Difference between revisions of "Vedanta (वेदान्तः)"

Samkhya	Kapila;
Yoga	Patanjali;
Vaisheshika	Kanada, Prashastapada;
Dvaitadvaita	Nimbarka;
Shuddhadvaita	Vallabha Acharya;

Revision as of 15:46, 20 September 2017

Template:Hindu scriptures

Vedanta (IAST, Vedānta, Sanskrit: वेदांत) or Uttara Mīmāṃsā is one of the six orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy. Primarily the word Vedanta stood for Upanishads; afterwords, its denotation widened to include all thoughts developed out of the Upanishads^[1]. Vedanta, its denotation as understood and accepted by its major schools, refers to various philosophical traditions based on the three basic texts of Hindu philosophy, namely the Principal Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras and the Bhagavad Gita.Template:Sfn^[2]^[3]

Vedanta adopted ideas from other schools of Hinduism such as Yoga and Nyaya,^[4]^[5] and, over time, became the most prominent of the orthodox schools of Hinduism, influencing the diverse traditions within it.^[6]^[7] There are at least ten schools of Vedanta,Template:Sfn of which Advaita Vedanta, Vishishtadvaita, Dvaita and Bhedabheda are the best known.Template:Sfn

Etymology and Nomenclature

Vedanta literally means the end of the Vedas^[1]. All the diverse schools of Vedanta claim to propound the Upanishadic teaching^[8]. The Upanishads may be regarded as the end of Vedas in different senses:

The Upanishads were the last literary products of the Vedic period. The literature of this period is broadly classified into three kinds - the Samhitas, the Brahmanas and the Upanishads. The three collectively form the Vedas. The Upanishads discuss the philosophical problems and form the last layer or the end of the Vedas.
In respect of study, the Upanishads were studied the last, during Vanprastha and Sannyasa.
The Upanishads mark the culmination of Vedic thought. ^[9]

Vedanta is also called Uttara Mīmāṃsā, or the 'latter enquiry' or 'higher enquiry', and is often paired with Purva Mīmāṃsā, the 'former enquiry' or 'primary enquiry'. Pūrva Mimamsa and also Karma Mimamsa, usually simply called Mimamsa, deals with explanations of the Karma-kanda or rituals part of the Vedic mantras (in the Samhita portion of the Vedas) and Brahmanas, while Vedanta deals with the Upanishads or the Jnana-kanda of the Vedas.^[10]

The Vedanta school has been historically referred to by various names, the early names being the Upanishadic ones (Aupanisada), the doctrine of the end of the Vedas (Vedanta-vada), the doctrine of Brahman (Brahma-vada), and the doctrine that Brahman is the cause (Brahma-karana-vada).Template:Sfn

Prasthantrayi, the Three Basic Texts

In the current view, the Upanishads, The Bhagavadgita and the Vedanta Sutra constitute the triple basis of Vedanta. All schools of the vedanta propound their philosophy by interpreting these texts, called the Prasthanatrayi, literally, three sources^[11].

The Upanishads, known as Upadesha prasthana (injunctive texts), and the Śruti prasthāna (the starting point of revelation)
The Vedanta Sutra or Brahma Sutras, known as Nyaya prasthana or Yukti prasthana (logical text)
The Bhagavad Gita, a part of the Mahabharata, is known as Sadhana prasthana (practical text), and the Smriti prasthāna (the starting point of remembered tradition)

The Upanishads were many in number and developed in the different Vedic schools at different times and places (the names of up to 112 Upanishads have been recorded)^[12]. All major commentators have considered twelve to thirteen of these texts as the principle Upanishads.

The problems discussed and solutions offered in the Upanishads presented differences despite a unity of general outlook. The indefiniteness of the teaching of the Upanishads led to a necessity for its systematization. The systematization, in all likelihood, was effected in more than one way; but the only attempt that has survived is represented by the Sutras of Badarayana Vyasa popularly known as Vedanta Sutra or Brahma Sutra^[13].

