Difference between revisions of "Shastra Rachana Paddhati (शास्त्ररचनापद्धतिः)"
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Apart from them Chakrapanidatta, Arunadatta, Indu were authors of commentaries which have methodology of importance. | Apart from them Chakrapanidatta, Arunadatta, Indu were authors of commentaries which have methodology of importance. | ||
− | == | + | == Methodology of Ancient Shastras == |
All these works, belonging to divergent disciplines, portray the depth of Indian thinkers, who looked at the scientific treatises from all possible angles, critically examined the various conceptual aspects of the scientific works along without neglecting the subtle aspects. As such these concepts can be understood by illustrations from poetics also. The lesser known fact is that these great Indian thinkers after a thorough research, in-depth comprehensive study of the shastras available to them, formulated a methodology for building scientific theories having 95 constituents, under five headings.<ref name=":0">W. K. Lele (2006) ''Methodology of Ancient Indian Sciences'' Varanasi : Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan</ref><ref name=":1" /> | All these works, belonging to divergent disciplines, portray the depth of Indian thinkers, who looked at the scientific treatises from all possible angles, critically examined the various conceptual aspects of the scientific works along without neglecting the subtle aspects. As such these concepts can be understood by illustrations from poetics also. The lesser known fact is that these great Indian thinkers after a thorough research, in-depth comprehensive study of the shastras available to them, formulated a methodology for building scientific theories having 95 constituents, under five headings.<ref name=":0">W. K. Lele (2006) ''Methodology of Ancient Indian Sciences'' Varanasi : Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan</ref><ref name=":1" /> | ||
#तन्त्रयुक्तयः (tantrayuktayaḥ) ॥ Tantrayuktis (36) | #तन्त्रयुक्तयः (tantrayuktayaḥ) ॥ Tantrayuktis (36) |
Revision as of 23:11, 2 October 2018
Shastra rachanapaddhati (Samskrit : शास्त्ररचनापद्धतिः) means the methodology of composition of shastras. Samskrit literature abounds with hundreds of treatises pertaining to ancient Bharatiya Vijnana shastras of which more than half a dozen books provide us the detailed information outlining the devices or means for composition of a scientific or methodical structure of a shastra. Every Bharatiya shastra, irrespective of its subject matter, has been built using these principles of methodology, of which the teachers, students, and the critics who expounded theoretical works on those subjects, were required to be familiar with.
परिचयः|| Introduction
Our ancient intellectuals had not only produced numerous shastras or monumental treatises on almost all branches of ज्ञान and विज्ञान (Knowledge and Science) but also envisaged a detailed and comprehensive methodology of composing theoretico-scientific treatises. While there exist a few differences in the methodology of composition of shastras and the modern day research dissertations, journal and paper presentations all kinds of scientific writings essentially have the same requisites, as recognized by scholars and researchers all over the world. In the Bharatavarsha, such intellectual efforts were known prior to Panini's composition of Ashtadhyayi, a highly evolved exposition. Many thinkers put in their efforts in enriching and refining the methodology, creating a number of devices relating to words, structures and meanings pertaining to the composition of a shastra described in their authoritative and famous texts as given below,
- Vishnudharmottara Purana, contains discussions on sundry topics like poetics, arts, sculpture
- Panini Maharshi's Ashtadhyayi, a world famous grammar treatise
- Kautilya's Arthashastra, a work on polity and statecraft
- Charaka Samhita, greatest extant work on Ayurveda
- Sushruta Samhita, a renowned work on surgery
- Vagbhata's Ashtangasangraha and Ashtangahrdayam, books on Ayurveda
- Nilamegha's Tantrayuktivichara, a medical treatise
Apart from them Chakrapanidatta, Arunadatta, Indu were authors of commentaries which have methodology of importance.
Methodology of Ancient Shastras
All these works, belonging to divergent disciplines, portray the depth of Indian thinkers, who looked at the scientific treatises from all possible angles, critically examined the various conceptual aspects of the scientific works along without neglecting the subtle aspects. As such these concepts can be understood by illustrations from poetics also. The lesser known fact is that these great Indian thinkers after a thorough research, in-depth comprehensive study of the shastras available to them, formulated a methodology for building scientific theories having 95 constituents, under five headings.[1][2]
- तन्त्रयुक्तयः (tantrayuktayaḥ) ॥ Tantrayuktis (36)
- व्याख्यानि (vyākhyāni) ॥ Vyakhyas (15)
- कल्पनाः (kalpanāḥ) ॥ Kalpanas (7)
- आश्रयानि (āśrayāni)॥ Ashrayas (20)
- ताच्छील्यानि (tācchīlyāni)॥ Taatchilyas (17)
A brief introduction of each of the five given elements of composition and presentation of shastras will be undertaken in this topic.
