Non-translatability (अननुवाद्यता) - Revision history

Fordharma: edited content

2021-12-20T09:26:54Z

edited content

Ckanak93 at 06:16, 20 December 2021

2021-12-20T06:16:13Z

Pṛthvī: Text replacement - "idol" to "murti or vigraha"

2020-03-12T16:47:37Z

Text replacement - "idol" to "murti or vigraha"

Fordharma: added Brahman not equal to God concept

2019-09-22T12:08:35Z

added Brahman not equal to God concept

Pṛthvī: Dr KSN video added

2019-09-17T09:32:59Z

Dr KSN video added

Fordharma at 06:32, 4 February 2019

2019-02-04T06:32:17Z

P16459: P16459 moved page Non-translatability (अनुवाद-अनीयता) to Non-translatability (अननुवाद्यता) without leaving a redirect: Title correction

2019-01-08T10:14:15Z

P16459 moved page Non-translatability (अनुवाद-अनीयता) to Non-translatability (अननुवाद्यता) without leaving a redirect: Title correction

Fordharma at 11:48, 1 January 2019

2019-01-01T11:48:52Z

Fordharma at 10:39, 31 December 2018

2018-12-31T10:39:28Z

Fordharma: /* Shabda and Shabdartha */

2018-12-31T10:36:23Z

Shabda and Shabdartha

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 |description=Non-translatability of Samskrit words
 }}
-Non-translatability (Samskrit : अननुवाद्यता) of the Samskrit words is emphasized in articles on [[Dharmawiki (धर्मविकि)|Dharmawiki]]. Many translations have taken place during the colonial era which have been passed on to us, the present day generation. Many conceptual words of esoteric meaning have been integrated in the daily lives of people following [[Sanatana Dharma (सनातनधर्मः)|Sanatana Dharma]] and as such words do not convey the comprehensive meaning of the original samskrit word.
+Non-translatability (Samskrit : अननुवाद्यता) of Samskrit words is an aspect which is emphasized while compiling articles on [[Dharmawiki (धर्मविकि)|Dharmawiki]]. Many translations took place during the colonial era. They have been passed on to us, the present day generation. Conceptual words coined and used in Sanatana Dharma texts have embedded esoteric meaning. They are used in specific context, entwined and integrated in the daily lives of people following [[Sanatana Dharma (सनातनधर्मः)|Sanatana Dharma]]. As such the translated words do not convey the comprehensive meaning of the original samskrit word. Hence Dharmawiki is committed to follow the concepts and words "as is" from the primary sources (Vedas and other texts). It is to be clearly noted that the translation of a word when used is to give a general understanding of the word in modern parlance and is not an endorsement to use a translated word in place of the original term. Hence "Atman" may be loosely translated as "Soul", but not an accepted term in its place.
-Shabdas (Words) are not simply sounds. They are concepts. They are visions. Unless you have an identical vision in some other language, translation becomes burden. Whitehead, eminent Harvard Mathematician and Philosopher said "''All lexicographers are murderers''".
+Shabdas (Words) are not simply sounds. They are concepts. They are visions. Unless there is an identical vision in some other language, translation becomes a burden. Whitehead, eminent Harvard Mathematician and Philosopher said "''All lexicographers are murderers''".
-So samskrit words cannot be translated. No doubt, when an Upanishadic text is taught to a student, the text itself does not mean anything. The preceptor has to drive it to the core of the disciple. He does it through Anuvada (अनुवादः), the original is a concept, not merely translated; but interpreted, annotated, and expanded with many anecdotes until the disciple "digests" the concept and the exact nuances of the word. Thus, Anuvada is perpetual and eternal.
+So samskrit words cannot be translated. No doubt, when an Upanishadic text is taught to a student, the text itself does not mean anything. The preceptor has to drive it into the core of the disciple. He does it through Anuvada (अनुवादः), the original is a concept, not merely translated; but interpreted, annotated, and expanded with many anecdotes until the disciple "digests" the concept and the exact nuances of the word. Thus, Anuvada is perpetual and eternal.
-Any translation be it English or Persian (say of Dara Shikho) or the many native Bharatiya languages today tend to project a wrong orientation of the original concepts, not deliberately, but primarily because each language has its set of nuances. Although it is said that many Bharatiya languages arose from Samskrit, certain sets of words and thus concepts digressed from what was presented and intended in the mulam (primary source).
+Any translation be it English or Persian (say of Dara Shikho) or the many native Bharatiya languages today tend to project a wrong orientation of the original concepts, not deliberately, but primarily because each language has its set of nuances. Although it is said that many Bharatiya languages arose from Samskrit, certain set of words and thus concepts digressed from what was presented and intended in the mulam (primary source).
 == Shabda and Shabdartha ==
-A shabda (interpreted as a ''word'' as well as ''sound'') has a ''mukhya pravrutti'' (the main purport) according to the Vaiyyakaranas (grammarians) it is the original intended meaning. The English word 'iridescence' means a lustrous rainbowlike play of color caused by differential refraction of light waves (as from an oil slick, soap bubble, or fish scales) that tends to change as the angle of view changes<ref>[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/iridescence Iridescence]</ref>. Similarly, the sun in the sky has an aura of light around him. One cannot divest him from that aura.
+A shabda (interpreted as a ''word'' as well as ''sound'') has a ''mukhya pravrutti'' (the main purport). According to the Vaiyyakaranas (grammarians) it is the original intended meaning. The English word 'iridescence' means a lustrous rainbowlike play of color caused by differential refraction of light waves (as from an oil slick, soap bubble, or fish scales) that tends to change as the angle of view changes<ref>[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/iridescence Iridescence]</ref>. Similarly, the sun in the sky has an aura of light around him. One cannot divest him from that aura.
-When a word is used, it has its own circle of meaning, light of meaning and that meaning is to be grasped especially for words like [[Dharma (धर्मः)|dharma]] and [[Moksha (मोक्षः)|moksha]]. The word Moksha occurs once in the Shvetashvatara upanishad.<blockquote>तं ह देवमात्मबुद्धिप्रकाशं मुमुक्षुर्वै शरणमहं प्रपद्ये ॥ १८ ॥ (Shve. Upan. 6.18) <ref>Shvetasvatara Upanishad ([https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D/%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A0%E0%A4%83_%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%A7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%83 Adhyaya 6])</ref></blockquote>Mumukshuh is the desire to be liberated from miseries, liberated from bondage, liberated from poverty of thought and expression but the real greater concept into which moksha would fit is amrutattva  praptih (again loosely translated as ''immortality'')''.''<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya</ref>
+When a word is used in Samskrit, it has its own sphere of meaning (context in which it is used), a light of meaning (the associated informative aspects) and that meaning is to be grasped. Words like [[Dharma (धर्मः)|dharma]] and [[Moksha (मोक्षः)|moksha]] have a wide sphere of application and throw light on different aspects associated with a particular context. The word Moksha occurs once in the Shvetashvatara upanishad.<blockquote>तं ह देवमात्मबुद्धिप्रकाशं मुमुक्षुर्वै शरणमहं प्रपद्ये ॥ १८ ॥ (Shve. Upan. 6.18) <ref>Shvetasvatara Upanishad ([https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D/%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A0%E0%A4%83_%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%A7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%83 Adhyaya 6])</ref></blockquote>Mumukshutva is that desire to be free from miseries, from bondage, from poverty of thought and expression. But the real greater concept of moksha refers to amrutattva  praptih (again loosely translated as ''immortality'')''.'' It's primary meaning refers to freeing Self from cyclic karma and to know its eternal characteristic.<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya</ref>