All major Vedantic teachers, like Shankaracharya, Ramanujacharya, and Madhvacharya, have composed extensive commentaries not only on the Upanishads and Brahma Sutras, but also on the Bhagavad Gita. While it is not typically thought of as a purely Vedantic text, with its syncretism of Samkhya, Yoga, and Upanishadic thought, the Bhagavad Gita has played a strong role in Vedantic thought.^[14]

History

The Upanishads do not contain "a rigorous philosophical inquiry identifying the doctrines and formulating the supporting arguments."Template:Sfn This philosophical inquiry was performed by the darsanas, the various philosophical schools.Template:Sfn The schools trace their antiquity far back into the Vedas and the early seers. Advaita Vedanta and Vishishtadvaita Vedanta existed prior to Shankara and Ramanuja respectively but found their most influential expounder in them.^[15]

Of the Vedanta-school before the composition of the Brahma Sutras (400–450 BCTemplate:Sfn) almost nothing is known.Template:Sfn Very little also is known of the period between the Brahma Sutras and Shankara (first half of the 8th century BC).Template:Sfn Only two writings of this period have survived: the Vākyapadīya, written by Bhartṛhari (second half 5th centuryTemplate:Sfn), and the Māndūkya-kārikā written by Gaudapada (7th century BC).Template:Sfn

Vedanta before the Brahma Sutras

Not much remains of the teachings of Vedanta from this period.

Pre-Shankara doctrines and sayings can be traced in the works of the later schools, which does give some insight into the development of early Vedanta philosophy.Template:Sfn

Badarayana was not the first person to systematise the teachings of the Upanishads.Template:Sfn He refers to seven Vedantic teachers before him:Template:Sfn

From the way in which Bādarāyana cites the views of others it is obvious that the teachings of the Upanishads must have been analyzed and interpreted by quite a few before him and that his systematization of them in 555 sutras arranged in four chapters must have been the last attempt, most probably the best.Template:Sfn

Badarayana Vyasa's Brahma Sutras

In the Brahma Sutras, also called the Vedanta Sutra,Template:Sfn Template:Refn Badarayan Vyasa summarized the teachings of the upanishads ^[16]. The identity of Badarayana is not well established. Traditions often ascribe the authorship of the Brahma Sutras to Vyasa, who has variously been called Badarayana.

The Brahma Sutras have traditionally been ascribed to Badarayana,Template:Refn and antiquity quoted as 200 CETemplate:Sfn. However, some scholars understand it as a group of sutras composed by multiple authors over the course of hundreds of yearsTemplate:Sfn that were most likely compiled in the present form around 400–450 CE,Template:Sfn Template:Sfn but "the great part of the Sutra must have been in existence much earlier than that."Template:Sfn

The Brahma Sutras has been written in four chapters, each divided into four quarters or sections.^[13] The cryptic aphorisms of the Vedanta Sutras are open to a variety of interpretations, resulting in the formation of numerous Vedanta schools, each interpreting the texts in its own way and producing its own commentary.Template:Sfn As a consequence, the divergence of views, originally prevalent in the form of seemingly diverse verses of the Upanishads, re-asserted themselves and have continued in more or less the same form even after the composition of the sutra.^[13]

Vedanta between the Brahma Sutras and Adi Shankara

The vagueness of the Upanishadic teaching is particularly in reference to the relation of Brahman to the individual soul (Jiva) on the one hand, and to the physical universe on the other. Statements about their identity in the principal Upanishads are many and prominent and those distinguishing the two expressly are not altogether wanting. The first problem to solve for any one attempting to systematize the teaching of the Upanishads is accordingly to harmonize these two sets of statements. The most obvious way of doing so is to attach equal value to both classes of statements and theorize that the soul and the world are both identical with and different from Brahman. That was the view held by Bhartriprapancha, who flourished before Shankara, and commented on the Vedanta Sutra and the Upanishads.^[17]

Bhartriprapancha maintained that the self and the physical universe, though finite and imperfect, are real and the two are not altogether different from the Brahman. Bhartriprapancha was criticised by Shankara in his treatises. Scholars see Bhartriprapancha as one of the earlier philosophers in the line of philosophers who teach the tenet of Bhedabheda..^[17]

There was a long line of teachers of Vedanta before Shanka, the last among them being Mandan Mishra, who regarded Mimamsa and Vedanta as forming a single system and advocated the combination of action and knowledge known as Karma-Jnana-samuchchaya-vada. According to them, the sutras, beginning with the first sutra of Jaimini and ending with the last sutra of Badarayan Vyasa, form one compact shastra^[10]. The strict compartmentalization of Vedanta as different from the other orthodox Schools was the contribution of Shankara.