तन्त्रयुक्तिः॥Tantrayukti
Tantrayukti (तन्त्रयुक्तिः), an uncommonly used word, refers to the methodical elements and devices (Yuktis) of Tantra (theory) that are involved into making of a theory, the structural aspects as well as the interpretation. There are about 36 such generally accepted tantrayuktis, though different texts propose a varying numbers of such yuktis ranging between 32 to 41.[1][2] According to Vishnudharmottara purana the following list of 32 Tantrayuktis are given
- अधिकरणम् ॥ adhikaraṇam
- योगः ॥ yogaḥ
- पदार्थः ॥ padārthaḥ
- हेत्वर्थः ॥ hetvarthaḥ
- उद्धेशः ॥ uddheśaḥ
- निर्देशः ॥ nirdeśaḥ
- उपदेशः ॥ upadeśaḥ
- अपदेशः ॥ apadeśaḥ
- प्रदेशः ॥ pradeśaḥ
- अतिदेशः ॥ atideśaḥ
- अपवर्गः ॥ apavargaḥ
- वाक्यशेषः ॥ vākyaśeṣaḥ
- अर्थापत्तिः ॥ arthāpattiḥ
- प्रसङ्गः ॥ prasaṅgaḥ
- एकान्तः ॥ ekāntaḥ
- अनैकान्तः ॥ anaikāntaḥ
- पूर्वपक्षः ॥ pūrvapakṣaḥ
- निर्णयः ॥ nirṇayaḥ
- विधानम् ॥ vidhānam
- विपर्ययः ॥ viparyayaḥ
- अतिक्रान्तावेक्षणम् ॥ atikrāntāvekṣaṇam
- अनागतावेक्षणम् ॥ anāgatāvekṣaṇam
- संशयः ॥ saṁśayaḥ
- अतिव्याख्यानम् ॥ ativyākhyānam
- अनुमतम् ॥ anumatam
- स्वसंज्ञा ॥ svasaṁjñā
- निर्वचनम् ॥ nirvacanam
- दृष्टान्तः ॥ dr̥ṣṭāntaḥ
- नियोगः ॥ niyogaḥ
- विकल्पः ॥ vikalpaḥ
- समुच्चयः ॥ samuccayaḥ
- ऊह्यम् ॥ ūhyam
Again a word of wide import, Tantra used as a synonym for Shastra (in this context means theory) is that which holds the various aspects of a subject, into which are interwoven different thoughts, objectives, observations and proposals covering the vast expanse of the subject.
While almost all the above mentioned texts discussed tantrayukti, Arunadatta, the commentator of Vagbhata's Ashtangahrdayam, has dealt with explanation for a large number of devices other than the tantrayuktis.