-Thus we see in one example how Moksha, cannot be translated as Liberation, Free from bondage, Emancipation, Salvation etc. None of these words can equate to or describe the concept of "Amrtattva Prapti".
+Thus we see in one example how Moksha, cannot be translated as liberation, freedom from bondage, emancipation (of the Soul), Salvation etc. None of these words can equate to or describe the concept of "Amrtattva Prapti".
 Brahman is one significant concept which has been misunderstood by modern Indic interpreters who have translated IT as God. Definition of God as per English dictionary is a moral authority, a supreme being, as an image, murti or vigraha, animal or other object worshipped as divine, or symbolizing God. Conversely upanishadic definition of Brahman is a supreme existence or absolute reality. The concept of "Lord" indoctrinated into the Bharatiya system of thought processes are based on the abrahmic concept of God which is finite whereas the Brahmatattva of the deities is Infiniteness, hence God or Lord cannot be equal to Brahman. (Citation : Little Yogi in the modern city by Govinda Das)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 |description=Non-translatability of Samskrit words
 }}
-Non-translatability (Samskrit : अननुवाद्यता) of the Samskrit words is emphasized in articles on [[Dharmawiki (धर्मविकि)|Dharmawiki]]. Many translations have taken place during the colonial era which have been passed on to us, the present day generation. Many conceptual words of esoteric meaning have integrated in the daily lives of people following [[Sanatana Dharma (सनातनधर्मः)|Sanatana Dharma]] and as such words do not convey the comprehensive meaning of the original samskrit word.
+Non-translatability (Samskrit : अननुवाद्यता) of the Samskrit words is emphasized in articles on [[Dharmawiki (धर्मविकि)|Dharmawiki]]. Many translations have taken place during the colonial era which have been passed on to us, the present day generation. Many conceptual words of esoteric meaning have been integrated in the daily lives of people following [[Sanatana Dharma (सनातनधर्मः)|Sanatana Dharma]] and as such words do not convey the comprehensive meaning of the original samskrit word.
 Shabdas (Words) are not simply sounds. They are concepts. They are visions. Unless you have an identical vision in some other language, translation becomes burden. Whitehead, eminent Harvard Mathematician and Philosopher said "''All lexicographers are murderers''".
-So samskrit words cannot be translated. No doubt, when an Upanishadic text is taught to a student, the text itself does not mean anything. The preceptor has to drive it to the core of the disciple. He does it through Anuvada (अनुवादः), the original is a concept, not merely translated; but interpreted, annotated, and expanded with many anecdotes until the disciple "digests" the concept and the exact nuances of the word. Thus Anuvada is perpetual and eternal.
+So samskrit words cannot be translated. No doubt, when an Upanishadic text is taught to a student, the text itself does not mean anything. The preceptor has to drive it to the core of the disciple. He does it through Anuvada (अनुवादः), the original is a concept, not merely translated; but interpreted, annotated, and expanded with many anecdotes until the disciple "digests" the concept and the exact nuances of the word. Thus, Anuvada is perpetual and eternal.
 Any translation be it English or Persian (say of Dara Shikho) or the many native Bharatiya languages today tend to project a wrong orientation of the original concepts, not deliberately, but primarily because each language has its set of nuances. Although it is said that many Bharatiya languages arose from Samskrit, certain sets of words and thus concepts digressed from what was presented and intended in the mulam (primary source).
@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 A shabda (interpreted as a ''word'' as well as ''sound'') has a ''mukhya pravrutti'' (the main purport) according to the Vaiyyakaranas (grammarians) it is the original intended meaning. The English word 'iridescence' means a lustrous rainbowlike play of color caused by differential refraction of light waves (as from an oil slick, soap bubble, or fish scales) that tends to change as the angle of view changes<ref>[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/iridescence Iridescence]</ref>. Similarly, the sun in the sky has an aura of light around him. One cannot divest him from that aura.
-When a word is used, it has its own circle of meaning, light of meaning and that meaning is to be grasped especially for words like dharma and moksha. The word Moksha occurs once in the Shvetashvatara upanishad.<blockquote>तं ह देवमात्मबुद्धिप्रकाशं मुमुक्षुर्वै शरणमहं प्रपद्ये ॥ १८ ॥ (Shve. Upan. 6.18) <ref>Shvetasvatara Upanishad ([https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D/%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A0%E0%A4%83_%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%A7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%83 Adhyaya 6])</ref></blockquote>Mumukshuh is the desire to be liberated from miseries, liberated from bondage, liberated from poverty of thought and expression but the real greater concept into which moksha would fit is amrutattva  praptih (again loosely translated as ''immortality'')''.''<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya</ref>
+When a word is used, it has its own circle of meaning, light of meaning and that meaning is to be grasped especially for words like [[Dharma (धर्मः)|dharma]] and [[Moksha (मोक्षः)|moksha]]. The word Moksha occurs once in the Shvetashvatara upanishad.<blockquote>तं ह देवमात्मबुद्धिप्रकाशं मुमुक्षुर्वै शरणमहं प्रपद्ये ॥ १८ ॥ (Shve. Upan. 6.18) <ref>Shvetasvatara Upanishad ([https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D/%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A0%E0%A4%83_%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%A7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%83 Adhyaya 6])</ref></blockquote>Mumukshuh is the desire to be liberated from miseries, liberated from bondage, liberated from poverty of thought and expression but the real greater concept into which moksha would fit is amrutattva  praptih (again loosely translated as ''immortality'')''.''<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya</ref>
 Thus we see in one example how Moksha, cannot be translated as Liberation, Free from bondage, Emancipation, Salvation etc. None of these words can equate to or describe the concept of "Amrtattva Prapti".
-Brahman is one significant concept which has been misunderstood by modern Indic interpreters who have translated IT as God. Definition of God as per English dictionary is a moral authority, a supreme being, as an image, murti or vigraha, animal or other object worshipped as divine,or symbolizing God. Conversely upanishadic definition of Brahman is a supreme existence or absolute reality. The concept of "Lord" indoctrinated into the Bharatiya system of thought processes are based on the abrahmic concept of God which is finite whereas the Brahmatattva of the deities is Infiniteness, hence God or Lord cannot be equal to Brahman.(Citation : Little Yogi in the modern city by Govinda Das)
+Brahman is one significant concept which has been misunderstood by modern Indic interpreters who have translated IT as God. Definition of God as per English dictionary is a moral authority, a supreme being, as an image, murti or vigraha, animal or other object worshipped as divine, or symbolizing God. Conversely upanishadic definition of Brahman is a supreme existence or absolute reality. The concept of "Lord" indoctrinated into the Bharatiya system of thought processes are based on the abrahmic concept of God which is finite whereas the Brahmatattva of the deities is Infiniteness, hence God or Lord cannot be equal to Brahman. (Citation : Little Yogi in the modern city by Govinda Das)
 == References ==