In his commentaries, Shankara mentions 99 different predecessors of his Sampradaya.Template:Sfn In the beginning of his commentary on the Brhadaranyaka Upanishad Shankara salutes the teachers of the Brahmavidya Sampradaya.^{[web 1]} The names of various important early Vedanta thinkers have been listed in the Siddhitraya by Yamunācārya (c. 1050), the Vedārthasamgraha by Rāmānuja (c. 1050–1157), and the Yatīndramatadīpikā by Śrīnivāsa-dāsa.Template:Sfn Combined together,Template:Sfn at least fourteen thinkers are known to have existed between the composition of the Brahman Sutras and Shankara's lifetime.Template:Sfn Template:Refn

Gaudapada and Shankara

Gaudapada wrote or compiledTemplate:Sfn the Māṇḍukya Kārikā, also known as the Gauḍapāda Kārikā and as the Āgama Śāstra.Template:Refn Gaudapda took over the Buddhist doctrines that ultimate reality is pure consciousness (vijñapti-mātra)Template:Sfn Gaudapada "wove [both doctrines] into a philosophy of the Mandukaya Upanisad, which was further developed by Shankara".Template:Sfn

Adi Shankara (788–820), elaborated on Gaudapada's work, and is considered to be the founder of Advaita Vedanta.Template:Sfn It was Shankara who succeeded in reading Gaudapada's mayavadaTemplate:Sfn Template:Refn into Badarayana's Brahma Sutras, "and give it a locus classicus",Template:Sfn against the realistic strain of the Brahma Sutras.Template:Sfn Template:Refn Template:Refn His interpretation, including works ascribed to him, has become the normative interpretation of Advaita Vedanta.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn

Although Shankara is often considered to be the founder of the Advaita Vedanta school, according to Nakamura, comparison of the known teachings of these early Vedantins and Shankara's thought shows that most of the characteristics of Shankara's thought "were advocated by someone before Śankara".Template:Sfn Shankara "was the person who synthesized the Advaita-vāda which had previously existed before him".Template:Sfn In this synthesis, he was the rejuvenator and defender of ancient learning.Template:Sfn He was an unequalled commentator,Template:Sfn due to whose efforts and contributions the Advaita Vedanta assumed a dominant position within Indian philosophy.Template:Sfn

Bhakti

Bhedabheda Vedanta schools played an important role in the rise of bhakti, such as Suddhadvaita, founded by Vallabha^[18] (1479–1531 CE), Achintya Bheda Abheda, founded by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (1486–1534)Template:Sfn and Vishishtadvaita founded by Shri Ramanuja (1017–1137 CE).

Integration of various schools

According to Nicholson, already between the 12th and the 16th century,

... certain thinkers began to treat as a single whole the diverse philosophical teachings of the Upanishads, epics, Puranas, and the schools known retrospectively as the "six systems" (saddarsana) of mainstream Hindu philosophy.Template:Sfn Template:Refn

Both the Indian and the European thinkers who developed the term "Hinduism" in the 19th century were influenced by these philosophersTemplate:Sfn especially Vijnanabhiksu, a Bhedabheda Vedantin.Template:Sfn Neo-Vedanta too was inspired by these thinkers.Template:Sfn

Vedanta philosophy

Basic questions

The schools of Vedānta seek to answer questions about the relation between atman and Brahman, and the relation between Brahman and the world.Template:Sfn

The schools of Vedanta are named after the relation they see between atman and Brahman:Template:Sfn

According to Advaita Vedanta, there is no difference.Template:Sfn
According to Dvaita the jīvātman is totally different from Brahman. Even though he is similar to brahman, he is not identical.
According to Vishishtadvaita, the jīvātman is a part of Brahman, and hence is similar, but not identical.
According to Shuddhadvaita, the jīvātman and Brahman are like sparks and fire, Jagat is real and the jīvātman is clouded by nescience (avidya) due to Maya.

Sivananda gives the following explanation:

Madhva said: "Man is the servant of God," and established his Dvaita philosophy. Ramanuja said: "Man is a ray or spark of God," and established his Visishtadvaita philosophy. Sankara said: "Man is identical with Brahman or the Eternal Soul," and established his Kevala Advaita philosophy.Template:Sfn

All schools of Vedanta subscribe to the theory of Satkāryavāda,^{[web 2]} which means that the effect is pre-existent in the cause. But there are two different views on the status of the "effect", that is, the world. Most schools of Vedanta,Template:Sfn^{[web 2]} as well as Samkhya,^{[web 2]} support Parinamavada, the idea that the world is a real transformation (parinama) of Brahman.Template:Sfn According to Nicholson, "the Brahma Sutras also espouse the realist Parinamavada position, which appears to have been the view most common among early Vedantins".Template:Sfn In contrast to Badarayana, Adi Shankara and Advaita Vedantists hold a different view, Vivartavada, which says that the effect, the world, is merely an unreal (vivarta) transformation of its cause, Brahman:

[A]lthough Brahman seems to undergo a transformation, in fact no real change takes place. The myriad of beings are essentially unreal, as the only real being is Brahman, that ultimate reality which is unborn, unchanging, and entirely without parts.Template:Sfn

Common features

Even though there are many sub-schools of vedantic philosophy, all these schools share some common features, that can be called the vedantic core:Template:Sfn

Brahman is the supreme cause of the entire universe and is all pervading and eternal, as found in the Prasthanatrayi—The Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras and the Bhagavad Gita.
Actions are subordinate to knowledge or devotion. Actions are useful only for preparing the mind for knowledge or devotion; and once this is achieved, selfish actions and their rewards must be renounced.
Bondage is subjection to Saṃsāra, the cycle of death and rebirth.
Liberation is deliverance from this cycle.