व्याख्या ॥ Vyakhya
Vyakhya has been defined as विवरणात्मकशब्दसमूहरूपोग्रन्थविशेषः। meaning a particular composition explanatory in nature. Arunadatta in his Sarvanga Sundara commentary for Ashtangahrdayam explains thus
व्याख्या अपि तन्त्रस्य गुणः। ताभिरपि तन्त्रमलङि्क्रयते । ताश्च पञ्चदश प्रकारा ।
Meaning: An explanation (or exposition or commentary) is also an attribute (a desirable property) of a scientific composition. There are 15 types of Vyakhyas which are
- पिण्डव्यख्या ॥ piṇḍavyakhyā
- पदव्यख्या ॥ padavyakhyā
- पदार्थव्यख्या ॥ padārthavyakhyā
- अधिकरणव्यख्या ॥ adhikaraṇavyakhyā
- प्रकरणव्यख्या ॥ prakaraṇavyakhyā
- अर्थव्यख्या ॥ arthavyakhyā
- कृच्छ्रव्यख्या ॥ kr̥cchravyakhyā
- फलव्यख्या ॥ phalavyakhyā
- उच्चितकव्यख्या ॥ uccitakavyakhyā
- न्यासव्यख्या ॥ nyāsavyakhyā
- प्रयोजनव्यख्या ॥ prayojanavyakhyā
- अनुलोमव्यख्या ॥ anulomavyakhyā
- प्रतिलोमव्यख्या ॥ pratilomavyakhyā
- अतिसूत्रव्यख्या ॥ atisūtravyakhyā
- समस्तव्यख्या ॥ samastavyakhyā
कल्पना ॥ Kalpana
Kalpana (कल्पना) means the use of a word in a secondary sense. There are seven kinds of Kalpanas, Arunadatta's explanatory text is
तत्र प्रधानकल्पना द्विधा प्रधानस्य कल्पना प्रधानेन वा कल्पना प्रधानकल्पना ।
- प्रधानकल्पना ॥ pradhānakalpanā - is of two kinds प्रधानस्य कल्पना and प्रधानेन कल्पना
- गुणकल्पना ॥ guṇakalpanā
- भक्ष्यकल्पना ॥ bhakṣyakalpanā
- लेशकल्पना ॥ leśakalpanā
- विद्याकल्पना ॥ vidyākalpanā
- आज्ञाकल्पना ॥ ājñākalpanā
आश्रयम् ॥ Ashraya
An ashraya (आश्रयम् ) is a prop used to arrive at the correct meaning of the text. Arunadatta described 20 kinds of Ashrayas
- आदिलोपः ॥ ādilopaḥ
- मध्यलोपः ॥ madhyalopaḥ
- अन्तलोपः ॥ antalopaḥ
- उभयपदलोपः ॥ ubhayapadalopaḥ
- आदिमध्यान्तलोपः ॥ ādimadhyāntalopaḥ
- वर्णोपजननम् ॥ varṇopajananam
- ऋषिक्लिष्टम् ॥ r̥ṣikliṣṭam
- तन्त्रशीलम् ॥ tantraśīlam
- तन्त्रसंज्ञा ॥ tantrasaṁjñā
- प्राकृतम् ॥ prākr̥tam
- समानतन्त्रप्रत्ययः ॥ samānatantrapratyayaḥ
- परतन्त्रप्रत्ययः ॥ paratantrapratyayaḥ
- हेतुहेतुकधर्मः ॥ hetuhetukadharmaḥ
- कार्यकारणधर्मः ॥ kāryakāraṇadharmaḥ
- आद्यन्तविपर्ययः ॥ ādyantaviparyayaḥ
- शब्दान्तरम् ॥ śabdāntaram
- प्रत्ययः ॥ pratyayaḥ
- उपनयः ॥ upanayaḥ
- सम्भवः ॥ sambhavaḥ
- विभवः ॥ vibhavaḥ
ताच्छील्यम् ॥ Tatchilya
Tatchilya is an informal use of a word in a scientific composition. Arunadatta describes 17 kinds of Tatchilyas
सप्तदश ताच्छील्यादीनीत्युक्तम् ।
- ताच्छील्यम् ॥ tācchīlyam
- अवयवः ॥ avayavaḥ
- विकारः॥ vikāraḥ
- सामीप्यम्॥ sāmīpyam
- भूयस्त्वम्॥ bhūyastvam
- प्रकारः॥ prakāraḥ
- गुणिगुणविभवः ॥ guṇiguṇavibhavaḥ
- संसक्ता ॥ saṁsaktā
- तद्धर्मता ॥ taddharmatā
- स्थानम् ॥ sthānam
- तादर्थ्यम् ॥ tādarthyam
- साहचर्यम् ॥ sāhacaryam
- कर्म ॥ karma
- गुणनिमित्तता ॥ guṇanimittatā
- चेष्टानिमित्तता ॥ ceṣṭānimittatā
- मूलसंज्ञा ॥ mūlasaṁjñā
- तात्स्थ्यम् ॥ tātsthyam
Methodology of Modern Scientific Treatises
Modern technological advancements are bringing in various investigative procedures for verification of processes through experimental procedures. Standards and control checks are in place to ensure test results and reproducibility of any experiment is of great importance. Following a strict protocols adhering to standard operating procedures in any industry has led to widespread standardization of products obtained. Reason is no longer sufficient and gone are the days of trial and error experimentation, every aspect of science now sustains on verifiability and experimental testing of knowledge. [2]