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Thus we see in one example how Moksha, cannot be translated as Liberation, Free from bondage, Emancipation, Salvation etc. None of these words can equate to or describe the concept of "Amrtattva Prapti".
-Brahman is one significant concept which has been misunderstood by modern Indic interpreters who have translated IT as God. Definition of God as per English dictionary is a moral authority, a supreme being, as an image, idol, animal or other object worshipped as divine,or symbolizing God. Conversely upanishadic definition of Brahman is a supreme existence or absolute reality. The concept of "Lord" indoctrinated into the Bharatiya system of thought processes are based on the abrahmic concept of God which is finite whereas the Brahmatattva of the deities is Infiniteness, hence God or Lord cannot be equal to Brahman.(Citation : Little Yogi in the modern city by Govinda Das)
+Brahman is one significant concept which has been misunderstood by modern Indic interpreters who have translated IT as God. Definition of God as per English dictionary is a moral authority, a supreme being, as an image, murti or vigraha, animal or other object worshipped as divine,or symbolizing God. Conversely upanishadic definition of Brahman is a supreme existence or absolute reality. The concept of "Lord" indoctrinated into the Bharatiya system of thought processes are based on the abrahmic concept of God which is finite whereas the Brahmatattva of the deities is Infiniteness, hence God or Lord cannot be equal to Brahman.(Citation : Little Yogi in the modern city by Govinda Das)
 == References ==