Traditional Vedānta considers scriptural evidence, or shabda pramāna, as the most authentic means of knowledge, while perception, or pratyaksa, and logical inference, or anumana, are considered to be subordinate (but valid).Template:Sfn Template:Sfn

Vedanta rejects ritual in favor of renunciation, which makes Vedanta irreconcileable with Mimamsa.Template:Sfn

Schools of Vedanta

Template:Subschools of Vedanta

The contents of the Upanishads are often couched in enigmatic language, which has left them open to various interpretations. Over a period of time, various schools of Vedanta, with different interpretations of the Upanishads and the Brahma Sutras arose. There are three,Template:Sfn four,Template:Sfn five^[18] or sixTemplate:Sfn Template:Refn which are prominent:

Bhedabheda, as early as the 7th century CE,^[19] or even the 4th centuryTemplate:Sfn
- Svabhavikabhedabheda or Dvaitādvaita, founded by Nimbarka^[18] in the 13th century
- Suddhadvaita, founded by Vallabha^[18] (1479–1531 CE)
- Achintya Bheda Abheda, founded by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (1486–1534)Template:Sfn
Advaita Vedanta, founded by Gaudapada and Shri Adi Shankara around 700 CE
Vishishtadvaita, also a subschool of bhedabheda, founded by Shri Ramanuja (1017–1137 CE)
Dvaita, founded by Shri Madhvacharya (1199–1278 CE)

Proponents of other Vedantic schools continue to write and develop their ideas as well, although their works are not widely known outside of smaller circles of followers in India.

Bhedabheda

Bhedabheda (bheda-abheda), which means "difference and non-difference",^[19] existed as early as the 7th century CE,^[19] but Bādarāyaṇa’s Brahma Sūtra (c. 4th century CE) may also have been written from a Bhedābheda Vedāntic viewpoint.^[19] According to the Bhedābheda Vedānta schools the individual self (jīvātman) is both different and not different from Brahman.^[19] Bhakti found a place in later proponents of this school.^[19] Major names of this school are Bhāskara (8th-9th century),^[19] Rāmānuja’s teacher Yādavaprakāśa,^[19] Nimbārka (13th century) who founded the Dvaitadvaita school,^[19] Vallabha (1479–1531)^[19] who founded Shuddhadvaita,^[18] Caitanya (1486–1534) who founded the Achintya Bheda Abheda school,^[19]Template:Sfn and Vijñānabhikṣu (16th century).^[19]

According to Nakamura and Dasgupta, the Brahmasutras reflect a Bhedabheda point of view,Template:Sfn the most influential school of Vedanta before Shankara.Template:Sfn Template:Refn

Dvaitādvaita

Dvaitādvaita was propounded by Nimbārka (13th century), based upon Bhedābheda, which was taught by Bhāskara. According to this school, the jīvātman is at once the same and yet different from Brahman. The jiva relation may be regarded as dvaita from one point of view and advaita from another. In this school, God is visualized as Krishna.^[20]

