kesZ.k ghuk% i'kqfHkLlekuk%AA'''

Sarvajna Narayana in his "Hitopadesha" (words of wisdom) in his inimitable style expounds the distinction between human beings and animals and says that man's legitimate claim to superiority over the animals would be valid only if he conforms to Dharma. The verse reads:<blockquote>'''vkgkjfunzkHk;eSFkquapA lkekU;esrr i'kqfHkuZjk.kkeà /keksZ fg rs"kkef/kdks fo'ks"kks /kesZ.k ghuk% i'kqfHkLlekuk%AA'''

</blockquote><blockquote>Consumption of food, sleep, fear, and enjoyment of sex are common to man and animal. But, 'Dharma' is a special attribute of man. Bereft of 'Dharma', man is equal to animal.Therefore everyone should conform to dharma (right conduct). Otherwise he is no better than an animals.

</blockquote><blockquote>Consumption of food, sleep, fear, and enjoyment of sex are common to man and animal. But, 'Dharma' is a special attribute of man. Bereft of 'Dharma', man is equal to animal.Therefore everyone should conform to dharma (right conduct). Otherwise he is no better than an animals.

The above said verse of Rigveda is almost similar though most ancient.

The above said verse of Rigveda is almost similar though most ancient.

lekuh o vkÑfr% lekuk ân;kfu o%A lekueLrq oks euks ;Fkk o% lqlgklfrAA

'''lekuh o vkÑfr% lekuk ân;kfu o%A lekueLrq oks euks ;Fkk o% lqlgklfrAA'''

 

Let there be oneness in your resolutions, hearts and minds. Let the strength to live with mutual co-operation be firm in you all.

Let there be oneness in your resolutions, hearts and minds. Let the strength to live with mutual co-operation be firm in you all.

'''lekuh izik lg oksTMkHkkx%A lekus ;ksD=s lg oks ;qufTeA vjk% ukfHkfeokfHkr%AA

'''lekuh izik lg oksTMkHkkx%A lekus ;ksD=s lg oks ;qufTeA vjk% ukfHkfeokfHkr%AA

ATHARVANAVEDA – SAMJNANA SUKTA'''

== ATHARVANAVEDA – SAMJNANA SUKTA ==

 

All have equal rights to articles of food and water. The yoke of the chariot of life is placed equally on the shoulders of all. All should live together in harmony supporting one another like the spokes of a wheel of the chariot connecting its rim and the hub.

All have equal rights to articles of food and water. The yoke of the chariot of life is placed equally on the shoulders of all. All should live together in harmony supporting one another like the spokes of a wheel of the chariot connecting its rim and the hub.

These Vedic provisions forcefully declare equality among all human beings. The last of them impresses that just as no spoke of a wheel is superior to another, no individual can claim to be, or regarded as, superior to others. This was the grand concept of equality in this country at the earliest period of civilization. However, we see a few patently discriminatory provisions in the Smritis in the matter of imposition of penalties and the division of the society, which came to be called 'Hindu' for historical reasons, into innumerable castes, some of them claim to be superior to others with varying customs and usages which have brought about inequality, resulting in discrimination against certain classes of people The worst of it is the practice of untouchability with all the incidental inhuman and humiliating treatment meted out to those who were regarded as 'untouchables'. So the question that naturally arises is, were all these sanctioned by Dharma? It is not so. The very expression Dharma is opposed to and inconsistent with any such social inequality. The relevant provisions of the Shruti (Vedas) leave no room for doubt that discrimination on the ground of birth or otherwise had no Vedic sanction; on the other hand such discrimination was plainly opposed to vedic injunction. Discrimination of any kind is, therefore, contrary to Dharma. It is really Adharma. It should however be pointed that though society had been divided some time later, on functional basis, into four Varnas (Chaturvana) namely 1. Brahmanas, the class of persons taking to teaching and other learned professions; 2. Kshatriyas, warriors and the ruting class; 3. Vyshyas, the class of persons undertaking trade, commerce and agriculture and 4. Sudras, the class of persons rendering another essential services to the society, the superiority or inferiority of an individual does not seem to have been determined by birth in anyone of these classes, For instance, Valmiki and Vyasa, the authors of the two great epics, the Ramayana and Mahabharatha, who are regarded as the greatest poets, writers and philosophers of the country and who are held in the highest esteem down to this day by all sections of the society, belonged to the fourth and the second varna, respectively. This is also the case as regards the heroes of these two great epics. Raffia, belonging to Kshatriya class, because of his superb qualities as a man and as an ideal ruler, has won a place in the hearts of one and all for ever. So too Krishna, the greatest of diplomats and warriors, and a great teacher, being the propounder of the immortal Bhagvadgita. Both these are adored and worshipped by all sections of the society as incarnations of God Himself.

These Vedic provisions forcefully declare equality among all human beings. The last of them impresses that just as no spoke of a wheel is superior to another, no individual can claim to be, or regarded as, superior to others. This was the grand concept of equality in this country at the earliest period of civilization. However, we see a few patently discriminatory provisions in the Smritis in the matter of imposition of penalties and the division of the society, which came to be called 'Hindu' for historical reasons, into innumerable castes, some of them claim to be superior to others with varying customs and usages which have brought about inequality, resulting in discrimination against certain classes of people The worst of it is the practice of untouchability with all the incidental inhuman and humiliating treatment meted out to those who were regarded as 'untouchables'. So the question that naturally arises is, were all these sanctioned by Dharma? It is not so. The very expression Dharma is opposed to and inconsistent with any such social inequality. The relevant provisions of the Shruti (Vedas) leave no room for doubt that discrimination on the ground of birth or otherwise had no Vedic sanction; on the other hand such discrimination was plainly opposed to vedic injunction. Discrimination of any kind is, therefore, contrary to Dharma. It is really Adharma. It should however be pointed that though society had been divided some time later, on functional basis, into four Varnas (Chaturvana) namely 1. Brahmanas, the class of persons taking to teaching and other learned professions; 2. Kshatriyas, warriors and the ruting class; 3. Vyshyas, the class of persons undertaking trade, commerce and agriculture and 4. Sudras, the class of persons rendering another essential services to the society, the superiority or inferiority of an individual does not seem to have been determined by birth in anyone of these classes, For instance, Valmiki and Vyasa, the authors of the two great epics, the Ramayana and Mahabharatha, who are regarded as the greatest poets, writers and philosophers of the country and who are held in the highest esteem down to this day by all sections of the society, belonged to the fourth and the second varna, respectively. This is also the case as regards the heroes of these two great epics. Raffia, belonging to Kshatriya class, because of his superb qualities as a man and as an ideal ruler, has won a place in the hearts of one and all for ever. So too Krishna, the greatest of diplomats and warriors, and a great teacher, being the propounder of the immortal Bhagvadgita. Both these are adored and worshipped by all sections of the society as incarnations of God Himself.