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Shabdas (Words) are not simply sounds. They are concepts. They are visions. Unless you have an identical vision in some other language, translation becomes burden. Whitehead, eminent Harvard Mathematician and Philosopher said "''All lexicographers are murderers''".
-So samskrit words cannot be translated. No doubt, when an Upanishadic text is taught to a student, the text itself does not mean anything. The preceptor has to drive it to the core of the disciple. He does it through Anuvada (अनुवादः), the original is a concept, not merely translated;  but interpreted, annotated, and expanded with many anecdotes until the disciple "digests" the concept and the exact nuances of the word. Thus Anuvada is perpetual and eternal.
+So samskrit words cannot be translated. No doubt, when an Upanishadic text is taught to a student, the text itself does not mean anything. The preceptor has to drive it to the core of the disciple. He does it through Anuvada (अनुवादः), the original is a concept, not merely translated; but interpreted, annotated, and expanded with many anecdotes until the disciple "digests" the concept and the exact nuances of the word. Thus Anuvada is perpetual and eternal.
-Any translation be it English or Persian (say of Dara Shekhov) or the many native Bharatiya languages today tend to project a wrong orientation of the original concepts, not deliberately, but primarily because each language has its set of nuances. Although it is said that many Bharatiya languages arose from Samskrit, certain sets of words and thus concepts digressed from what was presented and intended in the mulam (primary source).
+Any translation be it English or Persian (say of Dara Shikho) or the many native Bharatiya languages today tend to project a wrong orientation of the original concepts, not deliberately, but primarily because each language has its set of nuances. Although it is said that many Bharatiya languages arose from Samskrit, certain sets of words and thus concepts digressed from what was presented and intended in the mulam (primary source).
 == Shabda and Shabdartha ==
@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 Thus we see in one example how Moksha, cannot be translated as Liberation, Free from bondage, Emancipation, Salvation etc. None of these words can equate to or describe the concept of "Amrtattva Prapti".
 == References ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 17 September 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{#evu:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZjcjxDBoEw&feature=youtu.be
		+	\|alignment=right
		+	\|dimensions=500x248
		+	\|container=frame
		+	\|description=Non-translatability of Samskrit words
		+	}}
	Non-translatability (Samskrit : अननुवाद्यता) of the Samskrit words is emphasized in articles on [[Dharmawiki (धर्मविकि)\|Dharmawiki]]. Many translations have taken place during the colonial era which have been passed on to us, the present day generation. Many conceptual words of esoteric meaning have integrated in the daily lives of people following [[Sanatana Dharma (सनातनधर्मः)\|Sanatana Dharma]] and as such words do not convey the comprehensive meaning of the original samskrit word.		Non-translatability (Samskrit : अननुवाद्यता) of the Samskrit words is emphasized in articles on [[Dharmawiki (धर्मविकि)\|Dharmawiki]]. Many translations have taken place during the colonial era which have been passed on to us, the present day generation. Many conceptual words of esoteric meaning have integrated in the daily lives of people following [[Sanatana Dharma (सनातनधर्मः)\|Sanatana Dharma]] and as such words do not convey the comprehensive meaning of the original samskrit word.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:32, 4 February 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Non-translatability (Samskrit : ~~अनुवाद-अनीयता~~) of the Samskrit words is emphasized in articles on [[Dharmawiki (धर्मविकि)\|Dharmawiki]]. Many translations have taken place during the colonial era which have been passed on to us, the present day generation. Many conceptual words of esoteric meaning have integrated in the daily lives of people following [[Sanatana Dharma (सनातनधर्मः)\|Sanatana Dharma]] and as such words do not convey the comprehensive meaning of the original samskrit word.	+	Non-translatability (Samskrit : अननुवाद्यता) of the Samskrit words is emphasized in articles on [[Dharmawiki (धर्मविकि)\|Dharmawiki]]. Many translations have taken place during the colonial era which have been passed on to us, the present day generation. Many conceptual words of esoteric meaning have integrated in the daily lives of people following [[Sanatana Dharma (सनातनधर्मः)\|Sanatana Dharma]] and as such words do not convey the comprehensive meaning of the original samskrit word.