Shuddhādvaita

File:Shri mahaprabhuji.jpg

Vallabhacharya

Shuddhadvaita was propounded by Vallabhacharya (1479–1531 CE). This system also identifies Bhakti as the only means of liberation, 'to go to Goloka' (lit., the world of cows; the Sankrit word 'go', 'cow', also means 'star'), through "Pushtimarga" (the path of God's grace). The world is said to be the sport (līlā) of Krishna, who is Sat-Chit-Ananda or, "eternal bliss mind".^[20]On the basis of quadruple “Proof Corpus (pramāna catuṣṭaya) comprising Srutis and Smrutis, Brahmasutra, Gita and Shrimadbhagvata, Vallabhacharya propounded the philosophy of “shuddhadvaita brahmvaad (pure non-dualism), according to which Maya or the world (jagat) is not unreal (‘jagat mithya’) as in the Advaita of Shankar, but the entire universe is real and is subtly Brahman only. Brahman has created the world without connection with or help from any external agency such as Maya, which itself is his power. Brahman manifests Himself through the world. Srutis say Brahman or Ishvara desired to become many, and he became the multitude of individual souls and the world (jagat).^[21] That is how Vallabh’s shuddhadvaita is known as ‘Unmodified transformation’ or ‘Avikṛta Pariṇāmavāda’, while Shankar’s Advaita or Kevaladvaita is known as ‘Vivartavāda’. Vallabha recognises Brahman as the whole and the individual as a ‘part’. The individual soul (Jeeva or jeevatma) and God are in "essence" not different, like sparks and fire. The soul is both a ‘doer’ and ‘enjoyer’. It is atomic in size but it pervades the whole body through its essence of intelligence (like scent of sandalwood, even if it can't be seen). Vallabhacharya says that the Jiva is not Supreme, nor it is Sat-chit-ananda (Existence-knowledge-bliss Absolute) being clouded by the force of nescience (‘avidya’ or Maya ) and is therefore devoid of bliss (ananda).^[22]

Achintya-Bheda-Abheda

Founded by Chaitanya Mahaprabhu Template:Sfn (1486–1534). Achintya-Bheda-Abheda represents the philosophy of inconceivable one-ness and difference,Template:Sfn in relation to the power creation and creator, (Krishna), svayam bhagavan.Template:Sfn and also between God and his energiesTemplate:Sfn within the Gaudiya Vaishnava religious tradition. In Sanskrit achintya means 'inconceivable',Template:Sfn bheda translates as 'difference', and abheda translates as 'one-ness'. It can be best understood as integration of strict dualist (Dvaita) view of Madhvacharya and qualified monism Vishishtadvaita of Ramanujacharya while rejecting absolute monism Advaita of Adi Sankara.

Advaita Vedānta

File:Raja Ravi Varma - Sankaracharya.jpg

Shankaracharya

Advaita Vedanta (IAST Advaita Vedānta; Sanskrit: अद्वैत वेदान्त Template:IPA-sa) was propounded by Adi Shankara (early 8th century CE) and his grand-guru Gaudapada, who described Ajativada. It is a^[23]^[24]^[25] sub-school of the Vedānta (literally, end or the goal of the Vedas, Sanskrit) school of Hindu philosophy.^[26]

Vishishtadvaita

Vishishtadvaita was propounded by Rāmānuja (1017–1137 CE) and says that the jīvātman is a part of Brahman, and hence is similar, but not identical. The main difference from Advaita is that in Visishtadvaita, the Brahman is asserted to have attributes (Saguna brahman), including the individual conscious souls and matter. Brahman, matter and the individual souls are distinct but mutually inseparable entities. This school propounds Bhakti or devotion to God visualized as Vishnu to be the path to liberation. Māyā is seen as the creative power of God.^[20]Template:Refn

Dvaita

Dvaita was propounded by Madhwāchārya (1199–1278 CE). It is also referred to as tatvavādā - The Philosophy of Reality. It identifies God with Brahman completely, and in turn with Vishnu or his various incarnations like Krishna, Narasimha, Srinivāsa etc. In that sense it is also known as sat-vaishnava philosophy to differentiate from the Vishishtadvaita school known by sri-vaishnavism. It regards Brahman, all individual souls (jīvātmans) and matter as eternal and mutually separate entities. This school also advocates Bhakti as the route to sattvic liberation whereas hatred (Dvesha)-literally 'twoness') and indifference towards the Lord will lead to eternal hell and eternal bondage respectively. Liberation is the state of attaining maximum joy or sorrow, which is awarded to individual souls (at the end of their sādhana), based on the souls' inherent and natural disposition towards good or evil. The achintya-adbhuta shakti (the immeasurable power) of Lord Vishnu is seen as the efficient cause of the universe and the primordial matter or prakrti is the material cause. Dvaita also propounds that all action is performed by the Lord energizing every soul from within, awarding the results to the soul but Himself not affected in the least by the results.^[20]

Neo-Vedanta

Neo-Vedanta is a modern interpretation of Vedanta, with a liberal attitude toward the Vedas.Template:Sfn It reconciles dualism and non-dualism,Template:Sfn and rejects the "universal illusionism"Template:Sfn of Shankara, despite its reference for classical Advaita Vedanta:

Ramakrsna, Svami Vivekananda, and Aurobindo (I also include M.K. Gandhi) have been labeled "neo-Vedantists," a philosophy that rejects the Advaitins' claim that the world is illusory. Aurobindo, in his The Life Divine, declares that he has moved from Sankara's "universal illusionism" to his own "universal realism" (2005: 432), defined as metaphysical realism in the European philosophical sense of the term.Template:Sfn

