Difference between revisions of "Nyaya (न्यायः)"
(Changed Category and edited non-translatables) |
(Started "Sources of Nyaya" section) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<ref name="LCHI-Rama_Jois-Ch2"/> | <ref name="LCHI-Rama_Jois-Ch2"/> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
− | Two notable aspects of Nyaya as defined in Brhadaranyaka Upanishad are that it is considered superior even to the Raja (unlike in western jurisprudence where law is declared by a political superior<ref name="LCHI-Rama_Jois-Ch2"/>), and that Nyaya and the Raja mutually strengthen each other. A Raja who is obedient to Rajadharma and an able enforcer of Vyavaharadharma in the Rajya will remain powerful. Nyaya limits the Raja himself, who is the enforcer of Nyaya but never its source. | + | Two notable aspects of Nyaya as defined in Brhadaranyaka Upanishad are that it is considered superior even to the Raja (unlike in western jurisprudence where law is declared by a political superior<ref name="LCHI-Rama_Jois-Ch2"/>), and that Nyaya and the Raja mutually strengthen each other. A Raja who is obedient to Rajadharma and an able enforcer of Vyavaharadharma in the Rajya will remain powerful. Nyaya limits the Raja himself, who is the enforcer of Nyaya but never its source.<ref name="LCHI-Rama_Jois-Ch3">Justice M. Rama Jois, ''Legal and Constitutional History of India'' (2016), Chapter 3, Pages 13-15</ref> |
+ | ==Sources of Nyaya== | ||
+ | Nyaya was laid down in the Dharmasastras (धर्मशास्त्राः) written by Rshis (ऋषीः). The [[Vedas (वेदाः)|Vedas (वेदाः)]] and [[Smrti (स्मृतिः)|Smrtis]] are the primary sources of Nyaya. However, the Rshis were aware that Nyaya once declared cannot remain as it is for ages, without additions or modifications. The following words by Manu and [[Yajnavalkya (याज्ञवल्क्यः)|Yajnavalkya (याज्ञवल्क्यः)]] respectively, reflect this thought. Note that the word Dharma means Nyaya in these descriptions. | ||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | <q>Veda is the first source of Dharma. The expression by Seers (Smritikaras), handed down from generation to generation by memory, the virtuous conduct of those who are well versed in the Vedas, and lastly, what is agreeable to good conscience, are the other sources.</q><ref name="LCHI-Rama_Jois-Ch3"/> | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | <q>The Vedas, the Smritis, good conduct or approved usage, what is agreeable to conscience proceeding from good intention, are the sources of law.</q><ref name="LCHI-Rama_Jois-Ch3"/> | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
+ | The Smrtikaras (स्मृतिकाराः) have thoughtfully recognised practices of people who are pure and care for the society as a source of Nyaya to make Nyaya relevant at all times. | ||
+ | ===Superiority of the sources=== | ||
+ | To avoid ambiguity in interpretation, the Smrtikaras had also laid down guidelines to be followed in case of a conflict from different sources. [[Vyasa Maharshi (व्यासमहर्षिः)|Vyasa (व्यासः)]] stated that the Vedas must always be considered as the primary source. | ||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | <q>Whenever there is a conflict between Shruti (Vedas), Smritis and Puranas, then what is stated in the Shruti should be taken as authority.</q><ref name="LCHI-Rama_Jois-Ch3"/> | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
+ | Further, Yajnavalkya stated the following. | ||
+ | <blockquote> | ||
+ | <q>Whenever two Smritis conflict, principles of equity as determined by popular usages shall prevail.</q><ref name="LCHI-Rama_Jois-Ch3"/> | ||
+ | </blockquote> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Dharmas]] | [[Category:Dharmas]] |
Revision as of 15:52, 2 January 2019
Nyaya (translates to law) was laid down as an instrument to govern a Rajya (State), which was considered an essential for a society to follow Dharma. Dharma, which has different meanings based on the context used, means Nyaya in a legal context. Nyaya constitutes Vyavaharadharma (व्यवहारधर्मः) and Rajadharma (राजधर्मः). Vyavaharadharma is the positive civil and criminal law, as also the law regulating the constitution and organisation of State
[1] and Rajadharma is the law laying down powers, duties and responsibilities of a Raja
.[1] Raja was entrusted with power by Rajadharma to enforce obedience of the people to Vyavaharadharma in the Rajya.
Relation between Nyaya and Raja
Nyaya is superior to the Raja and entrusts Raja with the duty of protecting people. Brhadaranyaka Upanishad (बृहदारण्यक उपनिषद्) defines Nyaya as follows.
Law is the king of kings; Nothing is superior to law;[1]
The law aided by the power of the king enables the weak to prevail over strong.
Two notable aspects of Nyaya as defined in Brhadaranyaka Upanishad are that it is considered superior even to the Raja (unlike in western jurisprudence where law is declared by a political superior[1]), and that Nyaya and the Raja mutually strengthen each other. A Raja who is obedient to Rajadharma and an able enforcer of Vyavaharadharma in the Rajya will remain powerful. Nyaya limits the Raja himself, who is the enforcer of Nyaya but never its source.[2]
Sources of Nyaya
Nyaya was laid down in the Dharmasastras (धर्मशास्त्राः) written by Rshis (ऋषीः). The Vedas (वेदाः) and Smrtis are the primary sources of Nyaya. However, the Rshis were aware that Nyaya once declared cannot remain as it is for ages, without additions or modifications. The following words by Manu and Yajnavalkya (याज्ञवल्क्यः) respectively, reflect this thought. Note that the word Dharma means Nyaya in these descriptions.
Veda is the first source of Dharma. The expression by Seers (Smritikaras), handed down from generation to generation by memory, the virtuous conduct of those who are well versed in the Vedas, and lastly, what is agreeable to good conscience, are the other sources.[2]
The Vedas, the Smritis, good conduct or approved usage, what is agreeable to conscience proceeding from good intention, are the sources of law.[2]
The Smrtikaras (स्मृतिकाराः) have thoughtfully recognised practices of people who are pure and care for the society as a source of Nyaya to make Nyaya relevant at all times.
Superiority of the sources
To avoid ambiguity in interpretation, the Smrtikaras had also laid down guidelines to be followed in case of a conflict from different sources. Vyasa (व्यासः) stated that the Vedas must always be considered as the primary source.
Whenever there is a conflict between Shruti (Vedas), Smritis and Puranas, then what is stated in the Shruti should be taken as authority.[2]
Further, Yajnavalkya stated the following.
Whenever two Smritis conflict, principles of equity as determined by popular usages shall prevail.[2]