	Shabdas (Words) are not simply sounds. They are concepts. They are visions. Unless you have an identical vision in some other language, translation becomes burden. Whitehead, eminent Harvard Mathematician and Philosopher said "''All lexicographers are murderers''".		Shabdas (Words) are not simply sounds. They are concepts. They are visions. Unless you have an identical vision in some other language, translation becomes burden. Whitehead, eminent Harvard Mathematician and Philosopher said "''All lexicographers are murderers''".

← Older revision	Revision as of 10:14, 8 January 2019
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 1 January 2019
Line 17:		Line 17:
	<references />		<references />
	[[Category:About Dharmawiki]]		[[Category:About Dharmawiki]]
		+	[[Category:DPOV]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 31 December 2018
Line 15:		Line 15:

	== References ==		== References ==
		+	<references />
		+	[[Category:About Dharmawiki]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:36, 31 December 2018
Line 11:		Line 11:

	When a word is used, it has its own circle of meaning, light of meaning and that meaning is to be grasped especially for words like dharma and moksha. The word Moksha occurs once in the Shvetashvatara upanishad.<blockquote>तं ह देवमात्मबुद्धिप्रकाशं मुमुक्षुर्वै शरणमहं प्रपद्ये ॥ १८ ॥ (Shve. Upan. 6.18) <ref>Shvetasvatara Upanishad ([https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D/%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A0%E0%A4%83_%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%A7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%83 Adhyaya 6])</ref></blockquote>Mumukshuh is the desire to be liberated from miseries, liberated from bondage, liberated from poverty of thought and expression but the real greater concept into which moksha would fit is amrutattva praptih (again loosely translated as ''immortality'')''.''<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya</ref>		When a word is used, it has its own circle of meaning, light of meaning and that meaning is to be grasped especially for words like dharma and moksha. The word Moksha occurs once in the Shvetashvatara upanishad.<blockquote>तं ह देवमात्मबुद्धिप्रकाशं मुमुक्षुर्वै शरणमहं प्रपद्ये ॥ १८ ॥ (Shve. Upan. 6.18) <ref>Shvetasvatara Upanishad ([https://sa.wikisource.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B6%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8B%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D/%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A0%E0%A4%83_%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%A7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%83 Adhyaya 6])</ref></blockquote>Mumukshuh is the desire to be liberated from miseries, liberated from bondage, liberated from poverty of thought and expression but the real greater concept into which moksha would fit is amrutattva praptih (again loosely translated as ''immortality'')''.''<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya</ref>
		+
		+	Thus we see in one example how Moksha, cannot be translated as Liberation, Free from bondage, Emancipation, Salvation etc. None of these words can equate to or describe the concept of "Amrtattva Prapti".

	== References ==		== References ==