Mohandas Gandhi endorsed the Jain concept of Anekantavada,Template:Sfn the notion that truth and reality are perceived differently from diverse points of view, and that no single point of view is the complete truth.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn This concept embraces the perspectives of both Vedānta which, according to Jainism, "recognizes substances but not process", and Buddhism, which "recognizes process but not substance". Jainism, on the other hand, pays equal attention to both substance (dravya) and process (paryaya).Template:Sfn

Neo-Vedanta developed in the 19th century, in interaction with and response to colonialism.Template:Sfn With the onset of the British Raj, the colonialisation of India by the British, there also started a Hindu renaissance in the 19th century, which profoundly changed the understanding of Hinduism in both India and the west.Template:Sfn Western orientalist searched for the "essence" of the Indian religions, discerning this in the Vedas,Template:Sfn and meanwhile creating the notion of "Hinduism" as a unified body of religious praxisTemplate:Sfn and the popular picture of 'mystical India'.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn

This idea of a Vedic essence was taken over by the Hindu reformers, together with the ideas of Universalism and Perennialism, the idea that all religions share a common mystic ground.Template:Sfn The Brahmo Samaj, who was supported for a while by the Unitarian Church,Template:Sfn played an essential role in the introduction and spread of this new understanding of Hinduism.Template:Sfn Vedanta came to be regarded as the essence of Hinduism, and Advaita Vedanta came to be regarded as "then paradigmatic example of the mystical nature of the Hindu religion".Template:Sfn

A major proponent in the popularisation of this Universalist and Perennialist interpretation of Advaita Vedanta was Vivekananda,Template:Sfn who played a major role in the revival of Hinduism,Template:Sfn and the spread of Advaita Vedanta to the west via the Vedanta Society, the international arm of Ramakrishna Order. His interpretation of Advaita Vedanta has been called "Neo-Vedanta".Template:Sfn The popular understanding of Hinduism has been dominated by this neo-Vedanta,Template:Sfn Template:Refn in which mysticism,Template:Sfn Aryan origins and the unity of HinduismTemplate:Sfn have been emphasised.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn

These notions also served well for the Hindu nationalists, who further popularised this notion of Advaita Vedanta as the pinnacle of Indian religions.Template:Sfn It "provided an opportunity for the construction of a nationalist ideology that could unite Hindus in their struggle against colonial oppression".Template:Sfn

Influence

The Vedanta school has had a historic and central influence on Hinduism, states Nakamura:^[6]

The prevalence of Vedanta thought is found not only in philosophical writings but also in various forms of (Hindu) literature, such as the epics, lyric poetry, drama and so forth. What is especially worthy of attention is that the Hindu religious sects, the common faith of the Indian populace, looked to Vedanta philosophy for the theoretical foundations for their theology. The influence of Vedanta is prominent in the sacred literatures of Hinduism, such as the various Puranas, Samhitas, Agamas and Tantras. Many commentaries on the fundamental scripture of Vedanta, the Brahmasutra, were written by the founders or leading scholars of the various sects of Hinduism, and they are transmitted to this day as documents indispensable in the respective sectarian traditions. The majority of the traditional and conservative scholars in India today, called Pandits, are students of Vedanta, and an overwhelming number belong to the lineage of Shankara – five-sixths of all Pandits, according to some authorities.

— Hajime Nakamura (2004), A History of Early Vedānta Philosophy, Volume 2^[6]

Frithjof Schuon summarizes the influence of Vedanta on Hinduism as, "The Vedanta contained in the Upanishads, then formulated in the Brahma Sutra, and finally commented and explained by Shankara, is an invaluable key for discovering the deepest meaning of all the religious doctrines and for realizing that the Sanatana Dharma secretly penetrates all the forms of traditional spirituality.^[27]^[28] Gavin Flood states, "the most influential school of theology in India has been Vedanta, exerting enormous influence on all religious traditions and becoming the central ideology of the Hindu renaissance in the nineteenth century. It has become the philosophical paradigm of Hinduism par excellence."^[7]

Lucian Blaga has often used the concepts Marele Anonim (‘the Great Anonymous’) and cenzura transcendentă (‘the transcendental censorship’) in his philosophy. He was influenced by Śaṅkara’s concepts of Brahman (‘God’) and māyā (‘illusion’).^[29] In Śaṅkarācārya, Brahman is understood as nirguna Brahman (‘God without attributes’), whilst Īśvara is saguna Brahman (God with attributes). Louis Renou underlines that Brahman is superior to Īśvara, while Olivier Lacombe writes that Brahman is Īśvara’s superlative.^[30] Brahman is different than Greek Zeus, as well as than Christian or Jewish God, than Muslim Allah, because he is transpersonal.^[31] Māyā is a fundamental concept in Vedanta. It has several meanings and it has often been translated as ‘illusion’. According to L. Thomas O’Neil, māyā signifies ‘measuring the immeasurable’.^[32]

Comparison to Western philosophies

Similarities between Vedanta and Western philosophical traditions have been discussed by many authorities. Due to the colonisation of Asia by the western world, since the late 18th century an exchange of ideas has been taking place between the western world and Asia, which also influenced western religiosity.Template:Sfn In 1785 appeared the first western translation of a Sanskrit-text.Template:Sfn It marked the growing interest in the Indian culture and languages.Template:Sfn The first translation of Upanishads appeared in two parts in 1801 and 1802,Template:Sfn which influenced Arthur Schopenhauer, who called them "the consolation of my life".Template:Sfn Template:Refn Schopenhauer drew explicit parallels between his philosophy, as set out in 'The World as Will and Representation',^[33] and that of the Vedanta philosophy ascribed to Vasya in the work of Sir William Jones.^[34] Early translations also appeared in other European languages.Template:Sfn

In the 20th century, comparisons between Advaita, western philosophy, and science took a high flight. Brian David Josephson, Welsh physicist, and Nobel Prize laureate says:^[35]

The Vedanta and the Sankhya hold the key to the laws of the mind and thought process which are co-related to the Quantum Field, i.e. the operation and distribution of particles at atomic and molecular levels.

Spinoza

Max Müller, in his lectures, noted the striking similarities between Vedanta and the system of Spinoza, saying

[T]he Brahman, as conceived in the Upanishads and defined by Sankara, is clearly the same as Spinoza's 'Substantia'."^[36]

Helena Blavatsky, a founder of the Theosophical Society, also compared Spinoza's religious thought to Vedanta, writing in an unfinished essay

As to Spinoza’s Deity—natura naturans—conceived in his attributes simply and alone; and the same Deity—as natura naturata or as conceived in the endless series of modifications or correlations, the direct outflowing results from the properties of these attributes, it is the Vedantic Deity pure and simple.^[37]

The 19th-century German Sanskritist Theodore Goldstücker was one of the early figures to notice the similarities between the religious conceptions of the Vedanta and those of the Dutch Jewish philosopher Baruch Spinoza, writing that Spinoza's thought was

... so exact a representation of the ideas of the Vedanta, that we might have suspected its founder to have borrowed the fundamental principles of his system from the Hindus, did his biography not satisfy us that he was wholly unacquainted with their doctrines [...] comparing the fundamental ideas of both we should have no difficulty in proving that, had Spinoza been a Hindu, his system would in all probability mark a last phase of the Vedanta philosophy.^[38]^[39]

Notes

References

↑ ^1.0 ^1.1 Satischandra Chatterjee, Dhirendramohan Dutta (2007). AN INTRODUCTION TO INDIAN PHILOSOPHY. RUPA PUBLICATIONS INDIA PVT. LIMITED. p. 317. ISBN 978-81-291-1195-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
↑ NV Isaeva (1992), Shankara and Indian Philosophy, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0-7914-1281-7, page 35 with footnote 30
↑ Jeaneane D Fowler (2012), The Bhagavad Gita, Sussex University Press, ISBN 978-1845193461, pages xxiii-xxiv
↑ Knut Jacobsen (2008), Theory and Practice of Yoga, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120832329, pages 20-21
↑ Francis X Clooney (2000), Ultimate Realities: A Volume in the Comparative Religious Ideas Project, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791447758, pages 96-107
↑ ^6.0 ^6.1 ^6.2 Hajime Nakamura (2004), A History of Early Vedānta Philosophy, Part 2, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120819634, page 3
↑ ^7.0 ^7.1 Gavin Flood (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0521438780, page 238
↑ Hiriyanna, M. (2008). The Essentials of Indian Philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. p. 19. ISBN 978-81-208-1330-4.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
↑ Satischandra Chatterjee, Dhirendramohan Dutta (2007). AN INTRODUCTION TO INDIAN PHILOSOPHY. Rupa Publications India Pvt. Limited. pp. 317, 318. ISBN 978-81-291-1195-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
↑ ^10.0 ^10.1 Sharma, Chandradhar (2009). A Critical Summary of Indian Philosphy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. p. 211. ISBN 978-81-208-0365-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
↑ Vepa, Kosla. The Dhaarmik Traditions. Indic Studies Foundation.
↑ Dasgupta, Surendranath (2015). A History of Indian Philosophy, Vol. 1. Motilal Banarasidas Publishers Pvt. Ltd. p. 28. ISBN 978-81-208-0412-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
↑ ^13.0 ^13.1 ^13.2 Hiriyanna, M. (2008). The Essentials of Indian Philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. pp. 151, 152. ISBN 978-81-208-1330-4.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
↑ Pasricha, Ashu (2008). Encyclopaedia of Eminent Thinkers: The Political Thought of C. Rajagopalachari, Volume 15. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company. p. 95. ISBN 9788180694950.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
↑ The seven great untenables: Sapta-vidhā anupapatti. By John A Grimes. Introduction, p.7. Motilal Banarsidass 1990
↑ Sharma, Chandramohan (2009). A Critical Summary of Indian Philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. pp. 239, 240, 241. ISBN 978-81-208-0365-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
↑ ^17.0 ^17.1 Hiriyanna, M. (2008). The Essentials of Indian Philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Pvt. Ltd. pp. 152, 23. ISBN 978-81-208-1330-4.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
↑ ^18.0 ^18.1 ^18.2 ^18.3 ^18.4 Prem Pahlajrai, Asian Languages and Literature, University of Washington, Vedanta: A Comparative Analysis of Diverse Schools
↑ ^19.00 ^19.01 ^19.02 ^19.03 ^19.04 ^19.05 ^19.06 ^19.07 ^19.08 ^19.09 ^19.10 ^19.11 Internet Encyclopedy of Philosophy, Bhedābheda Vedānta
↑ ^20.0 ^20.1 ^20.2 ^20.3 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Vedanta
↑ Devarshi Ramanath Shastri, “Shuddhadvaita Darshan (Vol.2), Published by Mota Mandir, Bhoiwada, Mumbai, India, 1917.
↑ “Brahmavād Saṅgraha, Pub. Vaishnava Mitra Mandal Sarvajanik Nyasa, Indore, India, 2014.
↑ "Consciousness in Advaita Vedānta" By William M. Indich, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, 1995, ISBN 978-81-208-1251-2.
↑ "Gandhi And Mahayana Buddhism". Class.uidaho.edu. Retrieved 2011-06-10.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
↑ "The Experience of Hinduism: essays on religion in Maharashtra," By Eleanor Zelliot, Maxine Berntsen, State University of New York Press, 1980, ISBN 0-8248-0271-3.
↑ "Advaita Vedanta: A Philosophical Reconstruction," By Eliot Deutsch, University of Hawaii Press, 1988, ISBN 0-88706-662-3
↑ F Schuon (1975), One of the Great Lights of the World, in Spiritual Perspectives, Essays in Mysticism and Metaphysics (Editor: TMP Mahadevan), Arnold Heineman, ISBN , page 91
↑ Klaus Witz (1998), The Supreme Wisdom of the Upaniṣads: An Introduction, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120815735, page 11
↑ Iţu, Mircia (2007), Marele Anonim şi cenzura transcendentă la Blaga. Brahman şi māyā la Śaṅkara (‘The Great Anonymous and the transcendental censorship in Lucian Blaga. Brahman and māyā in Adi Shankara’), in Caiete critice 6-7 (236-237), Bucarest, pages 75-83. Template:ISSN.
↑ Lacombe, Olivier (1979), Indianité. Etudes historiques et comparatives sur la pensée indienne, Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
↑ Iţu, Mircia (2004), Filosofia şi religiile Indiei (‘Indian Philosophy and Indian Religions’), Braşov: Orientul latin, page. 69 ISBN 973-9338-70-4
↑ O’Neil, Thomas L. (1980), Māyā in Śaṅkara. Measuring the Immeasurable, New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, page 140.
↑ Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation. Translated from the German by EFJ Payne. Dover Publications, vol. 1, chap. 1
↑ Jones, Sir William. On the Philosophy of the Asiatics. Sir William Jones. Asiatic Researches, vol. 4, p. 164
↑ "Synthesis of Science and Spirituality"
↑ Three Lectures on the Vedanta Philosophy. F. Max Muller. Kessinger Publishing, 2003. p123
↑ H.P Blavatsky's Collected Writings, Volume 13, pages 308-310. Quest Books
↑ Literary Remains of the Late Professor Theodore Goldstucker, W. H. Allen, 1879. p32.
↑ The Westminster Review, Volumes 78-79, Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, 1862. p1862

Sources

Published sources

2

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

Web-sources